No: On the programme they said stats by the government are inaccurate, and not to be believed. And living round here I believe them !
So everything's all fine and dandy according to you and your stats?Why would they suddenly get less and less accurate?
If they’re inaccurate they’ll always have been inaccurate.
You’re just seeing localised fluctuations, all data points from various sources show a reduction in drug and alcohol use over the last 10-20 years.
I take four different drugs every day - on my doctor's advice.
Two of them, if I stop taking them, I could drop dead.
Also, lots of people don't realise that alcohol is a drug and it's quite legal (over a certain age) and probably causes more damage that all the other drugs combined.
Nonsense.
Look at countries like Italy, Spain and France where they drink alcohol with every meal and even give their kids watered down wine. They all have better life expectancies than countries like England, Scotland or the US where alcohol is commonly used for binge drinking. That's where the harm lies. Too much of anything is bad for you.
Smoking weed or snorting coke is far more harmful and prescribed medication will also cause more harm than good in the long run.
Nonsense.
Look at countries like Italy, Spain and France where they drink alcohol with every meal and even give their kids watered down wine. They all have better life expectancies than countries like England, Scotland or the US where alcohol is commonly used for binge drinking. That's where the harm lies. Too much of anything is bad for you.
Smoking weed or snorting coke is far more harmful and prescribed medication will also cause more harm than good in the long run.
Nonsense.
Look at countries like Italy, Spain and France where they drink alcohol with every meal and even give their kids watered down wine. They all have better life expectancies than countries like England, Scotland or the US where alcohol is commonly used for binge drinking. That's where the harm lies. Too much of anything is bad for you.
Smoking weed or snorting coke is far more harmful and prescribed medication will also cause more harm than good in the long run.
So everything's all fine and dandy according to you and your stats?
They don't work 40 hours a week with increasingly long commutes. I definitely feel a compulsion to drink more after a long day than if i have got home at a reasonable time.Italy, Spain and France all have a very different culture and attitude to drinking alcohol to us. You ask anybody who works in treating substance abuse and they’ll all tell you that alcohol does the most damage. According to a substance abuse worker I know very well if alcohol was made illegal they’d have to make it’s own classification of class A + such is the damage it does.
They don't work 40 hours a week with increasingly long commutes. I definitely feel a compulsion to drink more after a long day than if i have got home at a reasonable time.
Most Italian companies do 9-6 and it’s common to work Saturday mornings, luckily I don’t. The compulsion to drink is a mental state, I know because I argue with the mrs every other day when I get home.
I am surprised by that, do they commute much?
Italy, Spain and France all have a very different culture and attitude to drinking alcohol to us. You ask anybody who works in treating substance abuse and they’ll all tell you that alcohol does the most damage. According to a substance abuse worker I know very well if alcohol was made illegal they’d have to make it’s own classification of class A + such is the damage it does.
smoking a bit of weed.
Health wise, heroin, crack cocaine and meth are far worse for you. I wasn't referring to the social impacts but alcohol is legal so obviously it's going to have a more widespread impact.
Alcohol has many health benefits when drank in moderation. To label it as some kind of poison is wrong.
This is the typical thing a stoner would say. It's hardly ever "a bit" with cannabis users. I've know so many over the course of my life and it consumes them. Sure they don't get violent or end up in A&E on a Saturday night but they're just as dependent on a substance and there's the health risks too
"A recent analysis using data from three large studies in Australia and New Zealand found that adolescents who used marijuana regularly were significantly less likely than their non-using peers to finish high school or obtain a degree. They also had a much higher chance of developing dependence, using other drugs, and attempting suicide.55 Several studies have also linked heavy marijuana use to lower income, greater welfare dependence, unemployment, criminal behavior, and lower life satisfaction"
There is a difference between having a glass or two of wine with a meal and drinking a bottle of wine ir two for 'pleasure'.Nonsense.
Look at countries like Italy, Spain and France where they drink alcohol with every meal and even give their kids watered down wine. They all have better life expectancies than countries like England, Scotland or the US where alcohol is commonly used for binge drinking. That's where the harm lies. Too much of anything is bad for you.
Smoking weed or snorting coke is far more harmful and prescribed medication will also cause more harm than good in the long run.
Health wise, heroin, crack cocaine and meth are far worse for you. I wasn't referring to the social impacts but alcohol is legal so obviously it's going to have a more widespread impact.
So true.The truth is that most cannabis smokers are not actually addicted and most of them don’t go on and become addicts.
Again, you’re making a generalisation to back up your point based upon the extremes. It is possible for people to use cannabis in moderation rather than going onto become full blown addicts.
Off the top of my head I think it’s something like 1in 10 who try it go on to have problems. I’d say that most people who drink alcohol in the UK are addicted to a certain extent and would have problems giving up alcohol tomorrow if it suddenly became illegal.
If you’re going to claim alcohol has health benefits, then surely you have to say the same about cannabis? The recent epilepsy cases show that there’s a conversation to be had there. The UK is well behind other countries on this.
I don’t actually smoke it by the way, I did when I was younger, but so did a lot of people and managed to avoid a life of addiction and unemployment.
What a shock. Tony trying to sound like a dickHave a look at the graph schmmeee has put up. I think you’re wrong. I’m trying to sound like a dick but I think you’re paying too much attention to market research and not enough to scientific research.
The truth is that most cannabis smokers are not actually addicted and most of them don’t go on and become addicts.
Again, you’re making a generalisation to back up your point based upon the extremes. It is possible for people to use cannabis in moderation rather than going onto become full blown addicts.
My God, how is that even possible?!?It just makes me talk more shit than I usually do.
We're from that era that went to the pub a lot. Mobile phones were not around or in their infancy, so we'd keep in contact by meeting up in the boozers. When I lived in Walsgrave my mates who were brothers lived on the way to the Acorn pub, so I'd knock their door and we'd walk up to the pub just as They were opening most nights, it was a routine we kept for ages.I used to enjoy the odd joint now and again. A small deal would last me months, only having a spliff every other weekend or so. It just made me laugh and head for the fridge for munchies! I loved the stuff, but after all my heart attacks I gave up smoking which also meant my spliffs. Haven't missed either (normal fags or weed). Mind you, I do drink too much!
I think there is too much concentrating on the effects of individual drugs, ( whether legal or illegal), rather than looking at why people need to get fucked up in particular, certain nations like ourselves, who seem to be particularly prone to it.
Health wise, heroin, crack cocaine and meth are far worse for you. I wasn't referring to the social impacts but alcohol is legal so obviously it's going to have a more widespread impact.
Alcohol has many health benefits when drank in moderation. To label it as some kind of poison is wrong.
Sorry mate. Pure nonsense. I did a year long British Institute of Innkeepers course many years ago. During that course, apart from learning absolutely everything there is to know about running a pub, there also included a trip to a brewery and one evening was spent producing 100% pure alcohol from a bottle of wine. Long process, but in the end we produced about an egg-cup full. Everyone was invited to try it, and while most turned it down, I tried a sip. It was super strong, but it didn't kill me! That was in the late 1980's.A drop of pure alcohol would kill you if ingested.
It was something I was told by a hospital lab worker. They said it would burn probably through your oesophagus, but if it didn't it would either cause horrific swelling or internal bleeding and you'd choke to death.
Maybe they were being a bit melodramatic with the 'drop' but it's kept in very tight control up there with very strong corrosives.
Alcohol is actually as a poison. A drop of pure alcohol would kill you if ingested. We only drink it in very diluted doses, and even then if manages to have health implications both short and long term. You know the feeling of being drunk? That's the poison taking effect on your system. The hangover - that's your system trying to repair the damage.
The health benefits aren't from the alcohol - it's from the minerals and vitamins present in the fruit/barley//etc and water. You'd get the same benefits if you didn't let the stuff ferment and produce alcohol.
As has been said, how many of the people could give up alcohol if it were suddenly banned? Prohibition showed that even very law abiding citizens were willing to break the law and contribute to organised crime to get a drink - that sounds like the actions of an addict to me.
By the way, I'm not calling for a ban on alcohol (I'm actually more of a leaning towards legalisation and heavy taxation to pay for the problems) but it is a very dangerous and harmful drug. If alcohol were 'discovered' now, the drug agencies would never legalise it given the current rules. It was only really due to it having less harmful bacteria etc than water that led to it being the historical liquid of choice because people didn't understand it was the boiling of the water that got rid of the nasties. Plus the beer in those days was much much weaker than todays.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?