For me it depends if we protest at Northampton or do a "day at the ricoh"
Northampton would simply be asking for trouble
Tommy I think we are at cross purposes. You are reading what you want to see not what I'm saying. I suggest you read it all again fella!Go back and read it again.
it's obvious that ACL believe they can survive on 150,000 a year rent, why didn't they offer that years ago.
Look we can talk all night on here,...but what do US FANS, the true owners of CCFC, do next?
Find Tim Fisher and beat him up?Look we can talk all night on here,...but what do US FANS, the true owners of CCFC, do next?
But please remember who put us into this position in the first place, ACL far too long ago for most of us to remember but the owners reacted to put us into administration before that could happen, if they hadn't ACL
would have totally destroyed the Sky Blues IMHO!
I don't care who owns the stadium, as long as we are playing in it!
Awesome!Tim forgot to mention that they drove freely to the cliff edge, got out of the car then started dancing near the edge shouting "NA NA NA NA NA you can't push me".
was the rent 1.4 a year,now the offer is 150,000 surely that saves sisu over million pounds who needs revenue streams when your saving that kind of sum.
But please remember who put us into this position in the first place, ACL far too long ago for most of us to remember but the owners reacted to put us into administration before that could happen, if they hadn't ACL
would have totally destroyed the Sky Blues IMHO!
what a load of shit non payment of rent failing to negotiate correctly put us here SISU to blame nobody else end of
Forget SISU and think about the football club for a minute.
The offer on the table now is absolutely a good rent deal and reduces expenditure for the football club which is great, but it doesn't help the football club one jot with income for FFP calculation.
My view is and has always been that the football club adds value to the Ricoh as a business way beyond match days, and should have access . For example the naming rights to the arena will IMHO not have the same income value in future without CCFC.
As PWKH pointed out some time ago "match day revenues are not sufficient to make any real difference to the gap between the other commercial incomes of the Club and the wages. In order to have a self-sufficient club which does not rely on pulling in money every years as loans or investments or whatever it needs to have 365 days a year income. That was the business model that drove the design of the Ricoh."
what a load of shit non payment of rent failing to negotiate correctly put us here SISU to blame nobody else end of
Would Haskell have offered more than he did to Appleton?Well, if ACL had put us in admin and not SISU, am I correct in assuming that ACL would have appointed the administrator?. In which case we would be under different ownership. Hardly destroying the club is it. I stand to be corrected.
what a load of shit non payment of rent failing to negotiate correctly put us here SISU to blame nobody else end of
The excuse before this was 'ACL had made it clear there is no deal to be done'. Well now there's a deal to be done, whats the next excuse Fisher...
The excuse before this was 'ACL had made it clear there is no deal to be done'. Well now there's a deal to be done, whats the next excuse Fisher...
Take the deal. With a 10 year Sisu plan the F&B will be on back on the table. Their next step would be to buy the Higgs share and hence get into 50% of the Revenue streams.
Don't forget they have had many opportunities to do this (Maybe the full stadium) but have chose not too.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?