Exactly, just their usual twist on things. The way I took it was if he wants to spend money on players he might let a couple go and do some juggling around. They just know city fans will see that headline and start to complain.As usual the headline from the CET reflects nothing that the article actually directly says...
Stokes, Vincelot?Won't be complaining if he brings in Clarke by offloading a few players. Let's be honest who is irreplaceable in our team at the moment?
That's what I took from what Mogga said.Won't be complaining if he brings in Clarke by offloading a few players. Let's be honest who is irreplaceable in our team at the moment?
Here we go again. Everybody moaning before they know the full story. If he off loads two fringe players to bring in a star we will all be happy. TM is just playing down the expectation.
Can we stop these stupid posts for three weeks and then comment when the window shuts.
Possibly players like Haynes, George Thomas or even Willis. He doesn't seem too keen on lamerais and he's moved vincelot around a lot. He might want to sign players that are perfect for this 3-4-3 system of his and let go of those that don't suit. To be honest I can't see a lot that he would be willing to let go off and I'd like to think we could keep all the players I've just mentioned.So who goes?
It's not the point, the point is we're already 10 men down on last season, that's 10 men's worth of wages already freed up and season ticket sales up on last year. The point is how an earth can we be in a position to have to offload players when we're already in a position where we hardly have any players as it is. How are we that much worse off than last season ?
It's a worry isn't it.It's not the point, the point is we're already 10 men down on last season, that's 10 men's worth of wages already freed up and season ticket sales up on last year. The point is how an earth can we be in a position to have to offload players when we're already in a position where we hardly have any players as it is. How are we that much worse off than last season ?
Possibly a fee to be paid?It's not the point, the point is we're already 10 men down on last season, that's 10 men's worth of wages already freed up and season ticket sales up on last year. The point is how an earth can we be in a position to have to offload players when we're already in a position where we hardly have any players as it is. How are we that much worse off than last season ?
So who goes?
How we put up with this bollox is beyond me !!Why now? we kick off in 2 weeks this shit should have been done 4 weeks ago for the love of god how mowbray puts up with this bollocks is beyond me
Have you seen other thread, 'first team player sold', I'm guessing RCC or Vincelot.So who goes?
It's working.Click bait..
I've been saying the same thing since 3rd May 2012(OK SBWM) The phylosophy is sell 6 players on £2k each, bring in 3 at £1.5k each and have £7.5k pw. in the bank. This is what SISU have done in the 8 years of tenure. The squad gets smaller or just about stays the same but with much more inferior players coming in. Coleman moaned like f**k about "Being on the bones of our backsides" when we had a full squad of 25 and half a dozen injuries ffs!It's not the point, the point is we're already 10 men down on last season, that's 10 men's worth of wages already freed up and season ticket sales up on last year. The point is how an earth can we be in a position to have to offload players when we're already in a position where we hardly have any players as it is. How are we that much worse off than last season ?
The philosophy over the last few of years has been to try and reduce a wage bill that was unaffordable. There is no £7.5k in the bank, we've been making losses for as long as I can remember.
TM has his budget, he is happy with said budget but like most in this league he will need to release and potentially sell players in order to bring in and afford thr wages of new players. Its not rocket science.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?