Coun Lucas said: “Of course he is going to be able to do both roles. Do you think I would have allowed him to be considered if I thought he couldn’t?
“For the last 18 months Martin Reeves has been working 18 hour days doing the two jobs anyway. It’s just formalised now.
Just saw this (I know, it is from yesterday but hadn't seen it posted)
http://coventryobserver.co.uk/news/...ether-175k-salaried-council-chief-reeves-job/
So they are hiring somebody to cover for him when he does stuff for the West Midlands Authority.
How do they get away with the bullshit?
18 hour days? Lol
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
It it is a total disgrace, the man should be removed and a replacement brought in on a much lower and more sensible salary. Lucas is full of bull shit.
Perhaps they won't be getting away with it for much longer!
Do they have local elections coming up then? I have had some stuff through over here but haven't looked at it yet.
Does that effect Reeves though?
I don't know how they get away with this kind of thing. You wouldn't get it in a regular job.
Imagine going to your boss and saying you've taken another job so won't be at work all the time but still expect to get your full salary!
Sounds like Monty Pythons 4 Yorkshire men. "You were lucky"18 hour days? Lol
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Imagine telling your boss completely wrong figures for the business, then them announcing them to the public...Then them bigging you up for a promotion and lying to the public about not needing a replacement...
Lucas on the radio this morning "you know me well enough to know I am very straight in what I say". I presume she's not referring to when she kept banging on about it being a disgrace teams not playing in their home city or that ACL was 'washing its face'.
Or that she wouldn't allow him to take the job if he couldn't do both...
what did she say on the radio?
I doubt anything will happen, it will go the ethics committee who just then deny all knowledge.
It will be fine if it goes to the ethics committee it will be headed by Lucas and Reeves and they will say he is doing such a good job take a payrise instead but make sure you sack a couple of cleaners to balance the wage budget.
The council’s website failed to notify taxpayers and voters that an acting chief executive had been appointed, or update senior management roles, and there was no public or media announcement via the usual press release.
One source also said some are questioning whether the appointment breached the council’s protocols, as the decision taken by Mr Reeves and Coun Lucas did not go to the Labour group, let alone to the full council of democratically elected councillors.
How much dodginess like that can actually go on before somebody gets the boot?
Then blame it on SISU.
How much dodginess like that can actually go on before somebody gets the boot?
Looks like she isn't liked much - http://coventryobserver.co.uk/news/exclusive-plot-oust-ann-lucas-next-week-coventry-council-leader/
If you're getting 200k/p.a. to work for CCC, then the very least I'd expect as a taxpayer is that you work full-time for CCC. I'd like to know if the WMCA (West Midlands Combined Authority) who he has been moonlighting for, have been paying the equivalent value of his time back to the council.
Alternatively if (as has been claimed by Lucas) Reeves has been doing double-shifts then it's also pretty obvious to me that he can't have been at his best at either job. I couldn't care less about the WMCA, but I expect the Chief Exec of Coventry City Council to be sharp and alert every day for his 200k. There are plenty of other jobs in the council where you simply wouldn't be allowed to do this.
Basically it sounds a lot like Lucas is running Coventry like a personal fiefdom, where she brooks no dissent and feels free to shortcut due process. That is entirely inappropriate for a democratically elected representative, regardless of which political side of the fence you're on.
Basically it sounds a lot like Lucas is running Coventry like a personal fiefdom, where she brooks no dissent and feels free to shortcut due process. That is entirely inappropriate for a democratically elected representative, regardless of which political side of the fence you're on.
So, if he did it for a year, the council is paying him close to 3 times the average salary to work for somebody else!
If you're getting 200k/p.a. to work for CCC, then the very least I'd expect as a taxpayer is that you work full-time for CCC. I'd like to know if the WMCA (West Midlands Combined Authority) who he has been moonlighting for, have been paying the equivalent value of his time back to the council.
.
She also said she is working extra hard and of course "you know me i am always straight"
My ward is the recipient of a Lucas Loyalist. Therefore it's a no from me. The way she gained the job was pretty disgraceful and since then has tried to fill other roles with loyal support ers to strengthen her own position. Also with the contempt she shows the residents of this City when interviewed is astonishing.
Just saw this (I know, it is from yesterday but hadn't seen it posted)
http://coventryobserver.co.uk/news/...ether-175k-salaried-council-chief-reeves-job/
So they are hiring somebody to cover for him when he does stuff for the West Midlands Authority.
How do they get away with the bullshit?
I am an employer in Germany and my staff are not allowed to work more than 8 hours a day on a regular basis and not more than 48 hours a week in total. If I admitted to employing people for 18 Hours a day ( including for another employer ), I would be in real trouble and be fined heavily. Is it different in the UK?
If you're getting 200k/p.a. to work for CCC, then the very least I'd expect as a taxpayer is that you work full-time for CCC. I'd like to know if the WMCA (West Midlands Combined Authority) who he has been moonlighting for, have been paying the equivalent value of his time back to the council.
Alternatively if (as has been claimed by Lucas) Reeves has been doing double-shifts then it's also pretty obvious to me that he can't have been at his best at either job. I couldn't care less about the WMCA, but I expect the Chief Exec of Coventry City Council to be sharp and alert every day for his 200k. There are plenty of other jobs in the council where you simply wouldn't be allowed to do this.
Basically it sounds a lot like Lucas is running Coventry like a personal fiefdom, where she brooks no dissent and feels free to shortcut due process. That is entirely inappropriate for a democratically elected representative, regardless of which political side of the fence you're on.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?