Wash your mouth out,Hopefully it is CCFC screwing it up
Jan 17 on burnley
PUBLISHED
12:50 18th August 2016
Young Burnley striker Dan Agyei has signed on loan until January, 2017, with League One side Coventry City.
The 19-year-old joined the Clarets from AFC Wimbledon in the summer of 2015 on a on a long-term contract.
The 18-year-old had burst on to the scene with the Dons’, scoring 35 times for the club’s U18 and U21 sides.
This July, he made his full debut for the Clarets in the pre-season friendly game at Bradford City.
Agyei will now push for a place under Sky Blues boss Tony Mowbray at the Ricoh Arena.
Read more at http://www.burnleyfootballclub.com/...lues-on-loan-3256610.aspx#84bbTrVDwMVlv0sP.99
Which is it FFSSeason long loan according to Burnley
Young Burnley striker Dan Agyei has signed a season-long loan with League One side Coventry City.
The 19-year-old joined the Clarets from AFC Wimbledon in the summer of 2015 on a on a long-term contract.
The 18-year-old had burst on to the scene with the Dons’, scoring 35 times for the club’s U18 and U21 sides.
This July, he made his full debut for the Clarets in the pre-season friendly game at Bradford City.
Agyei will now push for a place under Sky Blues boss Tony Mowbray at t
The anomaly in the accounts pointed out by OSB58, I take it that was investigated and
identified and then explained, thereby clearing up any suspicions some may have felt
Toward the owners of the club.:angelic:
I've no issue bringing in a development player, overseas or otherwise. It was the loan bit. Either needs to be a loan with view to a buy or a straight purchase. No point developing someone else's player.
A few months ago, as always he made it clear he was not apportioning blame( quite right)When was this ?
cov telegraph and the burnley site initially reported season long loan, then corrected themselves.He's here until Jan 17th, where are people getting a season long loan from?
Agreed, it's just having to hand him back in January I don't like.The position we are in at the moment loan or permanent makes no difference to me. If we can get a better player right now on loan than a player we can sign permanently I'd go with a loan. Anyone we sign permanently who goes on to do well will be off anyway. I don't think we'll ever be in a position to realistically build for the future whilst we are in this league. Not with the standard of player we'd all like to see anyway.
He's here until Jan 17th, where are people getting a season long loan from?
Agreed, it's just having to hand him back in January I don't like.
A few months ago, as always he made it clear he was not apportioning blame( quite right)
Just pointed out there was an anomaly in the accounts that he could not explain.
Even though we ended up keeping AA, all the will he won't he shit leading up to JanuaryAgreed, it's just having to hand him back in January I don't like.
low risk was in connection with turnbull, a good player, whom they could possibliy make money from for virtually no out lay.Actually i believe its the words "low risk" that are making you look like a penis
Did I say it was a conspiracy, as I said he raised it and pointed it out that's all, maybeSo that's it then? OSB does not have enough information to answer his own query and that leads to a conspiracy theory?
Dont recall the query but as the accounts are independently audited I doubt it is a great problem
and you know this how ?you said we weren't likely to have paid a fee for turnbull as we never pay fees, we paid a fee earlier in the transfer window
im slain by your flag of truth and you sword of wordy wisdom.You chose your user name and avatar wisely.
no it wasn't it was a general point about the "sort of business our owners are in" stop backtracking it's embarrassinglow risk was in connection with turnbull, a good player, whom they could possibliy make money from for virtually no out lay.
that's exactly the sort of business our owners are in, low risk, high potential profit.
and you know this how ?
and you know this how ?
Dagenham and Redbridge can confirm that Coventry City have signed Jodi Jones on a 4 year deal for an undisclosed fee.and you know this how ?
it was ment to be read in relation to the player , but if you can distress the owning company to let you have the stadium, or get it for a knock down price, then take all the profits out of it , I think that is low risk POTENTIAL high profitsno it wasn't it was a general point about the "sort of business our owners are in" stop backtracking it's embarrassing
undisclosed, was 10th of may in this window ?Dagenham and Redbridge can confirm that Coventry City have signed Jodi Jones on a 4 year deal for an undisclosed fee.
Read more at http://www.daggers.co.uk/news/article/coventry-city-sign-jodi-jones-3107269.aspx#yMrToUfkt1DpShWp.99
undisclosed, was 10th of may in this window ?
After 3 games gates they will revise the budget down????? What a complete load of old toshAfter Tuesday nights gate figures they will be revising the budget down! we are in this bloody catch 22 situation shite football low crowds revised budgets - however if we could all be like the geordies and support the team no matter what the budget will become such that we could get the players we need to get us out of this hell hole of a division
undisclosed, was 10th of may in this window ?
The announcement no, The signing, yes.undisclosed, was 10th of may in this window ?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?