Nice to now know it isn't his fault about the delay in the news on the new stadium.
I gather all his promises of dates were given to him by the agency appointed to deliver the stadium. Personally I think he was a little foolish to just take their information at face value but clearly he has not deliberately misled fans.
Nice to now know it isn't his fault about the delay in the news on the new stadium.
I gather all his promises of dates were given to him by the agency appointed to deliver the stadium. Personally I think he was a little foolish to just take their information at face value but clearly he has not deliberately misled fans.
The difference being that in signing off ACL's accounts without concern for the on-going health of the business; the auditors shared the same view as that of Lucas. The same view was espoused by the Judicial Review judge, who stated "The private investor in the shoes of the Council would have been properly entitled to take the view that ACL was capable of servicing a loan for £14.4m over 41 years, and the security was sufficient to make the risk of it failing to do so commercially worthwhile.” So, a judge, being in independent possession of all facts saw no issue with regards ACL's health for over 40 years.
Who shares Fisher's view of the timescales associated with the new stadium?