Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Tim Fisher Rumour (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter Nick
  • Start date Apr 21, 2013
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
N

Noggin

New Member
  • Apr 23, 2013
  • #71
ajsccfc said:
'Traitorous' isn't really one of the many words you can use to describe Fisher, surely. Who's he turned on?
Click to expand...

He's meant to be acting in the best interests of CCFC, it seems to be he is acting in the best interests of SISU and not the club, seems like traitorous is fair to me.

How different it could have been for the club if they had accepted the 400k rent deal. We could easily still have Robbins and be in the playoffs.

Instead the club looks more screwed than it ever has been

Edit - Just to be clear violence against him is unacceptable either way.
 
Last edited: Apr 23, 2013

SydneySkyBlue

Member
  • Apr 23, 2013
  • #72
lordsummerisle said:
View attachment 1932


Roll up, roll up, don't want to miss the next bandwagon.
Click to expand...

The SISU Out bandwagon is quite a large one. You might not want to miss it while you're looking for Elliott and Hoffman:

 
Last edited: Apr 23, 2013

ajsccfc

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 23, 2013
  • #73
Noggin said:
He's meant to be acting in the best interests of CCFC, it seems to be he is acting in the best interests of SISU and not the club, seems like traitorous is fair to me.
Click to expand...

He's working for the owners who are still pretty much acting as they always have, as has he. It's not like he was ever trumpeted as a fans' own representative. If he's serving us shit, at least he's consistently doing so.
 
N

Noggin

New Member
  • Apr 23, 2013
  • #74
ajsccfc said:
He's working for the owners who are still pretty much acting as they always have, as has he. It's not like he was ever trumpeted as a fans' own representative. If he's serving us shit, at least he's consistently doing so.
Click to expand...

Yes he is working for SISU and not for CCFC, my question is (and it's a question that I dont know the answer too, not a statement) is that actually allowed? isn't he required by law to be doing what is best for CCFC? since he is a director of CCFC. Not accepting the rent deal and instead keeping one that is running up much greater debts was clearly not what was best for CCFC.
 

ajsccfc

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 23, 2013
  • #75
You'd be hard-pressed to legally define what's best for the club in a case like this, but if what SISU are doing is against the law in some way they can't last.
 

lordsummerisle

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 23, 2013
  • #76
GinettasStickySofa said:
The SISU Out bandwagon is quite a large one. You might not want to miss it while you're looking for Elliott and Hoffman:

Click to expand...

I can't believe that it's me you're accusing of having their head in the sand.

Unless of course it's a self-portrait and you're waiting for HIV to come from behind?
 
N

Noggin

New Member
  • Apr 23, 2013
  • #77
ajsccfc said:
You'd be hard-pressed to legally define what's best for the club in a case like this, but if what SISU are doing is against the law in some way they can't last.
Click to expand...

Is it difficult really?. CCFC are legally tied into that contract of 1.4 mill, it was offered to change that contract to 400k + other benefits. How can not making that agreement weather or not it was everything you wanted or even feel you needed not best for the club? It makes the club 1 mill a year better off. You can then continue further negotiation if needed from that point without running up extra unnecessary debt each month.

How can saying we are going to move to a small stadium outside the city be in the best interests of CCFC financially when we could very easily on the back of a napkin work out that even if we were given free rent at this new location we'd be losing more money.

It's very easy to see that some of the choices that have been made weren't in ccfc's interests and very obviously so.
 

ajsccfc

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 23, 2013
  • #78
It could be argued that what's best for the club would be to wear them down to an even better deal with all the matchday profits and so on. Obviously it's all a shady practice, but 'best interests' is too vague to be able to define easily without wily spin being able to be applied.
 

SydneySkyBlue

Member
  • Apr 23, 2013
  • #79
lordsummerisle said:
I can't believe that it's me you're accusing of having their head in the sand.

Unless of course it's a self-portrait and you're waiting for HIV to come from behind?
Click to expand...


"Don't trust Hoffman, don't trust Elliott, don't trust Hoffman, don't trust Elliott. Don't trust Hoffman, don't trust Elliott, don't trust Hoffman, don't trust Elliott"


You're so caught up in the smell of your own fart that you're ignoring what's important.

If you ever get bored of repeating your counterproductive bitter ramblings, feel free to do something productive and join the Trust.

At least that way you can share your Google revelations with the outside world! :wave:
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?