The only time I ever look is when you lot roll them out! They (were) followed by about 10 people (probably all their own accounts, at that) and (were) even less popular than my own personal twitter account - and I don't really use that! All I'm followed by is hookers and chefs!
The only attention being given them is here!
You see, you're doing it now. Can't let it lie and just let it drop, got to have the last word.
tbf I'm probably not in a strong position in needing to have the last word(!) but just let it drop, move on, stop all the infantile bickering that detracts from the message everybody wants, and is really rather off-putting in trying to support it.
No its wrong and you are being at best naive to deny it
Its really not. And you just don’t want to stop your obsession with people. Trust me it turns people off and just creates division. If you want to be listened to you take the high road and let the rabble scrap it out below you.
Its really not. And you just don’t want to stop your obsession with people. Trust me it turns people off and just creates division. If you want to be listened to you take the high road and let the rabble scrap it out below you.
Who is listening to them Nick.These are the people who are listened to though? Nothing wrong with pointing it out, it's actually prevented division.
Who is listening to them Nick.
Like Northern said the only time most of us see the shit they preach is on here.
People aren't that stupid you need to ignore these people and not give them air.
They will suffocate themselves.
So when I was doxxed by Les Reid and Cllr Tim Mayer, which included @ing my employer, I didn't hear you piping up thenThreats like this you mean?
This is what happens when people speak out. These dribbling old men get rolled out with threats like this.
It's why all sides should have been pressured years ago, some seem a bit too desperate.
So when I was doxxed by Les Reid and Cllr Tim Mayer, which included @ing my employer, I didn't hear you piping up then
The original Doxxing was nothing to do with him.I thought you and Grendel came to a truce?
The original Doxxing was nothing to do with him.
In terms what happened on twitter earlier between Grendel and I, we have come to an understanding which now requires no further comment.
Thing is it his his views doesn't mean everyone of them agree with it.The trust give them plenty of air... The ones who speak on behalf of fans to the media.
People obviously are that stupid, I had cj telling me I was wrong for about a year and that he wouldn't do that.
If you don't feel that way that's up to you. Your continued obsession with looking up what I tweet and commenting on it, when I've already removed you from following me multiple times, is a bit weird.Oh I wouldn’t be so sure of that if I was you
The message won't get anywhere with people like that being rolled out.
It's exactly why duggins can brag about public opinion and make things up.
I have already warned Pete about the personal (I don't mean name calling) attacks and threats he is likely to get.
By engaging with them you're giving them a platform. Just ignore them.
So when I was doxxed by Les Reid and Cllr Tim Mayer, which included @ing my employer, I didn't hear you piping up then
Absolutely appalling if trueAt least they were clever enough to get the right person. You have done a search of the telegraph site for his name you dopey c**t. You posted your own name on social media then wondered why people used it.
You are a disgrace, you really are. I've found the article for myself.
It was an article about somebody with the same name as him who's wife died. You are using that to try and threaten him and saying his family wouldn't want it brought up.
You are scum. It's bad enough that it's the wrong person but if it was actually him and his wife had died and it was in the paper its a disgrace.
Coroner blasts 'slipshod' 999 service
You haven't even got the brains to look at the dates.
At least they were clever enough to get the right person. You have done a search of the telegraph site for his name you dopey c**t. You posted your own name on social media then wondered why people used it.
You are a disgrace, you really are. I've found the article for myself.
It was an article about somebody with the same name as him who's wife died. You are using that to try and threaten him and saying his family wouldn't want it brought up.
You are scum. It's bad enough that it's the wrong person but if it was actually him and his wife had died and it was in the paper its a disgrace.
Coroner blasts 'slipshod' 999 service
You haven't even got the brains to look at the dates.
For avoidance of doubt
View attachment 13939
Even making reference to it is bad enough considering you thought it was him. You also spent time searching for him online and then you call others obsessed?
Quite a few of Kaln's followers will be his alter egosHardly ‘heavyweights’ anyway are they? Orca has 164 followers and Lies Reid has 59.
They will suffocate themselves.
Quite a few of Kaln's followers will be his alter egos
Because it's not him? Because I was disgusted that you would try and use that against somebody thinking it was them?It's not me that's just posted it to a public forum now, is it? Why would you do that?
Oh and by the way, feel free to post up any 'threat' I made in regard to this. I had expressly said in tweets and in private to Grendel I wouldn't ever post it.
No you put him on the board of the BBC. Which was my point.I've had a look through that account, it's mental, desperately unfunny stuff. It's the kind of shit that'd turn the most avid whistler pro-SISU. Only fellow mentalists (two of them, according to Grendel) would find it remotely interesting... and given the inanity one of them used to post on GMK, having them as your number one fan isn't exactly a ringing endorsement.
It was far less followers before he got a platform on here. IRL you don't give the drunk shouty old tramp in the street the gig presenting the six o'clock news.
I've had a look through that account, it's mental, desperately unfunny stuff. It's the kind of shit that'd turn the most avid whistler pro-SISU. Only fellow mentalists (two of them, according to Grendel) would find it remotely interesting... and given the inanity one of them used to post on GMK, having them as your number one fan isn't exactly a ringing endorsement.
It was far less followers before he got a platform on here. IRL you don't give the drunk shouty old tramp in the street the gig presenting the six o'clock news.
A random person looks me up on LinkedIn. A person with whom I have no common connections or any link to professionally. I googled the name of that person with the word Coventry, and the article Nick references is on the first page. I had absolutely no clue of Grendel's real name until he searched for me.
Because it's not him? Because I was disgusted that you would try and use that against somebody thinking it was them?
The fact you were saying I know where you live based on it.
You aren't the brightest, are you? I'd get help, you have crossed a line massively.
You then proceeded to give him the "I know where you live" threats without realising that it was a different person. You actually thought he was the poor bloke who's wife died and still tried to use that as ammo.
It about sums you up doesn't it? Yet you are whinging that somebody posts your name after you did yourself.
This is why you and the other rats need calling out and shaming. Couldn't give a shit if you setup a newsgroup in 1986, you are a nasty piece of work.
Except that I didn't, even though he actually asked me to. It could be him, as it's a startling coincidence - maybe you should ask him. In fact much like the coincidence of someone Grendel doesn't like on Twitter with the initials CW and him being convinced they're former Council employee Chris West.
Ammo? He asked me to post the link and I refused - you're the only one who's posted it. The private conversation Grendel and I had subsequently included me telling him "I can promise you now, I will not post the link or reference it.". I'll leave your clearly superior intellect to work out why
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?