With SISU in charge ??!! Don't be silly, they're still lying to us every month about one issue or another, not to mention pursuing court action.
Fisher sacked
Waggot sacked
Apologies for Northampton debacle
Drop Court Action
Reduce management charges
Engage with new landlords
Improve merchandise arrangement by moving back to Ricoh and restocking
Sensible ticket options/prices
Then I might become a regular again !
I'm only not going at the moment because it's shit. So if it improves, even this season I'll start going up again. Still not planning on getting a season ticket next season though.
Blame, blame ,blame SISU all you want but give at least a little credit where due. TM is on paper a first class appointment and to all that paid attention it seems he wants a longer term contract once we get the threat behind us this season put to bed.
As for court action. Well tbh it's their right and tbf there are many issues unresolved. The fact the council seem to have acted inappropriately can't just be ignored. Will it help or hinder us? I'm not sure. But win a case and that may lead to a positive angle immerging even if it's substantial damages. If it's not affecting what takes place with the team under TM let them have their days in court.
As for going up getting behind the team? If you can't see this as a big step towards trying to do good and wanting your team to succeed then there's no hope for you. Owners come and go, owners are never the most loved but we have a decent manager starting now and for whatever we might think we are playing at the Ricoh (that ship has not sailed yet) so get up and show your support for CCFC and the team. Forget SISU for now and get behind the club and show others who may want to buy our club we are worth their investment.
If we were sat in the top 6 at the moment we'd be looking at 15K or more for Port Vale and most people would suddenly forget about SISU.
YEs, as they did against Crewe, Gillingham, Arsenal, MK Dons, etc etc.
It's what happens on the pitch that keeps the majority of people away.
I'm sure there are people who are genuinely staying away because of SISU or a specific reason but I think its a small % of those who have stopped regularly attending. For me the biggest single reason our crowds have dropped is the performance on the pitch. If we were sat in the top 6 at the moment we'd be looking at 15K or more for Port Vale and most people would suddenly forget about SISU.
What happens on the pitch is the biggest factor for attendances that's undoubtedly true but it's alot more complex than that, the sisu factor means that the majority of the people who belive you keep going to games and stick with your club through thick and thin don't feel that applies under sisu anymore, when you combine that with the fact that people got out of the habit of going due to northampton, the fact that a ridiculous beyond all belief turn over of players means the majority of city fans couldn't name our team nore recognise most of them in the street and a soul crushing lack of atmosphere at the ricoh makes going when the times are bad much much less appealing than it would be normally and don't even feel guilty about not going because quite frankly it's what the club deserve and may even be what the club needs to increase the chance of sisu going.
Credit where it's due, sure, Sisu have brought in one of the best managers they could have been expected to attract in the situation we find ourselves in.
criticism where it's due, a contract that short hangs a massive cloud over the positive news, it's bizarre and something you almost never see from other clubs. If it was just about the threat of relegation then a 2 1/2 year contract with a relegation release clause excisable by either side would have been the outcome. They also left it till the point in time where this appointment would have little to no access to the transfer market.
this is not a big step towards doing good, it's a small part of a big step with no evidence that the rest of the big step will be forthcoming, you think the things Tony is saying suggests the rest of those things will be forthcoming, I think the fact he hasn't signed on for a decent amount of time means he has little to no confidence in what he is saying.
If Sisu gave Mowbray lets say 2M (the half share stadium money) to spend on players/wages, I'd go to all of the Saturday home games
Good grief Noggin you're on a real downer since we had this good news aren't you?
Did you ever think that as we approached TM not the other way round and we wanted him in immediately that getting a long term deal is something which follows on as this would be too cumbersome a task and lengthy process to determine and put in place right away?
I'm sure there are people who are genuinely staying away because of SISU or a specific reason but I think its a small % of those who have stopped regularly attending. For me the biggest single reason our crowds have dropped is the performance on the pitch. If we were sat in the top 6 at the moment we'd be looking at 15K or more for Port Vale and most people would suddenly forget about SISU.
With SISU in charge ??!! Don't be silly, they're still lying to us every month about one issue or another, not to mention pursuing court action.
Fisher sacked
Waggot sacked
Apologies for Northampton debacle
Drop Court Action
Reduce management charges
Engage with new landlords
Improve merchandise arrangement by moving back to Ricoh and restocking
Sensible ticket options/prices
Then I might become a regular again !
So at present you are an occasional but if they do all of that you'd be a regular, is that right?
From zero to zero?
£5.6 million of Administration Expenses ?? What the Feck is that then ?
£5.6 million of Administration Expenses ?? What the Feck is that then ?
£5.6m is staff cost. Includes players, manager, stewards etc.
£5.6m is staff cost. Includes players, manager, stewards etc.
£5.6 million of Administration Expenses ?? What the Feck is that then ?
4.6m for staff and 5.6mill for administration expenses
How on earth can the core mission of a business be deemed "admin expenses"?
Or maybe that means from the 5.6 million, 4.6 million is staff costs?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?