He could probably put a shift in at the ticket office too.
I’ve thought Maatsen has looked god for a kid playing his first games at this level. His emerges is exemplary.If he’s comfortable at Lwb then he may well challenge Maatsen for his spot as he hasn’t looked great so far, although it’s still early days for him.
Have you seen us play this season ?If he’s comfortable at Lwb then he may well challenge Maatsen for his spot as he hasn’t looked great so far, although it’s still early days for him.
Everyone?Isn’t that why everyone loved Max?
Yes more than most I’d hope, but Why do you ask that? Please don’t suggest that maatsen has looked particularly good defensively or had much end product going forward. He’s dribbled the ball out more times than he’s hit the keeper with crosses which is saying something.Have you seen us play this season ?
Why would we play a predominantly right footed right back at left wing back? Maatsen has improved in each game, so you remember how shit Sterling and Dabo were at first? He’s started better than both of them when they first arrivedYes more than most I’d hope, but Why do you ask that? Please don’t suggest that maatsen has looked particularly good defensively or had much end product going forward. He’s dribbled the ball out more times than he’s hit the keeper with crosses which is saying something.
He’s young and it’s early days so hopefully he’ll improve but if Kane comes in and is better then why not play him, especially if he’s our player rather than a loan.
And this is a level higher too.Why would we play a predominantly right footed right back at left wing back? Maatsen has improved in each game, so you remember how shit Sterling and Dabo were at first? He’s started better than both of them when they first arrived
He’s played plenty of championship games ??And this is a level higher too.
He’s referring to MaatsenHe’s played plenty of championship games ??
Takes me back to Marc Edworthy!Why would we play a predominantly right footed right back at left wing back? Maatsen has improved in each game, so you remember how shit Sterling and Dabo were at first? He’s started better than both of them when they first arrived
I don’t think Todd Kane if we sign him is being signed to be right back and right back alone he can and has played across the back line and in midfield so his versatility is the value.
Just lately Dabo has played in the back three twice again another playing option.
I don’t think Todd Kane if we sign him is being signed to be right back and right back alone he can and has played across the back line and in midfield so his versatility is the value.
Just lately Dabo has played in the back three twice again another playing option.
What is it with you and playing full backs in midfield @MagwitchI don’t think Todd Kane if we sign him is being signed to be right back and right back alone he can and has played across the back line and in midfield so his versatility is the value.
Just lately Dabo has played in the back three twice again another playing option.
I don’t think Todd Kane if we sign him is being signed to be right back and right back alone he can and has played across the back line and in midfield so his versatility is the value.
Just lately Dabo has played in the back three twice again another playing option.
My cousin is a QPR fan. Says he’s never seen him play because he moved to Bristol to become a driving instructor and stopped closely following QPR in the mid 80s.I have QPR mate who reckons he’s okay, which one do you believe ?
Reckons Kane is a right c**t.
I didn’t pick him there CD by the way not midfield Robins didWhat is it with you and playing full backs in midfield @Magwitch
But can he play left c**t ?
Not to be sniffed atHe's a utility c**t
Dabo at CB has already cost us a goal in each game it's happened
He wasnt at fault at all in the game
against Forest. Damage already done, he could only have scored an own goal if he got anything on it.
You monkeyMakes sense now Hamer is off.
Who is Tom Ross?Todd Kane is signing on a perm deal according to Tom Ross.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?