Unpleasant for the player, but it was not a stamp - that suggests increased force - yes he trod on him, but eyes were looking elsewhere (significant or not I don't know, but if he had been looking down then I think it would have been more incriminating)> Only the player knows if it were deliberate or not - I think the replay is inconclusive re: intentIf a notts county player had done that would be crying. I mean ffs youndont like shirt pulling but a stamp is ok hahha
Just admit you are bias and it clouds your judgement
Unpleasant for the player, but it was not a stamp - that suggests increased force - yes he trod on him, but eyes were looking elsewhere (significant or not I don't know, but if he had been looking down then I think it would have been more incriminating)> Only the player knows if it were deliberate or not - I think the replay is inconclusive re: intent
I don't believe it was deliberate anyway.What rubbish he didn’t stamp on him he put his foot down and his leg was there
DisagreeI've just seen it and it is definitely deliberate.
He steps on him rather than stamps on him, but in my opinion there is definite intent.
I think along with lashing out at Forte he'll cop a ban for this
I am just saying it wasn't a stamp, you numpty!If a notts county player had done that would be crying. I mean ffs youndont like shirt pulling but a stamp is ok hahha
Just admit you are bias and it clouds your judgement
Didn't Duffy say it wasn't a deliberate stamp in a post-match interview?Notts County have asked the FA to look into Davies' stamp on Duffy and his kick out at Forte.
He said he accepted it was an accident.Didn't Duffy say it wasn't a deliberate stamp in a post-match interview?
I've just seen it and it is definitely deliberate.
He steps on him rather than stamps on him, but in my opinion there is definite intent.
I think along with lashing out at Forte he'll cop a ban for this
You would hope ccfc would have that to hand if anything comes of it. There will be plenty more if they went back through the game.Nope. Not for me.
Cannot see how you could prove that was deliberate. Say it's sky blue spectacles if you like, but I assure you if it had been switched, I'd still be saying the same thing. I cannot in anyway be persuaded that that was a deliberate stamp.If anything, it looks like he took a look down to try and miss him but such was his hurry to get back, he clumsily stepped on him. If he gets banned for this, then Ameobi should be arrested for assault, because his elbow was CLEARLY deliberate, and 100 times worse.
If you look at it without the sky blue glasses on, it was clearly intentional, IMO. If it was against us we would be raging.
I was sure he did look down. He did, didn't he?You can't see any intent, he doesn't even look down. I know what you mean though, you'd reasonably expect somebody to look down to check they weren't going to tread on someone!
I was sure he did look down. He did, didn't he?
I would assume we didn't report Ameobi at their place.Looking on here people can’t agree so how can the panel?
Saying that I think he will get a ban as the football league are total twats
I am just saying it wasn't a stamp, you numpty!
I didn't see it on the night and Grendel was saying it was a stamp. Well it wasn't.
I was saying it is not as bad as first made out.
I would assume we didn't report Ameobi at their place.
Bet we wished we did now.
It was in the highlights within 48 hours.How could we? We’d have had to have known about the incident at the time - I assume something emerged later.
I am talking about the word stamp. He trod on him, he didn't stamp.It was - he deliberately stood on his leg - by FL definition if they decide this was intentional it’s a ban
Not sure how the panel works but if they need a unanimous vote then I doubt they’ll be successful.
Disagree re Willis/McDonald being suitable replacements for Davies. I’ve seen them get bullied too many times.
It was in the highlights within 48 hours.
I am talking about the word stamp. He trod on him, he didn't stamp.
No not as far as I'm aware just some inches in the Nottingham Post, plus the original furore on Sky which was nearly three days ago.Have we had official confirmation that County are contesting it? I would if I were them as it adds confusion to our game plan and is an extra thing for Robins to think about this week.
Willis is more aggressive, I'd go with him.
McDonald has been far too lax recently, he's had two good runs and two poor runs of games this season. Seems to get complacent.
Yes, true. I'm sure that will be the case.That’s going to be the accusation
I posted it within 5 minutes of it happeningHow could we? We’d have had to have known about the incident at the time - I assume something emerged later.
I posted it within 5 minutes of it happening
Doesn't matter if it's televised or not. All games are on camera, clubs will have even more access.Makes no difference. That’s never going to fulfil the requirements - very rarely are incidents successfully reported in non televised games
Doesn't matter if it's televised or not. All games are on camera, clubs will have even more access.
Which process?It does due to the way the process is structured - very few cases are looked at unless on live TV
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?