Might mean him being unavailable for the final though if we appeal.The difficulty could be the timing. Other games only 3 days apart and not enough time for charge and appeal, so we shouldn't be treated any differently simply because we have 6 days between. I would certainly cite that as part of any appeal process and difficult for them to impose unless 100% certain and whatever your view there is definitely a grey area regards intent.
'Caught on camera.'From the FA player handbook:
RETROSPECTIVE ACTION
• Please note that The FA has the power to take retrospective action for sending off offences which were not witnessed by the Match Officials.
• Players run the risk of being banned retrospectively particularly where such an incident is caught on camera.
• The FA may take action even where an incident has been witnessed or acted upon by Match Officials in very serious or unusual cases. In such circumstances lengthy bans may result.
'Caught on camera.'
Doesn't say owt about live TV does it.
Sky didn't even show it in their 30 min highlights programme the next morning
I am talking about the word stamp. He trod on him, he didn't stamp.
I think Willis can ably cover, though I would say Davies is the better player of the two.I agree it was not a stamp
I think he deliberately stood on him, he could have avoided his leg if has chosen to.
Big difference between a stamp and want Davies did.
However. I bet he gets banned. Harsh lesson for a young player
Have a bad feeling about it.
Good job we have cover in Willis and McDonald
Extra match ban on appeals not overturned I thinkI would make a stance on this and next season appeal for everything no matter how trivial and totally waste the time of the appeals panel. I would also appeal that Forte swung an arm in the other incident and try for a ban for him.
A too panel of former officials will now review the footage and detrrmine whether it incurs a ban?For a charge to follow the decision must be unanimous. So they are reviewing it but not said he's guilty of anything yet. Surely there is enough doubt in there for 1 of them to say it wasn't a red card offence.
I think he meant appeal for every time we get roughed up in games. The FA would either be dealing with 20 things a week, sort their refs out or let things slide.Extra match ban on appeals not overturned I think
Extra match ban on appeals not overturned I think
If it's former prem refs then we're screwed, any contact in that league is a foul but we've just been through a season of our players being assaulted every game and got nothing. It would be a joke if we were now being punished.A too panel of former officials will now review the footage and detrrmine whether it incurs a ban?
I think he meant appeal for every time we get roughed up in games. The FA would either be dealing with 20 things a week, sort their refs out or let things slide.
he was never going to get away with it ,,, complete idiot
FA Spokesperson@FAspokesperson 54m54 minutes ago
[1/2] Coventry City’s Tom Davies has been charged with violent conduct following a 21st minute incident in Saturday’s game against Notts County [12/05/18]. It was not seen by the match officials but caught on video. He has until 6pm on Tuesday [15/05/18] to respond.
Now that’s absolutely trueWe may as well appeal it. If we don't, he misses the next game and the final if we get there.
What an arbitrary decision. If this was a normal league fixture nothing would have happened. It's a sham trial of public opinion.
Has nobody got a link to stamp, haven't seen it back yet
Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
What are you on about, even Duffy said after the match it was accidental! Presumably there will also be a charge for the assault on McNulty?he was never going to get away with it ,,, complete idiot
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?