Tom Lawrence (2 Viewers)

Forums New posts
Nick

Nick

Administrator
Is he going to be banned or will it be ok because it's Wayne Rooney's Derby?
 
clint van damme

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
Nick said:
Is he going to be banned or will it be ok because it's Wayne Rooney's Derby?
Click to expand...

It seems to be OK no matter who it is along as Its not Godden. Absolutely embarrassing for the EFL.
Hopefully weetabix balloon head fucks off when they get relegated.
 
Liquid Gold

Liquid Gold

Well-Known Member
The EFL are a fucking joke but why aren't we shouting it form the rooftops.

Every interview they should be highlighting it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AOM
clint van damme

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
covcity4life said:
Just explaining no one else agrees because like I said it wasn't a crazy decision in the first place. Goddens was much worse hence the media coverage it got. Stop crying seriously.
Click to expand...

I think they're wrong, simple as that. Don't think its a conspiracy, just bad refereeing.
As for Godden, there have been plenty as bad which have not received any punishment, again, don't think its a conspiracy against Cov, just poor from the EFL.

But you keep watching quest and being guided by the oracle that is Colin Murray!
 
covcity4life

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
clint van damme said:
I think they're wrong, simple as that. Don't think its a conspiracy, just bad refereeing.
As for Godden, there have been plenty as bad which have not received any punishment, again, don't think its a conspiracy against Cov, just poor from the EFL.

But you keep watching quest and being guided by the oracle that is Colin Murray!
Click to expand...
I said it was a pen in the match thread before the show aired so how can I be guided by him? You are talking so much nonsense. Are you drunk?

Also I think it's a pen. TV companies think it's a pen. So how can you expect a ban? Godden one everyone agreed including cov fans that he dived that's why he got a ban

It's not poor from the EFL. It's just a somewhat soft pen and nothing more. Wether you agree or not it's clear why there will be no retrospective action. You can't argue against this point surely?
 
Terry Gibson's perm

Terry Gibson's perm

Well-Known Member
It’s the other instance in our game they should look at the winger that threw himself to the ground in the box which the ref didn’t give.

The Lawrence one which whatever quest say was never a penalty it was a decision given by a ref who had been pressured by Rooney who said he had to give one of the three.
 
Earlsdon_Skyblue1

Earlsdon_Skyblue1

Well-Known Member
covcity4life said:
I said it was a pen in the match thread before the show aired so how can I be guided by him? You are talking so much nonsense. Are you drunk?

Also I think it's a pen. TV companies think it's a pen. So how can you expect a ban? Godden one everyone agreed including cov fans that he dived that's why he got a ban

It's not poor from the EFL. It's just a somewhat soft pen and nothing more. Wether you agree or not it's clear why there will be no retrospective action. You can't argue against this point surely?
Click to expand...

My view of it now is pretty much exactly what it was at the time. Sheaf planted his foot in front of Lawrence and he went for a tumble.

It was very soft, but they get given. I don't think it is as controversial as some are suggesting.

It definitely had some dark arts about it, but both Maatsen and Sheaf helped enable it. Like Hull however, we weren't really good enough throughout the game, so the moaning is a bit moot.
 
clint van damme

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
covcity4life said:
I said it was a pen in the match thread before the show aired so how can I be guided by him? You are talking so much nonsense. Are you drunk?

Also I think it's a pen. TV companies think it's a pen. So how can you expect a ban? Godden one everyone agreed including cov fans that he dived that's why he got a ban

It's not poor from the EFL. It's just a somewhat soft pen and nothing more. Wether you agree or not it's clear why there will be no retrospective action. You can't argue against this point surely?
Click to expand...

Am I drunk?!
Are you saying Godden at Fulham was the only penalty incident this season that deserved retrospective action?

Why do you keep mentioning TV companies? Are they your guiding lights?!
 
covcity4life

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
Earlsdon_Skyblue1 said:
My view of it now is pretty much exactly what it was at the time. Sheaf planted his foot in front of Lawrence and he went for a tumble.

It was very soft, but they get given. I don't think it is as controversial as some are suggesting.

It definitely had some dark arts about it, but both Maatsen and Sheaf helped enable it. Like Hull however, we weren't really good enough throughout the game, so the moaning is a bit moot.
Click to expand...
Totally agree. Both o hare and sheaf clumsy and he made the most of it. That's modern footy for ya
 
covcity4life

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
clint van damme said:
Am I drunk?!
Are you saying Godden at Fulham was the only penalty incident this season that deserved retrospective action?

Why do you keep mentioning TV companies? Are they your guiding lights?!
Click to expand...
Sigh. I am saying this one doesn't deserve retrospective action as that's what this thread is about.
 
Sick Boy

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
Earlsdon_Skyblue1 said:
My view of it now is pretty much exactly what it was at the time. Sheaf planted his foot in front of Lawrence and he went for a tumble.

It was very soft, but they get given. I don't think it is as controversial as some are suggesting.

It definitely had some dark arts about it, but both Maatsen and Sheaf helped enable it. Like Hull however, we weren't really good enough throughout the game, so the moaning is a bit moot.
Click to expand...
McSheffrey used to be a master of it in the early 00s. There must have been a bit of self-loathing going on at the time.
 
Terry Gibson's perm

Terry Gibson's perm

Well-Known Member
If none of decisions deserve any action then we have to say nor did Godden’s there have been loads of other occasions this season so t was trial by tv.
 
1

13th_choice_seamer

Well-Known Member
Nobody in the away end yesterday was moaning/protesting the penalty decision. I do find that crowd reaction is often a reliable guide to whether a decision is fair or not.
 
P

Porkchophill

Well-Known Member
Looked to me that Derby were looking for any slight contact in and around the penalty area ,therefore trying to con the ref .. and would be interesting to see how many retrospective bans have been implemented this season across the leagues .. That is the problem with the EFL consistency
 
Terry Gibson's perm

Terry Gibson's perm

Well-Known Member
Porkchophill said:
Looked to me that Derby were looking for any slight contact in and around the penalty area ,therefore trying to con the ref .. and would be interesting to see how many retrospective bans have been implemented this season across the leagues .. That is the problem with the EFL consistency
Click to expand...


I bet it’s not many more than one. It’s the efl they mix and match there own rules Derby we’re supposed to tell them how they are planning to end the season they just didn’t bother band kicked it into the long grass.

It looks like the administration team have now contacted the efl way past the required date but haven’t released how they plan to do it.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)
Top