Westendlad
Well-Known Member
Good on her but she only spoke out about a year ago. What about before that ?
Good on her but she only spoke out about a year ago. What about before that ?Given the excellent work by Sarah Campion as an example clearly yes
One wants to destroy western life the other wants to protect it.Why is it sickening they are two peas in a pod
Which press ? Link please.
No i meant the link from all the national papers or tv news on the case TR was reporting on before it was on social media after he was arrested.They’ve been put on here a dozen times already. Even his own legal team acknowledge on his behalf that he’d got knowledge about the case in what had been covered in the press. They’re admitting that he’s pulling the wool over the eyes of his believers when they repeat his mantra that he’s doing some sort of public service that the press won’t. Something that’s been pointed out dozens of times on here (mainly by CD) with numerous links. He’s a poor mans David Blain (Robinson that is not CD) who tricks people into believing that he’s doing something he isn’t.
Given the excellent work by Sarah Campion as an example clearly yes
I was about to 'like' until your last sentence of drivel..Her work on this subject has been incredible and credible, even bringing in changes in the law to make it easier for child offenders to be convicted. I’d think your average Robinson follower hasn’t even heard of her.
Good on her but she only spoke out about a year ago. What about before that ?
Yours would read.....I'm such a boring chap please give me book on how to be less boring'.
I was about to 'like' until your last sentence of drivel..
No i meant the link from all the national papers or tv news on the case TR was reporting on before it was on social media after he was arrested.
Tony. Your new name is 'wiki man'........That is what i shall call you from now onSo was I. It was covered right up until the press blackout was called when the trials were started to ensure that the convictions were safe. It was covered plenty. I put links up and so did Dave. Tommy Robinson only showed an interest once the media ban was called. At which point he pretended that he’s doing some sort of public service exposing something that the media won’t cover. That’s why it’s a con trick, that’s why he’s a poor mans David Blain and that’s why he’s full of shit. His legal team has even just confirmed it. You carry on believing him but it’s a stupid man who carries on believing a con artist even when the con artist confesses to the con.
I rest my case.................It wouldn't. I'm not a racist who would be locked up in prison whilst being hero worshipped by other thick racists.
I do like a good book though so you're spot on there. You should learn to read. You'd love it.
Tony. Your new name is 'wiki man'........That is what i shall call you from now on
Still no links wiki man...They’ve been put on here a dozen times already. Even his own legal team acknowledge on his behalf that he’d got knowledge about the case in what had been covered in the press. They’re admitting that he’s pulling the wool over the eyes of his believers when they repeat his mantra that he’s doing some sort of public service that the press won’t. Something that’s been pointed out dozens of times on here (mainly by CD) with numerous links. He’s a poor mans David Blain (Robinson that is not CD) who tricks people into believing that he’s doing something he isn’t.
I provided you the links the last time you asked the same question in this thread. Take a look at post #98.Which press ? Link please.
Or did you mean a link to him using the fact that the names were already public, and therefore negating the argument he needed to somehow expose a cover up, in his defence of the contempt charge?Which press ? Link please.
https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/yaxley-lennon-full-judgment-1.pdfCounsel suggested that in referring to the defendants and the charges, the appellant had been reading from a local newspaper report, still freely available online, which predated the reporting restriction, and which identified the defendants and the charges they faced.
This question has been asked numerous times in the thread but never answered. Can you name a single case that Robinson has been the first to 'expose'?Hand on heart. Were you aware of the Pakistani grooming gangs before Robinson exposed them ?
This question has been asked numerous times in the thread but never answered. Can you name a single case that Robinson has been the first to 'expose'?
It gets better.View attachment 10285
Where are people getting a breakdown of prison population based on religion for individual prisons?
I can't even find any reliable data for the prison population overall.
The official government figures show religion isn't recorded for over 40% of prisoners and we know, and have discussed at length in the past, that studies show muslim prisoners are far more likely to have their religion recorded making figures with such a large unrecorded element useless.
Where are people getting a breakdown of prison population based on religion for individual prisons?
I can't even find any reliable data for the prison population overall.
The official government figures show religion isn't recorded for over 40% of prisoners and we know, and have discussed at length in the past, that studies show muslim prisoners are far more likely to have their religion recorded making figures with such a large unrecorded element useless.
Those reports are government reports compiled from the MoJ figures I referenced above. When people have looked in greater detail to try and ascertain why Muslims were over represented it was found that muslim was often being recorded as religion without asking the prissier in question but based on their ethnicity. They also found that people that non muslims were a lot less likely to have their religion recorded. When the raw data is flawed anything you build on that data will also be flawed.Must try harder..
Found by googling "parliament research prison population religion" etc.
Those reports are government reports compiled from the MoJ figures I referenced above. When people have looked in greater detail to try and ascertain why Muslims were over represented it was found that muslim was often being recorded as religion without asking the prissier in question but based on their ethnicity. They also found that people that non muslims were a lot less likely to have their religion recorded. When the raw data is flawed anything you build on that data will also be flawed.
Saying that the 15% could be correct. It would mean if Robinson was in a prison for those from his area, Luton, which has a Muslim population of 25% according to the last census compared to 4% nationwide then that prison having a Muslim population of around 30% would be statistically consistent and therefore not some deliberate ploy by the government to put him in danger.
Saying that the 15% could be correct. It would mean if Robinson was in a prison for those from his area, Luton, which has a Muslim population of 25% according to the last census compared to 4% nationwide then that prison having a Muslim population of around 30% would be statistically consistent and therefore not some deliberate ploy by the government to put him in danger.
Where are people getting a breakdown of prison population based on religion for individual prisons?
I can't even find any reliable data for the prison population overall.
The official government figures show religion isn't recorded for over 40% of prisoners and we know, and have discussed at length in the past, that studies show muslim prisoners are far more likely to have their religion recorded making figures with such a large unrecorded element useless.
And straight away we have an apologist, denying official figures are true.Those reports are government reports compiled from the MoJ figures I referenced above. When people have looked in greater detail to try and ascertain why Muslims were over represented it was found that muslim was often being recorded as religion without asking the prissier in question but based on their ethnicity. They also found that people that non muslims were a lot less likely to have their religion recorded. When the raw data is flawed anything you build on that data will also be flawed.
Saying that the 15% could be correct. It would mean if Robinson was in a prison for those from his area, Luton, which has a Muslim population of 25% according to the last census compared to 4% nationwide then that prison having a Muslim population of around 30% would be statistically consistent and therefore not some deliberate ploy by the government to put him in danger.
This was discussed in detail the last time these figures were used on here and from memory there were three studies done that showed the raw data to be unreliable due to collection method or in many cases lack of collection.You are claiming the statistics are flawed. Where’s your evidence? Any links to academic research that has investigated whether the data are reliable?
I'm not denying they are true, i'm querying the collection methodology, as those with many years experience with statistics have done.And straight away we have an apologist, denying official figures are true.
I promised myself i wouldn't bother with this thread today but seriously Nick...Why would it matter ? And whats he lied about ?What does the percentage of Muslims in the prison be went to matter? He comes from a town with a massively high population of Muslims.
He's already been found out as lying about things to exaggerate it or just straight up lie.
3 out of 4 were Yorkshire papers ( Personally i don't read Yorkshire papers) and 1 was the Daily Mail ONLINE........I asked for links on the national news and papers.I provided you the links the last time you asked the same question in this thread. Take a look at post #98.
Exactly, why is it all being made about Muslims and trying to torture him?I promised myself i wouldn't bother with this thread today but seriously Nick...Why would it matter ? And whats he lied about ?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?