I'd go along with most of thisNot really - he’s a convicted fraudster and oddly seems to have several aliases.
His interest in justice is I think racially motivated. I do believe some aspects of the Pakistan community do have an issue with grooming and abuse which needs addressing. I’m not sure though that someone whose campaigning is really motivated by a dislike of other races should be a role model for anyone.
What differentiates the Pakistani paedophile gangs is that their victims are chosen from an ethnic group that they fundamentally see as inferior to them and dirty even. The nazi undertones to this frighten me more than some ex football hooligan who likes the sound of his own voice
You assume wrong my friend. Anyone with young daughters should be raising a drink to this man.
Arrested in court and 13months within an hour what I've read online .Still trying to find out if its fact that he's been sent down, that breach of the peace offence is a strange one, you could seriously hurt someone and still get a lesser sentence. The powers to be have been trying to shut him up for years....shit scared that he might upset the 'minority' population....
Very salient last paragraph Tony and I do think that forms the narrative .The joke here of course is the notion that he’s some hero of the people exposing paedophile gangs. It’s bollocks. Aside from the obvious that he’s filming them as they go into court means he isn’t exposing anyone the fact that they’re paedophiles is secondary to almost irrelevant. He’s targeting them because they’re Muslims. If them being paedophiles was the factor driving him he’d be targeting the Catholic Church, the Church of England, the BBC, the establishment that allowed paedophile gangs to establish themselves in the care system and specifically carehomes. To my knowledge he’s never given any of those more than a passing comment if even that let alone pursue them with cameras. If these men were Muslims he’d be all over it.
That would depend on what was the initial offence he was on probation for I guess .Nothing to do with free speech though. He broke the terms of his probation and that caused him to be locked up. He was disrupting a trial. The people being tried are scum, but the legal system has to take it’s course.
If he wasn’t a known criminal with a suspended sentence, he would still be outside.
That would depend on what was the initial offence he was on probation for I guess .
Was that freedom of speech related? IHDK.
https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/coc-yaxley-lennon-20170522.pdfThis contempt hearing is not about free speech. This is not about the freedom of the press. This is not about legitimate journalism; this is not about political correctness; this is not about whether one political viewpoint is right or another. It is about justice, and it is about ensuring that a trial can be carried out justly and fairly. It is about ensuring that a jury are not in any way inhibited from carrying out their important function. It is about being innocent until proven guilty. It is not about people prejudging a situation and going round to that court and publishing material, whether in print or online, referring to defendants as "Muslim paedophile rapists". A legitimate journalist would not be able to do that and under the strict liability rule there would be no defence to publication in those terms. It is pejorative language which prejudges the case, and it is language and reporting - if reporting indeed is what it is - that could have had the effect of substantially derailing the trial. As I have already indicated, because of what I knew was going on I had to take avoiding action in order to make sure that the integrity of this trial was preserved, that justice was preserved and that the trial could continue to completion without people being intimidated into reaching conclusions about it, or into being affected by "irresponsible and inaccurate reporting". If something of the nature of that which you put out on social media had been put into the mainstream press I would have been faced with applications from the advocates concerned, I have no doubt, to either say something specific to the jury, or worse, to abandon the trial and to start again. That is the kind of thing that actions such as these can and do have, and that is why you have been dealt with in the way in which you have and why I am dealing with this case with the seriousness which I am.
God that's wordy .
What differentiates the Pakistani paedophile gangs is that their victims are chosen from an ethnic group that they fundamentally see as inferior to them and dirty even. The nazi undertones to this frighten me more than some ex football hooligan who likes the sound of his own voice
It takes a special kind of stupid to get done for exactly the same thing while on probation. Especially when its a location where you are guaranteed to be caught.So the same issue repeating itself.
It seems TR is aware in the prior on this occassion and has Martyred himself .
Funnily enough I go out of my way to avoid what Tommy Robinson has to say yet somehow I’m still aware of these Muslim Paedophile rape gangs using “normal” news outlets. Another myth from his followers.
1) If you know there is a problem, why do you ignore it and label people who don't?
2) You're not stupid enough to think these things are being covered properly, so therefore it must be stright up denial to suit your agenda I guess? This case is a prime example, why wasn't it being covered?
3) Just because someone is against a rife problem to do with childen being abused, it does not make then a 'follower' of Tommy Robinson.
1) I’m not ignoring it. I’m just not ignorant enough to be educated on it by the likes of Tommy Robinson.
2) who said it isn’t being covered? Tommy Robinson and his followers? Don’t make me laugh.
3) if you’re only interest is covering Muslim paedophiles instead of all paedophiles regardless of race or religion then you’re problem isn’t with paedophiles. You’re problem is with Muslims.
You could have saved yourself a lot of typing and just written 'I'm a grooming gang apologist because I have a biased agenda which I cannot drop.'
It's not even naivety from you, you know exactly what you are doing and you are part of the problem. The funny thing is, if it wasn't for Robinson in this circumsrance, no one would know about this case. Your beloved Independent didn't want to cover it, but was quite happy to have a bash at TR, which is quite a common occurrence.
Carry on trying to plead otherwise though. You're making yourself look silly.
You could have saved yourself a lot of typing and just written 'I'm a grooming gang apologist because I have a biased agenda which I cannot drop.'
It's not even naivety from you, you know exactly what you are doing and you are part of the problem. The funny thing is, if it wasn't for Robinson in this circumsrance, no one would know about this case. Your beloved Independent didn't want to cover it, but was quite happy to have a bash at TR, which is quite a common occurrence.
Carry on trying to plead otherwise though. You're making yourself look silly.
LOLWhy does he seem to only cover Muslim sex offenders? He couldn't care less about the victims of abuse, he hijacks them to spread his message of hatred.
Why does he seem to only cover Muslim sex offenders? He couldn't care less about the victims of abuse, he hijacks them to spread his message of hatred.
Macca, He doesn't hate muslims.The reason he does? Probably because he hates Muslims. Reason I do is because there is proven evidence of it being dealt with poorly. Me personally I hate the fact that a lot of people in positions of influence have the horn for one particular religion. Almost an obsession. It's bizarre. You don't see the same obsession with Sikhism or Hinduism so assume it's not a PC thing....weird and sure it's a recent development of last 10-15 years
LOLAny evidence of him turning up at the trials of white British men for sexual abuse and rape? No, I thought not.
Macca, He doesn't hate muslims.
LOL
LOLLOL.
You're either incredibly naive or just a thick c**t.
Ssssh now......You bore me. Good boy.I don't find a man who founded an organisation that is routinely seen giving Nazi salutes in public as funny. Each to their own I suppose.
Ssssh now......You bore me. Good boy.
LOLI'm sure we will soon be seeing Robinson pop up at the trial of a white sex offender soon and all the photos of EDL members doing Nazi salutes are photoshopped- hahaha!
You talk bollocks....Which bit is wrong? The fraud, the false names, the association with football violence, the hate speech?
I've got daughters but I'm not so scared of the world to need people like him on my side.
He preys on the vulnerable too, by peddling the myth of 'the other' coming here to take our jobs and our women and our very culture etc., and that he's the only person brave enough to challenge them. It's a very old story and if you can scare enough people into doing something stupid, a very dangerous one.
I'm not unaware of the Pakistani grooming gangs and it's not acceptable to get a pass on criminal behaviour because of your culture or religion. But I don't need people like Robinson to speak up on it for me; he's in it to justify his own personal hatred and I'm not falling for it.
Why does he seem to only cover Muslim sex offenders? He couldn't care less about the victims of abuse, he hijacks them to spread his message of hatred.
It is true that he doesn't like Islam as an ideology, but he has studied it intensively and has a right to hold those opinions if he wants to.
One of the main reasons he covers these cases is because they are often covered up by a politically correct police force or also the biased media.
Of course I would want to see any groomers locked up, but that isn't the point here. The point is that sexual abusers of South Asian (muslim) backgrounds are worryingly overpopulated in the statistics and this is being swept under the carpet. They've thrown TR in prison for the simple reason that they want to shut him up.
I'm not a fan of any particular religion personally and would like to see practices like circumcision of newborn babies banned.
There's a problem with sexual assault across all sections of society, just look at the cover ups of cases in the church and the bbc, it's not confined to one section of society.
Yeah, everyone knows sexual predators can come in all forms from all backgrounds, but that's not the point here.
The point is that sexual predators from a Muslim background are massively overrepresented in the statistics. Couple in the denial and massive coverups and there you have a massive problem.
Maajid Navaz actually said this is largely a racism thing towards white girls. That's not even come from me, but if it is true, shows the problem is even worse.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?