But highlighting the issue isn’t and many people are uncomfortable with saying it. Pakistan men thing white girls are trash and are there purely for sexual gratification and exploitation
But highlighting the issue isn’t and many people are uncomfortable with saying it. Pakistan men thing white girls are trash and are there purely for sexual gratification and exploitation
People are seemingly more focused on trying to find reasons for getting TR into jail, than the actual severity of these crimes.
It's certainly looking as if some people are uncomfortable with the people that are committing so many of these crimes being from those backgrounds and are therefore making excuses or deflecting away from the truth.
I can almost guarantee some of the people on here would not be saying the same things if the religion/ethnic roles were reversed.
I’m uncomfortable with all sex offenders myself. I don’t discriminate based on colour, religion or country of heritage/birth. That’s the difference between me and Tommy Robinson. He’s only concerned when the perpetrators are of a particular colour, religion or country of heritage/birth.
The fact is muslims do have a problem in their communities with grooming gangs and it does need highlighting. I don' particularly like TR but I don' agree with supressing hum too. Claiming it' nit widespread or using the term 'Asian' I find more insulting since Sikhs Hindus Chinese etc dint have this issue but people are scared to label and it only makes things worse. It needs eradicating and we need the help if other Muslim groups to expose and bring them to justice if they want to be accepted as not being part of supporting and harbouring.
The difference is you prefer a white sex offender, as it suits your narrative.
When multiple large groups of men from these backgrounds commit serious offences your cowardly, self-loathing self cannot deal with it.
Seems he favours ethnic minority ones, given he keeps trying to get them off!It’s Robinson who favours white sex offenders not me.
I had to stop half way through the first one.Time to dig deeper and maybe join the dots.
And what has this video below got to do with Tommy Robinson/
Let's just say watch the whole of it and you're know .
So the police arrested a man for trying to report on a story they didn't want reported on, threw him in prison instantly under a suspended sentence of doing the same thing some time ago, and then went around the press telling them to pull stories of the arrest.
Take away the fact that it's Tommy Robinson we're talking about, and anyone would be either disgusted or thinking that we're talking about the USSR.
Absolutely Orwellian behaviour from the police.
Are you serious? You do realise he could have ended up letting these people walk free?
Are you serious? You do realise he could have ended up letting these people walk free?
Seems he favours ethnic minority ones, given he keeps trying to get them off!
Seriously, what kind of idiot tries to stop a criminal receiving justice?
I had to stop half way through the first one.
I'm no fan of Nationalism or particularly what's called Patriotism.
For me the concept of the EU Is the right one or way to make peace and keep it
For me I feel it's dissintegration both suits and assists American Imperialist goals, possibly aided by their deep state.
That kind of puts me at odds with the second video as I largely agree with this guys assessment over their other World aspirations and being outmanouvered by Trump ..
Personally for me I'm so close to the concept of EU and distant from a Special relationship with USA.
It's far too destabalising outside of the perceived wrongs attributed to the EU, I'd overide the 52%opinion of those who vote for Brexit and wouldn't give a fig how that made them feel about me or so called democracy.
I have lived through 42 years of EU membership in one form or another.
I have never felt the threat my daughter 26 and grandson 9 are now being exposed to and I fear for them.
The rest isn't worth considering, it's piffling above a secure safe life, JMO
That's a nonsense argument.
If you read into it properly instead of just hearing the name 'Tommy Robinson' and getting triggered, you'll find all he said was the names of the criminals and the crimes they were listed for. This information was already released and therefore wasn't in breach of anything. Literally no court in the real world will call a mistrial on this basis.
Hang on, I thought the reason Robinson had to broadcast was that there was a big cover up going on and no details had been released anywhere?This information was already released and therefore wasn't in breach of anything.
Sorry mate, I like your contribution on here too and you're right It belongs on the other thread .I really like you wingy, but that is a shocking thing to say.
If I'm honest people now feel far from safe in the EU (look at Liege today), and the fact The EU doesn't care about democracy (reinforced by your opinion there) majorly contributed to the leave vote winning.
Anyway, this isn't the Brexit thread so perhaps we should save it for over there.
Hang on, I thought the reason Robinson had to broadcast was that there was a big cover up going on and no details had been released anywhere?
No it isn’t. The court issued a direction that no details should be allowed in the public domain as soon as the trial commenced as it may be deemed prejudicial. He also had a suspended sentence and was told if he committed the same act again he’d go to prison.
You do realise this character under one of his previous aliases put a boot through a policeman’s head and said it “was a fit up” as the policeman hadn’t identified himself as an officer of the law and was inducing the beating?
Why does he keep putting himself in these situations if he thinks the police and government are out to stop and imprison him at any chance? His line of thinking makes absolutely no sense to me. Why does he need to 'expose' them don't the names get released after their sentenced?
Its been stated several times in this thread that he has to take action such as this as nobody else is reporting on these cases. That he is bringing them to public attention. Yet its been shown on this thread that the cases he is 'exposing' are already being covered in the mainstream media.You're wasting time really, as you know that isn't correct.
The details TR announced were the same as what the court released. He said nothing further that would incriminate him or put the trial at risk.
Point two isn't relevant as the bloke is clearly a tosser. The argument isn't if he is an angel, more the fact he is having to do the work the rest of the media should be doing. The bigger picture behind that is the problem.
Why does he not use his real name?
He may not be very bright but it takes a special kind of stupid to be on a suspended sentence and then turn up at a court and do exactly the same thing again.He seems not a particularly bright fellow as I assume he wants to be some kind of martyr to free speech.
Its been stated several times in this thread that he has to take action such as this as nobody else is reporting on these cases. That he is bringing them to public attention. Yet its been shown on this thread that the cases he is 'exposing' are already being covered in the mainstream media.
So we come back to the question why does he do it and why is it only ever Muslim paedophiles he targets if its not racially motivated?
I've looked for non-Muslim cases he has highlighted but can't find any. I did find cases involving white British paedophiles in which he has been involved but bizarrely in those cases he has supported the accused.
Again - Restrictions were put in place which embargoed filming and live commentary of proceedings.
He ignored these restrictions and pleaded guilty. He seems not a particularly bright fellow as I assume he wants to be some kind of martyr to free speech.
The irony is his own trial was subject to restrictions which every press officer obeyed. No doubt if Mr Robinson had the opportunity he’d film his own trial so he can breach laws and again be a victim.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?