blitzer109
Member
What on earth happened to poor Tommy Robinson? 10 Things You Should Know.
A legal view of the affair
A legal view of the affair
He's started a lot of interviews with American right wingers like Alex Jones, Steven Crowder etc. All people who love a conspiracy and a straw man when one doesn't exist.
From memory I think there have been 17 cases prosecuted .What other mainstream media covered that trial? Absolutely none. It's a common theme and it's reinforced by the authorities who are scared of being called racist and have openly admitted they have swept previous incidents under the carpet.
You pick out a few articles of trials that have actually been covered and think you've won a losing argument, but the truth is far from that. If you really think Muslim grooming gangs are being covered openly and honestly then that's quite honestly pretty naive.
It's already been said that he doesn't like Islam which fuels part of his actions, but agree with that or not; The Muslim population of Britain is about 5%. Why are they involved in so many sexual abuse scandals, many that have been covered up? It should be flagged up. He might be biased but he's the only one with balls big enough to bring it to our attention.
What on earth happened to poor Tommy Robinson? 10 Things You Should Know.
A legal view of the affair
From memory I think there have been 17 cases prosecuted .
I have no Data available on how many have been hushed.
But what I will say is, clearly there are elements of Cultural attitudes in this.
The suggestion that religion plays a part I don't buy, that's a secondly consideration behind parochial attitudes towards women in general and especially with who they were targetting ,that may suggest a racial aspect in reverse but doesn't prove there is .
Secondly there has been plenty of coverage both about failures to act and what seemed to prompt that.
This is FOS /PC issue that's where his focus should concentrate not pulling stunts on court steps and the state playing into his hands.
I'm guessing these perpetrators are most likely second generation British Pakistani which is troubling
From memory I think there have been 17 cases prosecuted .
I have no Data available on how many have been hushed.
But what I will say is, clearly there are elements of Cultural attitudes in this.
The suggestion that religion plays a part I don't buy, that's a secondly consideration behind parochial attitudes towards women in general and especially with who they were targetting ,that may suggest a racial aspect in reverse but doesn't prove there is .
Secondly there has been plenty of coverage both about failures to act and what seemed to prompt that.
This is FOS /PC issue that's where his focus should concentrate not pulling stunts on court steps and the state playing into his hands.
I'm guessing these perpetrators are most likely second generation British Pakistani which is troubling
Interesting that with the mounting pile of sexual assault/harassment allegations coming out of the film/TV industry against predominantly white men (Bill Cosby excepted), nobody has played the race card. There are scumbags in all sections of society, coloured/white, rich/poor, Muslim/Christian. That's what Robinson and those like him can't reconcile with their pre-conceived notion of white Christian superiority.
The argument isn't that anyone of any background can't be a sexual abuser. Certainly these Hollywood scumbags are something else...
The argument is that these people in the UK make up just 5% of the population and are accountable for a worryingly high amount of these types of crime. Add in the cover ups and you've got a two fold problem that no one is talking honestly about.
But what percentage of that population do you think they represent .The argument isn't that anyone of any background can't be a sexual abuser. Certainly these Hollywood scumbags are something else...
The argument is that these people in the UK make up just 5% of the population and are accountable for a worryingly high amount of these types of crime. Add in the cover ups and you've got a two fold problem that no one is talking honestly about.
Sadly there are folk that think never happened and was a false flag .Recent statistics on this are annoyingly hard to come by so I don't know the proportions. It is great though that 'Robinson' wants to take a stand against sexual assault, but you must admit it's awkward that he only focuses on the cases committed by a demographic he has an inherent problem with. I am still yet to see a Muslim stab an MP to death in the street...
The Quinlan Foundation had figures of 84%of this particular type of crime attributed to this demographic .Recent statistics on this are annoyingly hard to come by so I don't know the proportions. It is great though that 'Robinson' wants to take a stand against sexual assault, but you must admit it's awkward that he only focuses on the cases committed by a demographic he has an inherent problem with. I am still yet to see a Muslim stab an MP to death in the street...
Sadly there are folk that think never happened and was a false flag .
People are seemingly more focused on trying to find reasons for getting TR into jail, than the actual severity of these crimes.
It's certainly looking as if some people are uncomfortable with the people that are committing so many of these crimes being from those backgrounds and are therefore making excuses or deflecting away from the truth.
I can almost guarantee some of the people on here would not be saying the same things if the religion/ethnic roles were reversed.
A biased view of the affair too I'm afraid.
Some of it was correct, but you could see which way that article was going from literally the first paragraph.
No doubt the same people critiquing TR for his one sideded reporting will have no issue with this though sadly.
I agree with a lot of that.
Not on the religion bit though. The whole 'your women will serve us as slaves' indicates a Koran influence. This is how they justify it in a lot of ways.
This is the thing when people try to say terrorists are home grown sometimes. They are usually second generation anyway. Indeed troubling.
Look in the Bible and chances are you'll find something similar.
How do you explain the number of abuse cases in the Church? These scumbags exist across all sections of society. Why has Robinson never got involved in the Catholic Church cover-up?
That line loss of Identity is featured in the headline of one of the daily's today in an article that IIRC cites it as one of our biggest concerns across society .The Bible justifies slavery and has been used for that purpose in the past, e.g. southern states in the US, and more recently for white domination in South Africa.
The Nazis were strongest in the catholic areas of Germany.
No surprise then that the people bemoaning the supposed loss of „identity“ are being selective and pointing the finger at people of another race or religion. Again.
That line loss of Identity is featured in the headline of one of the daily's today in an article that IIRC cites it as one of our biggest concerns across society .
Recent statistics on this are annoyingly hard to come by so I don't know the proportions. It is great though that 'Robinson' wants to take a stand against sexual assault, but you must admit it's awkward that he only focuses on the cases committed by a demographic he has an inherent problem with. I am still yet to see a Muslim stab an MP to death in the street...
But what percentage of that population do you think they represent .
Then the question folliws what are the opinions of them from within their communities?
Look in the Bible and chances are you'll find something similar.
How do you explain the number of abuse cases in the Church? These scumbags exist across all sections of society. Why has Robinson never got involved in the Catholic Church cover-up?
A biased view of the affair too I'm afraid.
Some of it was correct, but you could see which way that article was going from literally the first paragraph.
No doubt the same people critiquing TR for his one sideded reporting will have no issue with this though sadly.
Twitter An account from an actual reporter covering the trial of what happened,
How is this biased, this is a member of the legal profession stating facts. I see no conjecture or spin here.
'that were inevitably flooded through social media by his knuckle-dragging cheerleaders'
Yes, very balanced and fair article there. Not at all driven by this persons hate for the bloke!
You pick out one sentence yet ignore the rest of the article like it doesn't apply. I would say that what you quoted shows his distaste for the type of people that follow the likes of Tommy Robinson rather than "hate". Yes he could of chosen a better way to put this across BUT the facts of the case are there to see in both of the links I posted if you choose to ignore them then there is nothing further to say as there is no point in arguing with someone so blinded by their own prejudices.
They haven't.
Instead they drive cars into people, stab others, and in some circumstances blow up concerts.
The two are not comparable. You should also factor in the latter make up just 5% of the population.
There is a problem.
No, I'm about the only one who isn't trying to make excuses for the grooming gangs. You, and many others on here are so keen to push the negative Tommy Robinson agenda, no matter how biased and amateur it is, you refuse to acknowledge the problems coming from the muslim community and use this as a convinient excuse not to address it. It makes you uncomfortable.
And there are many white men across the pond who take to shooting tens of people in minutes. It doesn't alter the fact that he only points to crimes committed by a group he considers inferior to his own.
No, I'm about the only one who isn't trying to make excuses for the grooming gangs. You, and many others on here are so keen to push the negative Tommy Robinson agenda, no matter how biased and amateur it is, you refuse to acknowledge the problems coming from the muslim community and use this as a convinient excuse not to address it. It makes you uncomfortable.
You are continually missing the point on here as to why he does it and what makes it unique.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?