Nick
Administrator
Very dry and leathery but not boots
Very dry and leathery but not bootsOnce you get over 10,000 posts you get to lick Joy's boots.
Basically a portable building which just about sums up our owners . Easy movable low cost dressed up as a new ' building'
What's the significance of the GIF?Delighted with that gif actually. Gonna be my go to gif for the posters who pop up on the political threads but never on the match day.
Fucking hell. This place is like backstage at a drag contest when someone dares criticise our owners.
Criticise them for doing a good thing is what we’re supposed to do now yeah? OK.Fucking hell. This place is like backstage at a drag contest when someone dares criticise our owners.
What's the significance of the GIF?
I see a clever doggy bursting balloons.
Give over Shmeeeee.
Read the posts-nobody’s jumping on the fact that someone is criticising SISU.
Rather when everyone commenting positively on some good news about a Ryton upgrade some knobheads see it as an opportunity to rubbish good news that doesn’t fit the narrative.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
One post, which had about two pages from about five different people in response. Person A “I don’t like the owners” half the forum “You aren’t a real fan/here’s a section of gifs that show how I feel about you/random insults”. But yeah totally normal proportional reaction.
Portable stadiums are actually being talked about as possibly the next big thing in stadium builds.Looking forward to the new portable stadium
I'm shook that people would get jumped on when they come on a Coventry City forum to talk shit about Coventry City. I reckon if you signed up to a sewing forum and said it's all a load of bollocks, machines can do it now you'd probably be a target.One post, which had about two pages from about five different people in response. Person A “I don’t like the owners” half the forum “You aren’t a real fan/here’s a section of gifs that show how I feel about you/random insults”. But yeah totally normal proportional reaction.
Portable stadiums are actually being talked about as possibly the next big thing in stadium builds.
I'd certainly take something like this in Cov over a couple more years in Brum.
A few observations.
A few posters have mentioned that the upgrades are being crained in/prefabbed/temporary as a negative.
A lot of permanent house in Scandinavian/German built this way-cheaper but doesn’t affect quality.
Generally referred to as modular https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modular_building
Also the spin that posters can’t see in the telegraph article is definitely there.
It’s clearly a two part article-or ‘shit we can’t have a positive story about owner investment without bolting in some shit at the end’.
The spin is after the end of quoting Robins and how he says that’s brilliant to get (slightly) better facilities.
The CET could have ended the article there but...
The CET goes on to highlight that SISU had applied for planning permission to build houses at Ryton, part of that permission is to find alternative training ground blah blah blah.
SISU have found alternative land but have not revealed where.
CET does this all the time. Even the reports on our success tinged with barbed criticism.
All for the free press but this very obviously biased.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
One post, which had about two pages from about five different people in response. Person A “I don’t like the owners” half the forum “You aren’t a real fan/here’s a section of gifs that show how I feel about you/random insults”. But yeah totally normal proportional reaction.
Not to mention pointing out how it won't be a patch on Premier League training grounds, no shit sherlock.
It's amazing how hard people want to try and miss the point. Shmeee will be along banging on about conspiracies, Cloughie will be logging in every few months to try and act outraged about anything slightly positive and the Coventrian will be trying to fight anybody and everybody.
As FB suggested. These posters pop up for this type of thread and can't wait to burst the positivity balloon.What's the significance of the GIF?
I see a clever doggy bursting balloons.
Good post. I would if are using sips to build it. I guess some people aren’t up to speed on modern technics. I have even seen it used in grand designs for houses worth a million plus. How much I do distrust sisu. They seem to be pulling in the right direction. I sometimes wonder what my opinion would be if him if they had started out like this. What is interesting is that since joy had taken more of an active role with robins snd brody things have improved. Do you think they were mud guided. I’m still not a fan of them it’s just a question I have been asking myself.A few observations.
A few posters have mentioned that the upgrades are being crained in/prefabbed/temporary as a negative.
A lot of permanent house in Scandinavian/German built this way-cheaper but doesn’t affect quality.
Generally referred to as modular https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modular_building
Also the spin that posters can’t see in the telegraph article is definitely there.
It’s clearly a two part article-or ‘shit we can’t have a positive story about owner investment without bolting in some shit at the end’.
The spin is after the end of quoting Robins and how he says that’s brilliant to get (slightly) better facilities.
The CET could have ended the article there but...
The CET goes on to highlight that SISU had applied for planning permission to build houses at Ryton, part of that permission is to find alternative training ground blah blah blah.
SISU have found alternative land but have not revealed where.
CET does this all the time. Even the reports on our success tinged with barbed criticism.
All for the free press but this very obviously biased.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Good post. I would if are using sips to build it. I guess some people aren’t up to speed on modern technics. I have even seen it used in grand designs for houses worth a million plus. How much I do distrust sisu. They seem to be pulling in the right direction. I sometimes wonder what my opinion would be if him if they had started out like this. What is interesting is that since joy had taken more of an active role with robins snd brody things have improved. Do you think they were mud guided. I’m still not a fan of them it’s just a question I have been asking myself.
There are some who will be furious that we are in the automatic spot and that despite everything we are trotting along nicely. It suits their hate agenda with anything to do with the club.
I get the hatred for Sisu, I am in their camp historically on that score, but credit where it is due and some of that has to go to the owners, even if they are hands off by and large.
Let's be honest anything after 16-17 season has been progress and there were some who were predicting non league( not without some justification, granted)
In the words of that great philosopher, Yazz( with artistic license) the "only way was up" and so it has proved. Birmingham, if it is a one season aberration, is survivable and a new changing room at Ryton, whilst not a major development in the scheme of things, is further proof of the manager being supported.
Then let's hope Tony Cottee and Ian Wright never join us in any capacity....If they applied this warped logic to everything then they would slate every player & manager who ever joined us due to what they did in the past against us.
Someone tell Robins quick..... Stop operation Championship! Throw the games!Or puts more value on our club should she be thinking of selling.
Hello Mr Clough, our paths haven’t crossed before. Before I go any further in methodically taking your inane drivel to pieces, could you confirm to me immediately who the hell Sisi Gestapo is.
One post, which had about two pages from about five different people in response. Person A “I don’t like the owners” half the forum “You aren’t a real fan/here’s a section of gifs that show how I feel about you/random insults”. But yeah totally normal proportional reaction.
You do realise there are certain posters who monitor this forum and only comment on the sisu/ricoh/wasps threads?
They never appear on any football related thread. That's what the reactions to.
Don't you find it strange that people log into a CCFC message board but have no interest in the team?
There's alot of interest in building schools in a 'modular' fashion, i'd say it makes perfect sense, especially of the long term plan isn't to stay at Ryton.A few observations.
A few posters have mentioned that the upgrades are being crained in/prefabbed/temporary as a negative.
A lot of permanent house in Scandinavian/German built this way-cheaper but doesn’t affect quality.
Generally referred to as modular https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modular_building
Also the spin that posters can’t see in the telegraph article is definitely there.
It’s clearly a two part article-or ‘shit we can’t have a positive story about owner investment without bolting in some shit at the end’.
The spin is after the end of quoting Robins and how he says that’s brilliant to get (slightly) better facilities.
The CET could have ended the article there but...
The CET goes on to highlight that SISU had applied for planning permission to build houses at Ryton, part of that permission is to find alternative training ground blah blah blah.
SISU have found alternative land but have not revealed where.
CET does this all the time. Even the reports on our success tinged with barbed criticism.
All for the free press but this very obviously biased.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
let's face if they're modular could be moved to a new site (if required)other than the boost it will give the players which at this time of the year which is a definite plus, it doesn't change much. But whats not to approve about it
It wont have cost that much, changes nothing in terms of club value or owners plans for the site, but the boost it gives the players can only help. Nicely timed, could possibly be paid for out of the interest on McCallums transfer fee. all good
Can't be having this.other than the boost it will give the players which at this time of the year which is a definite plus, it doesn't change much. But whats not to approve about it
It wont have cost that much, changes nothing in terms of club value or owners plans for the site, but the boost it gives the players can only help. Nicely timed, could possibly be paid for out of the interest on McCallums transfer fee. all good
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?