Transfer embargo (1 Viewer)

S

skybluesam66

Well-Known Member

• Aug 23, 2011

• #1

According to Kev Monks - may still be in place

This is exactly what I heard a few weeks ago - and have posted the same previously - not sure how we got round it with the new contracts, and what the rules are there

However, this time Kev I fear is right

 

kg82

Well-Known Member

• Aug 23, 2011

• #2

You can't sign anyone, including free transfers, under a transfer embargo.

 

rob9872

Well-Known Member

• Aug 23, 2011

• #3

Is it time to revisit my Umbongo connection? Can't remember if it was on here CET. Actually on reflection it should probably stay in the archives

 

spwaverley4916

Active Member

• Aug 23, 2011

• #4

Respect to Kev Monks - but all this MP type phrases - 'may still', 'might be', could be etc - if your mum had balls she would be your dad !!!!. We need facts, facts and more facts.
:blue:

 

coundonskyblue

New Member

• Aug 23, 2011

• #5

rob9872 said:

Is it time to revisit my Umbongo connection? Can't remember if it was on here CET. Actually on reflection it should probably stay in the archives

Click to expand...

You mean this one? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0ujh-UTdv8

I think Ken is on there somewhere.

 

oldskyblue58

CCFC Finance Director

• Aug 23, 2011

• #6

Kev Monks' article is based on a fans ramblings sbs66. The fans blog is full of misinformation and errors. Starts with a "source close to the club" then gets worse. Apparently the Bank have lent the club the money (there is no bank) and SISU (who manage others not invest their own funds) cant put more money in because they made a loss - they havent put a penny in !! ever. All sorts of other stuff that is frankly misleading and lacking in understanding. Like it says rumours ..... all dressed up to look authentic. Not losing sleep of that article

 

Bertola

Well-Known Member

• Aug 23, 2011

• #7

The signing of Goalkeepers can happen under an embargo if you get special dispensation, but Players can't sign (or be offered) new Contracts. Seeing as all the players in their final year have been offered new contractsand Clarke, Cameron, Bell and McPake have already signed there it shows we cant still be under the same embargo.

Possibly under a new one since they signed their deals, but not the same one as before

 

O

oggys nose

New Member

• Aug 23, 2011

• #8

If we were under the embargo why would we have bid for Lefonde on friday? and why would Thorn say on cwr that he was looking at bringing 1 or 2 in ?? I dont believe a thing Kev Monks says remember he put on his website that he sources had told him Shaun Wright-philips was coming on loan a few years back??

 

skybluegod

Well-Known Member

• Aug 23, 2011

• #9

i know nobody trusts KD but he said that we defenitly weren't under an embargo and even if we were it wouldn't matter we have no money lol:blue: PUSB