Think they are talking about 2.5 mil, reading are in a strange position because they aren’t allowed to sign anyone to replace him.
Here you go Waggers or WalkerThey can still sign players - only free agents or loans though.
And can apparently only offer one year contracts which doesn't bode well either.
If we sell hamer we should go for Joao he would do some damage with gyo playing two up topThink they are talking about 2.5 mil, reading are in a strange position because they aren’t allowed to sign anyone to replace him.
If we sell hamer we should go for Joao he would do some damage with gyo playing two up top
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
I think they are trying to get a defender in , after last week it might be slightly delayed but still hoping to get somebody in , the striker as mentioned before will depend on possible movements of current strikers@better days @Skybluebeliever expecting any incomings this week, any more info?
To what extent are their plans being hampered by not knowing how many of the big 3 will leave ? Clearly we don’t want to be buying cheap and cheerful if Robins then sells 2 and has a few million to reinvest …I think they are trying to get a defender in , after last week it might be slightly delayed but still hoping to get somebody in , the striker as mentioned before will depend on possible movements of current strikers
Think MR wants to try and get as many of the squad on the plane for Spain
Bidwell seemed to lack pace and dynamism when going forward at LB maybe but at LWB those attributes are very important.On the LWB front, many of us as fans see a massive hole there, however based on SBB comments it isn’t one of the three key positions MR wants to fill.
For various reasons we didn’t see too much of him, but officially we signed a proven LWB in January. I wonder if the above just confirms MR sees Bidwell as the answer, therefore why would we waste limited resource when we already have a first team LWB.
He didn’t look a LWB to me, especially not one for our system. But maybe after a proper pre-season he’ll look a different player.
Bidwell seemed to lack pace and dynamism when going forward at LB maybe but at LWB those attributes are very important.
During his time as Swansea did they play with 5 at the back or a back 4?
Bidwell seemed to lack pace and dynamism when going forward at LB maybe but at LWB those attributes are very important.
During his time as Swansea did they play with 5 at the back or a back 4?
Better days is silent ,no incomings then.
Better days is silent ,no incomings then.
We've got a proven lwb in Bidwell, it's not an issue at allOn the LWB front, many of us as fans see a massive hole there, however based on SBB comments it isn’t one of the three key positions MR wants to fill.
For various reasons we didn’t see too much of him, but officially we signed a proven LWB in January. I wonder if the above just confirms MR sees Bidwell as the answer, therefore why would we waste limited resource when we already have a first team LWB.
He didn’t look a LWB to me, especially not one for our system. But maybe after a proper pre-season he’ll look a different player.
He played lwb and set up their goal at St Andrews the season before last, he's not as explosive as Maatsen but his crossing is far superiorBidwell seemed to lack pace and dynamism when going forward at LB maybe but at LWB those attributes are very important.
During his time as Swansea did they play with 5 at the back or a back 4?
Robins said would be done over few days, that was last week, so assuming would sign this weekI know we missed out on the lad from Man City but what happened to the other one that was about to drop
Robins said would be done over few days, that was last week, so assuming would sign this week
He meant Todd Kane. Having him back in the squad will be like a new signing
?????? Have I missed something. I thought Kane was persona non grata, or some such, and was being edged towards the exit door.
Skybluebeliever suggested he may be welcomed back into the fold yesterday, and expects him to travel to Spain
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?