San Francisco
Well-Known Member
It's like the attitude some have towards Wilson. They still regard him as a League One keeper at best.
Dont waste your time mate , he's typical of some of our fanbase . Once they make a decision about players they won't change their minds
We've played 2 of the best teams in the division so far and in both Eccles was very close to man of the match .It's like the attitude some have towards Wilson. They still regard him as a League One keeper at best.
Not sure about your comments about Palmer but I think you’re spot on about Eccles.We've played 2 of the best teams in the division so far and in both Eccles was very close to man of the match .
For me the new midfield signing would replace Palmer on current form as he leaves us very exposed by not tracking back as much as he should
Wasn't a criticism of his form ,more of his positional play . He's often the furthest player forward and when we lose possession it leaves a huge gap between attack and midfield at times.Not sure about your comments about Palmer but I think you’re spot on about Eccles.
There’s a lot of squad players needed, as playing the high press requires a lot of energy and a lot more substitutions than past seasons.Eccles is a squad player. The only reason he's starting is that we've sold Hamer and not yet replaced him. Once that happens Eccles will be back to the bench.
And as for Allen...It's like the attitude some have towards Wilson. They still regard him as a League One keeper at best.
Yes, but he wasn't first choice in any position was he? He got starts when the likes of Palmer, Hamer, Sheaf, BNC, Dabo etc were injured/out. So he was a squad player, filling in when needed.He's been a regular in the team since about October last year.
Now you've just devolved into insulting me.Thank God for the ignore function.
We will be worse in midfield due to Hamer’s absence…which is not same as Eccles not being good enough.Now you've just devolved into insulting me.
The bottom line is Eccles simply doesn't have the technical abilities - range of passing, vision, close control that Gus used to completely orchestrate our play in possession last season. We will be a worse team overall with him playing in that position.
Gus was a 15 million player we haven't had too many of them down through the yearsNow you've just devolved into insulting me.
The bottom line is Eccles simply doesn't have the technical abilities - range of passing, vision, close control that Gus used to completely orchestrate our play in possession last season. We will be a worse team overall with him playing in that position.
He was a ~1.5m player when we bought him. Which is what we must do again, although this time we could spend 5-10m.Gus was a 15 million player we haven't had too many of them down through the years
Sent from my SM-A528B using Tapatalk
Exactly!Hamer definitely needs to be replaced, doesn't mean that Eccles is a bad player at all, he's just not Hamer... I happen to think Eccles has it in him to play as an 8 he has the attributes. However any CM we bring in would have to be an improvement on what we have which would mean someone becoming second fiddle which probably would be Eccles you would have to think.
Oh shut up you clueless fuckNow you've just devolved into insulting me.
The bottom line is Eccles simply doesn't have the technical abilities - range of passing, vision, close control that Gus used to completely orchestrate our play in possession last season. We will be a worse team overall with him playing in that position.
Your overreacting. He isn't saying anything bad.Thank God for the ignore function.
He isn't saying a lot of good either ?Your overreacting. He isn't saying anything bad.
No one in their right mind would argue we don't need to replace Hamer and that Eccles isn't as good as Hamer. Hamer is the best player we have had outside the Premier League. But that doesn't mean Eccles isn't good enough or a talented Championship player. And it doesn't necessarily mean he will drop out of the side.Exactly!
I've never said that Eccles is a bad player, just that we need to replace Hamer and that will naturally lead to Eccles dropping back to being a bench/squad player for the most part.
Apparently that's sacrilege round here...
No one in their right mind would argue we don't need to replace Hamer and that Eccles isn't as good as Hamer. Hamer is the best player we have had outside the Premier League. But that doesn't mean Eccles isn't good enough or a talented Championship player. And it doesn't necessarily mean he will drop out of the side.Exactly!
I've never said that Eccles is a bad player, just that we need to replace Hamer and that will naturally lead to Eccles dropping back to being a bench/squad player for the most part.
Apparently that's sacrilege round here...
But your being just as bad if anyone isn't as positive as you about a player.He isn't saying a lot of good either ?
He insists Eccles isn't a first team player despite his form last season and his brilliant start to this one as well .
No one has suggested Eccles is Gus or can replace Gus but hes obsessed with that line of reasoning
I'm 51 and can happily debate with other fans of this club and others but fans who've already made their minds up about players bore me . You say overreacting I say not interested in wasting time that that type of "fan"
One of them said Palmer drops lol. No more attacking mid.Those saying both we need to replace Hamer and Eccles is a first team player: who drops out of the XI for him?
Come on he's saying he isn't technical enough despite playing two roles more than adequately among others slights on his abilityBut your being just as bad if anyone isn't as positive as you about a player.
He is saying we need a hamer replacement and that if we get one it will probably be eccles who drops out of the first 11
That's probably true isn't it? If your honest?
Eccles is a good player and playing superb this season but doesn't mean he has same skillset as Gus. And sheaf prob would get in first 11 ahead of him still I imagine.
He might be being too down on Eccles perhaps but I think he acknowledges that he is a good player . I think he is a squad player myself and too early to say he's a bonafide starter.
Still some who haven't learned why you need a squad in this division as opposed to a strong starting XIThose saying both we need to replace Hamer and Eccles is a first team player: who drops out of the XI for him?
I said I would replace Palmer with the new midfielder if he was an attacking midfielderOne of them said Palmer drops lol. No more attacking mid.
By tehcnical he probably means the though balls and long balls. Something we haven't seen form Eccles. He might be capable of it but we ain't seen it yet.Come on he's saying he isn't technical enough despite playing two roles more than adequately among others slights on his ability
I agree he isn't Gus or ever likely will be but he's a damn fine championship midfielder
Cos you "hate" Palmer but having a go at those that "hate" Eccles.I said I would replace Palmer with the new midfielder if he was an attacking midfielder
Sorry I forgot the lol
Still some who haven't learned why you need a squad in this division as opposed to a strong starting XI
Show me one post where I've hated on Palmer ?Cos you hate Palmer but having a go at those that hate Eccles.
Great "fan"?
read the post again I've added ironic quote marks.Show me one post where I've hated on Palmer ?
Jeez there are some helmets on here today
On current form van Ewijk for starters.Those saying both we need to replace Hamer and Eccles is a first team player: who drops out of the XI for him?
I just mean he’s a squad player who can provide cover for Sheaf or at RWB.Sure sure. So he’s a squad player. Or who are you rotating him with? Sheaf? Hamers replacement? Or just filling in like he has been?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?