David O'Day
Well-Known Member
So we know you are a troll account. We now know you are an alt of someone who doesn't go to any games.
So we know you are a troll account. We now know you are an alt of someone who doesn't go to any games.No he didn't, out of possession he was alongside Sheaf/Eccles/Kelly whichever two were playing at the time.
2.5 up front, 20% sell on im told
Well in the bottom 2 you'd say he was playing as 1 of 2 10's in the box system.Here are the average positions from the last four games of the season - can you point out who the no 10 is in each of them?
View attachment 31723
View attachment 31724
View attachment 31725
View attachment 31726
Yea 18,000 posts alternate troll accountSo we know you are a troll account. We now know you are an alt of someone who doesn't go to any games.
David Icke will show back up soon!Not yet 6pm on deadline day and we’re getting deeper into the moon landing conspiracies, this is peak performance
Not yet 6pm on deadline day and we’re getting deeper into the moon landing conspiracies, this is peak performance
Bottom one fair enough, other three no.Well in the bottom 2 you'd say he was playing as 1 of 2 10's in the box system.
Thanks for help mate
This was brought up on talksport about a month ago re medicals. It is not just the problem of having a scanner and someone to work it. It is having the expert on hand to interpret the results and write the report for insurance purposes. It's not like looking at x-rays.Sound have invested some of the money we spent on Wright to buy a scanner for the physio room, might have gotten our first choices that way.
Ok, you'd know this if you watched us play but we sometimes play what is called a midfield box. This is where we play 2 deeper lying midfielders and then 2 more midfields just behind the striker. So while we are playing a system that has 2 "10's" it is entirely possible for a player to play as 1 of the 2 "10s" and still have another player slightly forward of him as that player will in fact be the other "10" in that system.Bottom one fair enough, other three no.
In the second to last one which you are erroneously trying to claim he's a 10, you can see squad number 8 (Jamie Allen) playing well ahead of Hamer as the main support for striker for Gyokeres.
Hamer is pretty much alongside number 14 (Ben Sheaf) in that match.
Lot's the loans i.e. like the Ambrabat to United deal are loans due to it not having FFP hit that a full transfer has.This was brought up on talksport about a month ago re medicals. It is not just the problem of having a scanner and someone to work it. It is having the expert on hand to interpret the results and write the report for insurance purposes. It's not like looking at x-rays.
Look at how many deals today and final day of window last season that are loans (even involving big clubs). Because a loan doesn't require the medical and negotiations are easier.
It's not slightly is it, Allen is well ahead of him that match and he's alongside Sheaf you thick mongrelOk, you'd know this if you watched us play but we sometimes play what is called a midfield box. This is where we play 2 deeper lying midfielders and then 2 more midfields just behind the striker. So while we are playing a system that has 2 "10's" it is entirely possible for a player to play as 1 of the 2 "10s" and still have another player slightly forward of him as that player will in fact be the other "10" in that system.
I know tickets are pretty pricey this year but you should try and get a game sooner or later.
Living room next
Well you’re either a troll or a total fucking idiot.Yea 18,000 posts alternate troll account
Divvy Dave has lost his head
In the final game of the season you can make the argument, but for the rest of the time he’s pretty much level with Sheaf/Eccles.Well in the bottom 2 you'd say he was playing as 1 of 2 10's in the box system.
Thanks for help mate
Swift would be a great signing
Both or maybe neither, I have went a bit over the top but genuinely not happy with the clubs transfer business since the Leicester match.Well you’re either a troll or a total fucking idiot.
Rather have one than 0
We have signed another midfielder since the Leicester game, add the fact that Latibeaudiere can and probably will move into DM when Kitching or Binks take the LCB role. We have two extra players in there.Both or maybe neither, I have went a bit over the top but genuinely not happy with the clubs transfer business since the Leicester match.
Happy to get Kitching over the line but think the club have dropped a clanger not getting a midfielder and another striker to compete with the three we have. Feel this was the time for the club to make a statement and establish itself as a genuine contender at this level but think we've fallen short.
Don't think this squad is better than a 9th - 12th place finish which is genuinely disappointing given last season and the early pre season excitement this season.
Who in midfield is going to score goals? It isn't as bad as some are making out, but we have lost Hamer. That is a pretty big hole in itself.
Ok, let me rephrase this question now the whole forum has descended into arguing over heat maps.
Who in the team other than the strikers is going to contribute a significant amount of goals? As I said previously, unless there is some significant improvement, we have overall a pretty goal shy team statistically.
We lost Gyokeres and Hamer - who carried the, ahem, burden, of scoring and assisting. 32 goals and 22 assists between them. Another ten goals came from a combination of Godden, Walker, Waghorn. Whilst we have got new strikers in which in theory should between them replicate the total strikers contributions from last season, everywhere else in the pitch is light as fuck (unless there is a major improvement). I fail to see how people cannot see this.
Oh come on. He plainly was. He was the one consistently linking up with Gyokeres, and hence why he chipped in with a few more goals than he previously was capable of getting.Oh and Hamer wasn't playing as a 10 regularly at the end of the season, that wasn't troll or being an idiot
£180k a week wages at Chelsea …. That’s why the fee is cheapCheaper than Kitching
Go and have a pint mateI must have imagined our best centre mid leaving then, you're kidding yourself
£180k a week wages at Chelsea …. That’s why the fee is cheap
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?