I don't think our need for an '8' is nearly as big as our need for a winger and a striker in this window. Since we've change to a 4 back we've been the 3rd best team in the league. The '8' were all after is the role that Cal and Kasey are playing. The fullbacks are still as attacking as they were in our 5 back system, meaning that we need a more defensively solid in the midfield (why Sheaf and Eccles are 4th and 6th in average rating for CMs this year). The most '8' midfield we have at the minute is Allen and he's looked a shadow of last season when playing in the new formation.
With the rumour swirling that Hadjis injury will have him out for a month our replacement is either Kasey or DaSilva on the left, afraid that isn't good enough for promotion. I don't think the right is as much of an issue as Cal or Milan can fill in on that side.
As for a striker, I think the sooner we replace Matty the better. He's been poor for the last 3 months and isn't a patch on Simms in the new system. He doesn't occupy defenders nearly as well as Simms does. Saying that I'm not sure Simmo is the answer up top in this system and Langstaff does offer something different to the both of them so could be the answer.
All regular starters for a playoff calibre team last season.Eccles, Allen and Sheaf
Scores very low in the, now common on here, "is he Japanese" metric.Anyway file this in the may or may not go through. Issues are the fee - as mentioned he only recently joined his current club which means they're being quite bullish about what they're asking. They'd also like him back on loan for the rest of the season which doesn't necessarily suit us. That bit is less of an issue though as either the fee will be right for him to come, or we decide to let him go back, but at least have secured the player before other clubs circle.
We'll see.
Jesus and I thought Saka was lightweight!
All regular starters for a playoff calibre team last season.
Why are you that bothered about whether you're thought of as the go-to rumour guy or not?
Palmer is never a wingerWhy on earth do we need a winger or at least one who expects to play 1st team? Wright on left (back up Palmer), Saka on right (back up Palmer).
We desperately need a number 8. After that it is a big striker as back up to Simms, absolutely not a fox in the box Godden/Taveres type. The 4-3-3 demands somebody to do a lot of physical grunt work running around creating space making it tough for the defence. I big burley loan would be ideal - Over 6 ft and built like a brick shithouse.
Maybe because Palmer isn’t a wingerWhy on earth do we need a winger or at least one who expects to play 1st team? Wright on left (back up Palmer), Saka on right (back up Palmer).
We desperately need a number 8. After that it is a big striker as back up to Simms, absolutely not a fox in the box Godden/Taveres type. The 4-3-3 demands somebody to do a lot of physical grunt work running around creating space making it tough for the defence. I big burley loan would be ideal - Over 6 ft and built like a brick shithouse.
Why are you that bothered about whether you're thought of as the go-to rumour guy or not?
..neither is Wright, but he is nowPalmer is never a winger
I believe you but it's obvious that the less he's featuring the more likely he was to go back earlyI'm bothered by the 'well its obvious with Ayari' responses, when i posted he was going in November
You said there was a possibility, and who really cares if you said that? It's all a bit needy to come on and say look at me, look wot I said.I'm bothered by the 'well its obvious with Ayari' responses, when i posted he was going in November
..neither is Wright, but he is now
We need a midfielder and one winger..neither is Wright, but he is now
You said there was a possibility, and who really cares if you said that? It's all a bit needy to come on and say look at me, look wot I said.
And the more you do that, the more people'll pull you up on the obvious / wrong / nonsense.
Fantastic. The crap of told you Ayari was going back, look at me is all a bit needy and lookatme.Sound il shutup now then
See the answer above. Wright is not a winger but is very effective as a left sided versatile attacker. Palmer could do that as a back up.
Wide forward ! We aren't playing with conventional wingers..neither is Wright, but he is now
Coy as ever, standard robinsCoventry City boss Mark Robins 'talking' to Doug King about transfer business
Coventry City transfer news from CoventryLive as Sky Blues boss Mark Robins says he has some "ideas, hopes and aspirations" for strengthening in Januarywww.coventrytelegraph.net
Hopefully we can come back to this sooner than the end of Jan!... In a positive manner of course!
Or Willock as he can play left or centralLove to get Ilias Chair in....would this be even feasible. Think je still has year and half left on his contract.
A struggling relegation doomed QPR would have to sell.
Fantastic. The crap of told you Ayari was going back, look at me is all a bit needy and lookatme.
I mean just post it and deal with it or don't, just stop being so fucki ng vain and thin-skinned.
Feel the same. He's been unbelievable at that level but the step up is substantial.Not sure about Langstaff, our recruitment has been really left field and data driven this season and it’s paid off. Signing a 26 year old cos he scored loads of goals in league 2 doesn’t seem to fit that model. It’s a big step up from league 2, see McNulty to Reading.
That's a good call too. But I'd like to keep our tradition of buying Morrocan. Besides I just think he's special player with x factor in a shite team.Or Willock as he can play left or central
Just bored of the look at me, told you so.Who pissed in your cereal? Bit harsh, innit.
It's a forum, he's just sharing information and insight. if you think its needy don't engage? Others may enjoy the posts.You said there was a possibility, and who really cares if you said that? It's all a bit needy to come on and say look at me, look wot I said.
And the more you do that, the more people'll pull you up on the obvious / wrong / nonsense.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?