CJ_covblaze
Well-Known Member
That surprises me if it’s true.
Somebody called Tim with a link to Jimmy hill way and a thing for cov ladies? Must be a few of them at the board meetings?
That surprises me if it’s true.
Do you think it makes the Trust look bad if that's a view and get the point I have been making that it destroys things you and others do that are positive?
As I said I’d be surprised if it was true. You mentioned something about the minutes of a meeting. Which one was it?
Good post OSB, and yes, of course Fisher has some influence.The power of final decisions may well lay with Sisu and Seppala in particular. But to think fisher has no influence in all this is I feel wrong. His role ever since he has been here has been to influence the perception of what is going on. He has been divisive, elusive, economic with the truth, provided carefully selected facts to suit a time or situation, clearly tried to control opinion. Why would anyone believe his role has changed? No he doesn't make the final decision but he very much sets the scene and protects his pay masters. He works with Sisu doesn't make decisions independent of them, is complicit.
Focussing on him however is not going to move things along. Remove him and someone else takes over to do the same. However it means more time lost when what we need is wasps and someone with the necessary authority from Sisu in the same room discussing a deal for next season as a minimum.
There are only two sides that really matter in this ..... everything else is just a diversion. Pressure must be applied to both those sides and no free rides by accepting either current position.
Surprised if what is true?
Yes, the board meeting minutes where a bloke called Tim who is / was involved with Cov United Ladies and linked to JHW was at.
Like I said, I am sure it would be swept aside that I have pointed out somebody involved calling Season Ticket holders nobs and all the rest of it and how it annoys me that you end up taking the flack for that sort of nonsense when you clearly don't share that opinion.
Just have a quick look through for a common pattern, who RT'd this (First one that showed up)? It's the same as the same sort of politic views, not really tried to hide it
He’s on our board so that doesn’t narrow it down what meeting he was at. For the record I can see where you’re coming from. I just want to know where you can point me to something somewhere that says a member of our board is running one or more of those accounts.
They are hardly going to say "I am on the Trust board" while posting it all across multiple accounts are they. Must just be a massive coincidence?
I wouldn't be pointing it out for you if it wasn't so obvious. Even the political views are consistent.
As I said, believe it if you want or ignore it. It's just the sort of crap you are having to defend when you try your best to interact.
They are hardly going to say "I am on the Trust board" while posting it all across multiple accounts are they. Must just be a massive coincidence?
I wouldn't be pointing it out for you if it wasn't so obvious. Even the political views are consistent.
As I said, believe it if you want or ignore it. It's just the sort of crap you are having to defend when you try your best to interact.
Might just be a huge coincidence that somebody else with the same name is a big fan of the ladies team and the trust / same politics and is so close to jhw.Don’t get me wrong I appreciate you passing it over. I will ask again though. Like I said it surprised me when you mentioned that thought Tim was involved. Tbh I find it a bit unfair to accuse someone of doing something without concrete evidence to back it up.
I see your alter ego is in the little Twitter circle with themThis place is getting more like Salem everyday.
I see your alter ego is in the little Twitter circle with them
He’s not really interacting at all
I see your alter ego is in the little Twitter circle with them
No it's just pathetic. Pricks who need multiple accounts to agree with themselves who have no interest in ccfc but like a bit of Cov United.Is online association a crime now?
Please note I'm in this little circle too.
Is online association a crime now?
Please note I'm in this little circle too.
Who are you on Twitter?
Ah...Council Jack Griffin of course
That surprises me if it’s true.
'LapdogLes'
'I Ain't No Boddy'
'FisherBaiter'
what a selection.
Still surprised? Must just be somebody with the same lack of photoshop skills with this other new account.
Like I said, they won't be able to help themselves and will end up making you look silly. Still think they aren't the same person?
What I’ve said to you in my PM still applies. As I’ve stated to you already it’s the last thing I need at present and I don’t understand why you’re still bothering me with it. I thought you said you wouldn’t and would go elsewhere.
I just added information into the thread where you made out I was wrong and won't have it.
Nobody seems to want to listen but are quite happy to tell me I'm wrong.
Don't you get it nobody is listening because they don't care.I just added information into the thread where you made out I was wrong and won't have it.
Nobody seems to want to listen but are quite happy to tell me I'm wrong.
Why wouldn't somebody else from the trust care? It's about bit strange isn't it?Don't you get it nobody is listening because they don't care.
Not sure how many people read that shit but without you promoting it on here it would be less.
Nobody cares that people on the trust's board/people that represent the "fans biggest supporters group", the same trust who promote "transparency and no hidden agendas on their website, people from said trust are pushing hidden agendas behind fake accounts nullifying any transparency?!?! I care!Don't you get it nobody is listening because they don't care.
Not sure how many people read that shit but without you promoting it on here it would be less.
It was when you were telling me I was wrong.You directly asked me about it. It’s nothing to do with me.
Why wouldn't somebody else from the trust care? It's about bit strange isn't it?
It seems it's you and others who don't seem to get it
I’ve done as much as I can. I’ve asked and been told it’s not who you’re saying it is. Without any cast iron evidence what more can I do. If you’re not happy with my response go to Moz or Bruce which is what I’ve told you before. As I said why are you bothering me with it given what I said before?
'LapdogLes'
'I Ain't No Boddy'
'FisherBaiter'
what a selection.
TBF they're an irrelevance, barely any followers and most of the retweets they get are from each other. Whoever is behind it must be a right sad bastard.
TBF they're an irrelevance, barely any followers and most of the retweets they get are from each other. Whoever is behind it must be a right sad bastard.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?