I think you are stuck with the wasps and sisu.The Trust is an embarrassment and is about as fit for purpose as Fisher is for CCFC.
There is so such hypocrisy and double standards in their statement surrounding London Wasps and SISU.
The sooner SISU, the franchise and the trust are out of the picture the better.
Coventry piratesIs there a league club in Cornwall? It could make excellent business sense in the long- run.
Never thought of that!The sooner SISU, the franchise and the trust are out of the picture the better.
The most damning assessment of modern football of them all, really!What the trust or supporters think doesn't matter we have seen that over the last 10 years.
The Trust is an embarrassment and is about as fit for purpose as Fisher is for CCFC.
There is so such hypocrisy and double standards in their statement surrounding London Wasps and SISU.
The sooner SISU, the franchise and the trust are out of the picture the better.
You'd think that this would be seen as common sense really wouldn't you ? Oh but no.....I personally think that fans would be reassured if we had a full board of directors, including some drawn from the local community, led by an active, full time chairman/CEO who was visibly in the local media being a cheerleader for the club, banging the drum on our behalf (like BR but more effective on the business side). I do understand that we'd need to ensure this didn't divert funds from the team, but if so then we'd see a team of directors, meeting weekly in Cov, hopefully being more open in terms of the club's plans. This would give fans confidence that we were not being run by a faceless London business entity, with the various people like JS and TF allocating a few hours a week to discuss CCFC matters via Skype. A little re-jig like this wouldn't cost much but could go a long way in making the management seem more local, more accessible and thus letting the fans feel a bit more ownership over the club.
Everyone has different views. The trust statement sums up my views but I am happy to accept that others disagree. I do ''tut' every time I see another unattributed statement on the CCFC site regarding the Ricoh row, but then I criticise others who sneer at the Trust at every opportunity. I have had enough of the whole saga now so had enough of slagging off other people for holding different opinions to me. As the Queen said the other day, time to start respecting the legitimacy of opposing views as a first step to agreement and reconciliation.You'd think that this would be seen as common sense really wouldn't you ? Oh but no.....
I once wrote a letter to Brian Richardson: I was a season ticket holder and once got to a game and found someone sitting in my seat. The stewards wouldn't move the idiot who refused to leave and instead they put me somewhere else.Everyone has different views. The trust statement sums up my views but I am happy to accept that others disagree. I do ''tut' every time I see another unattributed statement on the CCFC site regarding the Ricoh row, but then I criticise others who sneer at the Trust at every opportunity. I have had enough of the whole saga now so had enough of slagging off other people for holding different opinions to me. As the Queen said the other day, time to start respecting the legitimacy of opposing views as a first step to agreement and reconciliation.
I once wrote a letter to Brian Richardson: I was a season ticket holder and once got to a game and found someone sitting in my seat. The stewards wouldn't move the idiot who refused to leave and instead they put me somewhere else.
I complained and I got back a long letter of apology from Mr Richardson who enclosed 2 free tickets for guests to take for the next home game.
The thing is I wouldn't ever feel like sending a letter to Fisher because despite the endless threads on this site that seem to clarify Fisher's role I really don't think such a letter would reach him. I don't think any letter be it positive or negative would be dealt with by fisher. I don't really know what his position entails. I don't even know the address to send such a letter to. If it's the training ground at Ryton I doubt he knows where it is, though he may have been there with an RBC planning officer .
We need some local people on board, making decisions and being seen to be doing so to repair that void between club and community. It can't be all done by the likes of Boddy but I can't see Tim Fisher getting excited about it. Then again I don't understand whether Fisher and Boddy work together or not. I don't understand much. They don't tell us.
Well evidently, yes, as the subsequent backtracking (and lack of new ground) proves. But he did say it!Nonsense
CC4L is always right.Fuck em all
Don't encourage him.CC4L is always right.
As usual they continue their pathetic agenda
I would suggest that it is not local people we need but competent people. See Leicester City for details.I once wrote a letter to Brian Richardson: I was a season ticket holder and once got to a game and found someone sitting in my seat. The stewards wouldn't move the idiot who refused to leave and instead they put me somewhere else.
I complained and I got back a long letter of apology from Mr Richardson who enclosed 2 free tickets for guests to take for the next home game.
The thing is I wouldn't ever feel like sending a letter to Fisher because despite the endless threads on this site that seem to clarify Fisher's role I really don't think such a letter would reach him. I don't think any letter be it positive or negative would be dealt with by fisher. I don't really know what his position entails. I don't even know the address to send such a letter to. If it's the training ground at Ryton I doubt he knows where it is, though he may have been there with an RBC planning officer .
We need some local people on board, making decisions and being seen to be doing so to repair that void between club and community. It can't be all done by the likes of Boddy but I can't see Tim Fisher getting excited about it. Then again I don't understand whether Fisher and Boddy work together or not. I don't understand much. They don't tell us.
I once wrote a letter to Brian Richardson: I was a season ticket holder and once got to a game and found someone sitting in my seat. The stewards wouldn't move the idiot who refused to leave and instead they put me somewhere else.
I complained and I got back a long letter of apology from Mr Richardson who enclosed 2 free tickets for guests to take for the next home game.
The thing is I wouldn't ever feel like sending a letter to Fisher because despite the endless threads on this site that seem to clarify Fisher's role I really don't think such a letter would reach him. I don't think any letter be it positive or negative would be dealt with by fisher. I don't really know what his position entails. I don't even know the address to send such a letter to. If it's the training ground at Ryton I doubt he knows where it is, though he may have been there with an RBC planning officer .
We need some local people on board, making decisions and being seen to be doing so to repair that void between club and community. It can't be all done by the likes of Boddy but I can't see Tim Fisher getting excited about it. Then again I don't understand whether Fisher and Boddy work together or not. I don't understand much. They don't tell us.
If Fisher is really serious about ensuring CCFC's future at the Ricoh Arena in the long term, then his role as a Director of the companies pursuing litigation is key.
Under the "Confirmation Statement"
I care, he amongst many others have been at the heart of our demise.....why should that lying oxygen thief be taking any sort of place at the helm of our club. Fuck him off , he's surplus !
Yep, if we are to be kicked out we need the council to ensure we get to play at the Butts (Cov rugby permitting and onboard).
Can't see there are any other options. Ricoh, or last resort, the Butts.
At the risk of digression, we were quite happy to pay for a suitable pitch for Northampton...Aren't CRFC putting a plastic pitch in in the summer and the spec isn't acceptable to the EFL?
Aren't CRFC putting a plastic pitch in in the summer and the spec isn't acceptable to the EFL?
At the risk of digression, we were quite happy to pay for a suitable pitch for Northampton...
Guess that would depend if the commercial benefit of having CCFC there outweighed what they'd lose by not changing the pitch.True, but I'd imagine there's a good commercial reason behind why they've chosen the one they have.
I don't see them changing their plans to accommodate city
As LAST responded to me I take offence at the sly, moronic dig. Rather than ranting foolishly, I'd rather try and see a way forward. My personal agenda is to see the football club succeed (or at least exist!) without cutting off my nose to spite my face.
As LAST is being constructive, what stops you from being? Why reduce it to petty pathetic conspiracies?
You think it will change anything if he goes?
Got no time for the man but him going won't change anything.
True, but I'd imagine there's a good commercial reason behind why they've chosen the one they have.
I don't see them changing their plans to accommodate city
Aside from the fact that we wouldn’t have to look at his smug face or listen to his sycophantic tones again (worth getting rid of him for them reasons alone from a fans perspective) I think OSB has already pointed out on another thread that within his roles with Otium and SBS&L he legally has to sign of anything for the club including legal documents. If OSB is right (and he normally is) then he personally and his actions unquestionably link the club directly the legal proceedings. If he’s gone that link is removed. Might also be enough to break the stand off.
John Sharpe has already said that they won’t deal with the club on a ground share while Sisu are involved.
I think they'd just bring a patsy in to do his bidding.
Don't get me wrong, I couldn't care less if he goes just don't think it would change anything.
Undoubtedly they would. I think the point is though that Fisher must have signed off on the legal action being done in the clubs name if it’s legally required of him to do so as his roll. Any new patsy wouldn’t carry that connection so the clubs argument that they have no control over the legals would stand up more.
You may well be right about a signed contract , because SISU, would not sign it , and if they did, going by SISU past record they probably wouldn't honour it, leaving themselves open to a beach of contract and litigation .
So if you were the landlords, and going by SISU past record , i think they would have made it very clear during last year's agreement " drop the legals " and we will talk .
A variable agreement is binging in law , harder to prove I know, but all of the those meetings would have been minuted and both parties would have copies .
So may I suggest it's more than just soundbites .
Stop putting stuff in bold, it doesn't make your ramblings any more profoundYou may well be right about a signed contract , because SISU, would not sign it , and if they did, going by SISU past record they probably wouldn't honour it, leaving themselves open to a beach of contract and litigation .
So if you were the landlords, and going by SISU past record , i think they would have made it very clear during last year's agreement " drop the legals " and we will talk .
A variable agreement is binging in law , harder to prove I know, but all of the those meetings would have been minuted and both parties would have copies .
So may I suggest it's more than just soundbites .
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?