CJ_covblaze
Well-Known Member
Yes. In fact more than monthly.
Haven’t they been writing to ALL parties on a monthly basis for months now asking them all to get around the table and get this sorted?
It’s doesn’t. The responses on here may as well be from Fisher. It’s desperate stuff.
Nor do I.
Yes. In fact more than monthly.
Fisher going doesn't remove a link, the same as when igwe and orange Ken went. That's the thing and what's missed.
That's not saying he's an amazing chairman, he clearly isn't. Boddy has done much more in less time in terms of improving the club.
Now I'm confused even more.
Surely you can see the difference in approach?Yes. In fact more than monthly.
The legal action doesn't go with fisher, that's the thing.Onye and Ken didn’t authorise legal action in the clubs name did they?
The legal action doesn't go with fisher, that's the thing.
No I am not.He's just being contrary. That's his thing.
Then the next one..I never said it does. The signature that connects the club to the legal action does though.
You don’t need to follow a poster to actually view what he does do you?
Visit Rogers page on twitter OK and have a look at what he retweets and likes. It’s not difficult.
While you are at it perhaps you can also confirm Mr Ellis is indeed the same Mr Ellis in the attached article?
Your failures 'shattered lives': MP blasts ex-council chief’s committee evidence on Rochdale child sex ring | Mancunian Matters
No I am not.
There is a big difference to someone sitting on a stage making comments and giving answers then a person making a comment from the floor.
The accusation is, he was pulling the strings as he was a board member in theory he is a trust member with his own thoughts.
Yes. In fact more than monthly.
I know that but surely you don't check on everything everyone likes or tweets enough to be fully up to date with all their social media activities? Especially if you don't follow them. He was CEO of the council up there.
Surely you can see the difference in approach?
It took less than 1 minute.
Are you confirming this is the same roger Ellis then - yes?
Then the next one..
Wow I used to stand at the front all the time.He wasn't on the floor with everybody else. He was at the front addressing the crowd. Doesn't matter if it was on a raised stage or a level floor.
What do you mean it took less than 1 minute?
The same tone as everything against sisu / the club?The letters are pretty much the same. Names and the odd question is tailored to the recipient obviously but on the whole the content and the tone is the same.
Make up your mind. Shall we start getting into measurements of how raised it was?Wow I used to stand at the front all the time.
Spin it how you want Nick at these meeting lots of people stood up to put there points across
It took less than 1 minute.
Are you confirming this is the same roger Ellis then - yes?
Hopefully it won't, however if that's the case that it has him to sign do you think the next director will be somebody who won't?Next what? It’s been signed off. A new chairman won’t be signing it off again
He wasn't on the floor with everybody else. He was at the front addressing the crowd. Doesn't matter if it was on a raised stage or a level floor.
The same tone as everything against sisu / the club?
Yes, they had somebody taking a mic to people in the crowd alsoAnyone who shares an opinion at a trust meeting addresses the crowd. They even bring you a microphone on the few trust meetings I’ve been to specifically to do just that.
Hopefully it won't, however if that's the case that it has him to sign do you think the next director will be somebody who won't?
Can you find me an article about wasps in this tone?Yes. The letters have been asking questions rather than shouting at the relevant parties anyway.
Yes, they had somebody taking a mic to people in the crowd also
Encouraging the club to go into adminstration to be able to take over at the same time as being smug about going to away days only?So you’re issue with Dave then seems to be A) he could be arsed to turn up and B) shared an opinion. I don’t get what your issue is. Isn’t the Trust supposed to be a platform for fans? Why are you taking issue with it?
Funny how you constantly accuse others of being stalkers when your hobby is clearly stalking critics of SISU and Fisher. Is someone feeding you this information by chance or do you just make it your business to do their bidding for them. What a weird little man you are.
Hello Tony
Back off ignore again. It seems to me you are strangely desperate to defend trust members and suppress the truth and having a discussion.
Perhaps you’d like to explain why that is. It’s strange isn’t it. You did the same when one of the previous leaders twitter account was showing him to be a big advocate of Tommy Robinson. You’ve spent a lot of time on here lambasting Mr Robinson yet said you’d stand proudly on a march with someone who clearly believes in his politics.
Either you also are a fan of Mr Robinson or perhaps there are other reasons why you are desperate to divert any negative comments aimed at the trust
The majority - the vast majority - of members of the largest CCFC forum believe The trust is not fit for purpose
You are in the minority
Yes. The letters have been asking questions rather than shouting at the relevant parties anyway.
Fair play for this. I would say the recent public statements undermine whatever weight (admittedly not much!) those letters would have, however.The letters are pretty much the same. Names and the odd question is tailored to the recipient obviously but on the whole the content and the tone is the same.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?