They should be the voice of the majority if their members.
I don't think their members want them sitting on the fence.
I am happy to stand corrected if they do. However I think their members want them doing stuff to highlight our situation
I think their members want them asking the difficult questions of the relevant people and not letting go till they get the answers
Then their members can't whinge when the club tell them to fuck off then can they?
They do at the moment with the fence sitting approach
In a democratic society , like the trust , the majority line should be taken . It's a bit like a shop steward not listening to the people he represents . IF the members want this line of action , then the board of the trust should pursue it . IF they don't want this course of action then they shouldn't . Simple as that brothers
Then their members can't whinge when the club tell them to fuck off then can they?
I just want them to arrange this public forum ML wants and ask him those questions again. However really push him for the truth.
They can be impartial but still ask the awkward questions.
I think many want a definitive answer from ACL regarding the decision to reject the CVA so they can push them on that as well
Being impartial should be the same as a wet lettuce
That is easier said then done.
Sisu would not talk to the trust so they could not arrange anything.
We have also had open meeting that were arranged by the club What did they achieve???
If you are really bothered about the trust and what they do then come along to one of their meetings and have your say.
There are also places on the board if you think you can do better?
That is easier said then done.
Sisu would not talk to the trust so they could not arrange anything.
We have also had open meeting that were arranged by the club What did they achieve???
If you are really bothered about the trust and what they do then come along to one of their meetings and have your say.
There are also places on the board if you think you can do better?
I have a high regard for the trust
I just want you back doing what you were doing before representing the fans. Not been encouraged to sit on the fence.
Did you hear ML's interview Friday.
Those questions need asking again from the fans voice (the trust)
He has offered a public meeting are you intending to take him up on that and facilitate it?
A lot of fans are asking why ACL rejected the CVA.
Can you press them on that as well.
At the last meeting where ML attacked the trust what challenging questions did you ask him from that point?
Forgot its Sunday:facepalm:
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?