Tudgay/Fortune (2 Viewers)

SkyBlueRuffian · Jan 11, 2016

Both to be shown the door.

Otis · Jan 11, 2016

Does it say that? Is that from the CT article, cos they seem to be guessing that might be the case, rather than knowing any facts.

Steve.B50 · Jan 11, 2016

Fortune can go.
Would keep Tudgay, great professional and ideal to be on our bench.

Wyken Sky Blue · Jan 11, 2016

SkyBlueRuffian said:
Both to be shown the door.

I would want Mowbray to provide them a banjo and a cow. They have one chance each.

If they can't hit the cow's arse with said banjo they should leave.

Chipfat · Jan 11, 2016

skyblue1991 said:
I would want Mowbray to provide them a banjo and a cow. They have one chance each.

If they can't hit the cow's arse with said banjo they should leave.

Looks like we will be left with a cow and a banjo then!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

stevefloyd · Jan 11, 2016

wouldn't worry me at all if they both went...If we are to be successful then we need a threat on the bench not someone whos only threat is to the wage bill !!

shmmeee · Jan 11, 2016

Harsh on Tudgay. Has a reasonable scoring record for us and doesn't deserve to be lumped in with MAF.

Wyken Sky Blue · Jan 11, 2016

Chipfat said:
Looks like we will be left with a cow and a banjo then!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Certainly on MAF's go!

I don't want Tudgay to leave as I think he is a decent squad player. I've seen enough of MAF to decide he isn't good enough for us.

rupert_bear · Jan 11, 2016

If that's correct it suggests to me a striker is on his way in, no way would TM go into the second half of the season with just Adam Armstrong who if he signs on again could be subject to a 24hr call back.

Chipfat · Jan 11, 2016

I cant see both being let go at the same time, unless TM has players being signed as replacements, think we do need another option up top and maybe a target man is what he is looking at. MAF would be defo on my exit door list and depending on signing Tudgay would be very close to it if better can be found.

Grendel · Jan 11, 2016

shmmeee said:
Harsh on Tudgay. Has a reasonable scoring record for us and doesn't deserve to be lumped in with MAF.

He's scored 4 goals for us

stevefloyd · Jan 11, 2016

If we can sign a goalscorer it would take 'pressure' off Armstrong and be better overall for our promotion hopes..Tudgays done ok for us but for some reason not getting a game so he may as well go

Grendel · Jan 11, 2016

It makes me laugh when people say tudgay has done Ok and MAF has not. Tudgay's goal scoring contribution has been dire and his status has been elevated by not playing. Last season most people on here couldn't stand him.

SkyBlueRuffian · Jan 11, 2016

rupert_bear said:
If that's correct it suggests to me a striker is on his way in, no way would TM go into the second half of the season with just Adam Armstrong who if he signs on again could be subject to a 24hr call back.

2 in 2 out.

hill83 · Jan 11, 2016

Grendel said:
He's scored 4 goals for us

7

stevefloyd · Jan 11, 2016

To be fair I thought he was fucking dreadful when he 1st came although he did get better...... ish

stevefloyd · Jan 11, 2016

And lets face it if he was good enough he would be playing ...right

coop · Jan 11, 2016

I would be glad to see the back of MAF utter tripe when I've seen him play

oakey · Jan 11, 2016

We have to question whether we need players who are good bench fodder or unlucky not to get a game. Don't we want back up strikers who TM finds it hard to leave out? With the best will in the world neither are pushing for a starting place and in the run in we need more. I would expect one or both to make way for a genuine starting place option.

stevefloyd · Jan 11, 2016

But on his debut at the Ricoh he looked the real deal

Grendel · Jan 11, 2016

hill83 said:
7

Yes I read Wiki and saw 4 from 22. It's actually 7 from 37. Either way a goal ratio of 1 in 5.5 games isn't very good.

sw88 · Jan 11, 2016

Steve.B50 said:
Fortune can go.
Would keep Tudgay, great professional and ideal to be on our bench.

Whilst I agree about Tudgay (and FOrtune - hes easily our most disposable, or second to Connor Thomas but as hes injured he moves down a place....), hes sat on the bench for most of the season and not been used, so why would he want to stay and continue to do this when he could potentially leave and get atleast some football at another club? I like him, but cant see it working out for him here, not least while TM is manager anyway as he doesn't seem to rate him much, and id rather TM stay and Tudgay move on to pastures new!

ccfc1234 · Jan 11, 2016

Both are arguably surplus to requirements now with the way we play, and should be totally irrelevant to our needs for where I hope we will be next season. Both have horrible goals to games ratio's.

I would keep one of them until the end of the season, but if them both going frees up budget for a more progressive signing, I am all for it.

IrishSkyBlue · Jan 11, 2016

how much wages do ye think they would be taking up that tm could use?

Hobo · Jan 11, 2016

IrishSkyBlue said:
how much wages do ye think they would be taking up that tm could use?

Not that much, but combined? Now that might bring in a contender.

coop · Jan 11, 2016

We have a backup forward in Murphy when he played against Gillingham he was outstanding.

ccfc1234 · Jan 11, 2016

Tudgay and JOB

wrong thread.

shmmeee · Jan 11, 2016

Grendel said:
It makes me laugh when people say tudgay has done Ok and MAF has not. Tudgay's goal scoring contribution has been dire and his status has been elevated by not playing. Last season most people on here couldn't stand him.

3 in 4 starts (plus on at half time once and a bunch of cameo appearances) this season.

6 in 20 starts for us overall.

Thats not "dire".

shmmeee · Jan 11, 2016

*mobile edit:

Not sure you can judge any striker on Pressley's last season.

stoneroses85 · Jan 11, 2016

They both average 20 goals each over last 6 years in total TM will have a plannto replace no doubt
..... buzzing for tomorrow night

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk

Samo · Jan 11, 2016

stevefloyd said:
And lets face it if he was good enough he would be playing ...right

Wrong... If he was better than Arma he would be playing.

robbiethemole · Jan 11, 2016

Tudgay's goal at Burton was feckin good mind

Otis · Jan 11, 2016

IrishSkyBlue said:
how much wages do ye think they would be taking up that tm could use?

Well Fortune is probably costing us a ........

ccfcway · Jan 11, 2016

they need to make way for Samaras :thinking about:

Sky Blue Pete · Jan 11, 2016

Cant see Fortune going

Tudgay/Fortune (2 Viewers)

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Chief Commentator!

Well-Known Member

Facebook User

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

New Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency