I know, you must be meek as anything to think he was aggressive.Lol, fair play, really funny
Nothing of not predictable.I'm genuinely surprised it took you this long to get on this thread!
The obsession from some people with this unremarkable player is so strange.I find the whole Biamou thing bizarre from both sides. Today you’ve got Andy Turner asking whether we should have kept him after playing 55 minutes for Dundee United this season
walker ?The obsession from some people with this unremarkable player is so strange.
It's the Mackem cunts that have fucked him over, clearly.....went downhill after he joined the Massive club....Mcnulty has been superb since leaving us , to go on to bigger and better thingsView attachment 24828
The spreadsheet's out!Mmmm
21/22 Summer transfer mega-thread
We were rumoured to be looking at Lawrence Shankland. Seems to have a good record in the Scottish Prem. Might be out of our price range though. Possibly could do a job in the Championship, but a gamble, which I suppose is like any transfer. His scoring exploits have slowed right down now he’s...www.skybluestalk.co.uk
I know, you must be meek as anything to think he was aggressive.
The obsession from some people with this unremarkable player is so strange.
That was me!Gnanduillet
That doesn't explain why that made him Messi junior in the eyes of his cult tho does it?The obsession with Biamou was and is because he worked his socks off for the team and also clearly loved Cov and the fans, loyalty is hard to come by in the modern era
The obsession with Biamou was and is because he worked his socks off for the team and also clearly loved Cov and the fans, loyalty is hard to come by in the modern era
No but it explains why they were obsessedThat doesn't explain why that made him Messi junior in the eyes of his cult tho does it?
His effort or love for the club was never in question, nor was ever doubted. The split from fans stemmed from a certain section of the fanbase consistently coming out with rubbish regarding his actual footballing ability. And when questioned or disagreed with they'd throw their toys out the pram rather than actually listen to reason.
You've had fans thinking he was the best finisher at the club, incredible at link-up play, is a far better option than all of our strikers combined, is the ultimate target man or had the best touch at the club. The list goes on - I'm sure I've forgotten more zingers.
The narrative around his ability was and still is just utterly bizarre. He had none of the aforementioned traits yet fans would still to this day die on their sword and claim their fabricated views regarding his footballing ability were (and are) gospel.
I said at the time:Max Biamou played through injury that year he was our only 'fit' striker
His knee was so sore it hurt every time he had a shot
Of course he wasn't Championship level as a footballer - he came to us from Sutton Utd
But as a human being he's Premier League
I can't criticize Robins for not renewing Max's contractI said at the time:
Signing Waghorn and letting Biamou go was a strange decision:
It left us with only Gyok as a striker with any physicality, particularly after we also let Baka go.
Waghorn’s signing fee, agent fee(?) plus wages could have been better spent on Max PLUS a young prospect where there was at least a chance of them coming good and a resale profit. Waghorn was never going to be a player that could command a fee.
Max might well have not been up to Champ starting line up standard. But as a sub or League Cup player he was adequate. Plus, I’m guessing around the training ground he was a positive vibe player. I’ve no idea about Waghorn.
We ended up running Gyok into the ground.
That was a madness risk.
I was laughed at and given pelters at the time, but I still say, with surety, signing Waghorn and letting Max go was a strange decision.
It was the right decision to let Biamou go.
We are still building a championship quality squad (we have a championship quality first team now) and you don't do that by keeping players who are below the level around.
Don't know what you're readingCan’t believe what’s being said, Max wasn’t good enough, we are a football club looking to to move on and up not a charity
Did you say he wasn't good enough when he scored at Notts County in the play offs your not looking at what is being saidCan’t believe what’s being said, Max wasn’t good enough, we are a football club looking to to move on and up not a charity
Don't know what you're reading
That's what most people are saying
But there's a right way of doing things
I said at the time:
Signing Waghorn and letting Biamou go was a strange decision:
It left us with only Gyok as a striker with any physicality, particularly after we also let Baka go.
Waghorn’s signing fee, agent fee(?) plus wages could have been better spent on Max PLUS a young prospect where there was at least a chance of them coming good and a resale profit. Waghorn was never going to be a player that could command a fee.
Max might well have not been up to Champ starting line up standard. But as a sub or League Cup player he was adequate. Plus, I’m guessing around the training ground he was a positive vibe player. I’ve no idea about Waghorn.
We ended up running Gyok into the ground.
That was a madness risk.
I was laughed at and given pelters at the time, but I still say, with surety, signing Waghorn and letting Max go was a strange decision.
That’s certainly going back a few yearsDid you say he wasn't good enough when he scored at Notts County in the play offs your not looking at what is being said
That’s certainly going back a few years
And a couple of divisions.
ok kennyWe should have kept Jack grimmer for sealing the deal in that final
ok kenny
ok kenny
off track as alwaysok Max. I think Bedworth are looking for a new striker
Can’t see too many League 1 clubs being interested in him. Maybe Sutton will take him backok Max. I think Bedworth are looking for a new striker
Can’t see too many League 1 clubs being interested in him. Maybe Sutton will take him back
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?