Unbeaten in last 6 matches (1 Viewer)

Otis

Well-Known Member
David Bell out injured for last 6 matches.


:thinking about::thinking about::thinking about::thinking about::thinking about::thinking about::thinking about:


Go figure. :whistle:
 

Tonylinc

Well-Known Member
David Bell is a good player technically BUT is totally ineffective. He is, what I would call, a luxury player and we simply cannot afford such a player in our current position.
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
Didn't we same the same about Freddie Eastwood? Good player technically, but a let down on the pitch in game time.
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
At least he will be an option from the bench if say we wish to inject a bit of pace into the game.
 

Big Mo

New Member
Bell is one of those players who drives you mental by bottling every challenge he goes into and not working hard enough for the team

On a more positive note he does have the ability to deliver a better cross than anyone else in our squad and when he's actually fit (basically never) he can be a very effective player
 

standupforcity

Well-Known Member
Bell does have a very good understanding with Keogh....either way, it good to have him fit again with our depleted squad
 

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
We wouldn't have beaten Boro at home without him.
 

harvey098

Well-Known Member
I like bell to be honest. He's not the quickest but I don't think he's game needs him to be. He is a poor mans beckham... Well, I fucking broke mans Beckham.
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
Technically very good yes, not so sure about the 'honest' bit though. To me at times he is like a passenger who doesn't want to break sweat or even get his jersey dirty.

Not so sure about the broke man's Beckham either. More like the Brokeback Mountain's Beckham if anything.
 
Last edited:

Nonleagueherewecome

Well-Known Member
He's had a few very good games this season, generally as a sub, and they did come mostly just before he got injured. Yeah he's incredibly inconsistent in a squad of inconsistent players, but we need all the bench options we can get. And he does try-he's not physically strong, that isn't his game, but he is no way deserving of being tarred with the same brush as Eastwood.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Didn't we same the same about Freddie Eastwood? Good player technically, but a let down on the pitch in game time.

I think that's harse. There is no suggestion he doesn't work hard in training or not try hard enough. Has done ok in spells and will be missed. Had looked useful when used as a sub in a few games.
 

SkyBlue_Bear83

Well-Known Member
Bell's game consists of wandering aimlessly around the pitch mostly playing 2 yard passes sideways or backwards, throw in the occasional cross or shot and that is Bell's game in a nutshell.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top