I'm not in a frenzy, quite clearly. If I was I'd be frothy mouthed making things up and shouting maddison money over and over.
It was pointless and will only piss people off.
Ask at the scg
Good post.
Or before we start releasing ridiculous statements.It is. But let's see who we sign because of the RV sale before we start slapping each other on the back.
Or before we start releasing ridiculous statements.
Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk
As they are releasing statements criticising his management of the club.Why should they be calling for TM to be sacked?
It's ridiculous in that it's overly dramatic in response to us selling an average league one player, before they've even given a chance for a replacement to be signed. Yes, it is that ridiculous.Is it really that ridiculous? A supporters trust asking for decisions at the club that it's members support to be explained? Isn't that sort of the point of having a supporters trust?
It is ridiculous because as you say we need to see what TM does with the money before we decide if it's a good decision or not.Is it really that ridiculous? A supporters trust asking for decisions at the club that it's members support to be explained? Isn't that sort of the point of having a supporters trust?
As they are releasing statements criticising his management of the club.
It is ridiculous because as you say we need to see what TM does with the money before we decide if it's a good decision or not.
Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk
Exactly, and that's what the poster said. Wait and see. Unlike you and the trust buffoons with your conspiracy theories and conjecture.It is. But let's see who we sign because of the RV sale before we start slapping each other on the back.
It's ridiculous in that it's overly dramatic in response to us selling an average league one player, before they've even given a chance for a replacement to be signed. Yes, it is that ridiculous.
and we've signed Gadzhev and mcann? Or do only negatives count?It also about the loss of Fleck. Together they were the backbone of our midfield last season if not the team. We certainly played better when they had a good game. It's a reaction to more than just RV.
Exactly, and that's what the poster said. Wait and see. Unlike you and the trust buffoons with your conspiracy theories and conjecture.
They haven't said if it's a good decision or not in the statement. They've asked for it to be explained. Not nearly the same thing.
"On behalf of our members and all CCFC supporters, the Sky Blue Trust would like to know how the loss of another of our key midfield players will help the football club to realise its ambition to secure promotion."
It's a pretty loaded question. It sounds like something my mrs would say after my attempt at doing the dishes.
Ha ha, I meant the tone.If she's asking you about Vincelot and promotion after you've done the dishes, something has gone seriously awry in the Hill household.
and we've signed Gadzhev and mcann? Or do only negatives count?
its already been explained by TM you numpty
True, but then also signed last season was Rose. Therefore in he, McCann and Vlad we'd already signed 3 central midfielders. So it isn't like a position of having nobody, we'd got a ready made replacement.We already had Gadzhev and Mcann is only here to Xmas. So neither have been signed of the back of selling RV. That isn't a positive or a negative, just a fact.
True, but then also signed last season was Rose. Therefore in he, McCann and Vlad we'd already signed 3 central midfielders.
True, but then also signed last season was Rose. Therefore in he, McCann and Vlad we'd already signed 3 central midfielders. So it isn't like a position of having nobody, we'd got a ready made replacement.
The Trust statement is knee jerk and in some respects counter to other statements they've made.
Are the Trust now not keen on the idea of academy players? Is the thought of Ben Stevenson playing in midfield really that hard to stomach?
He said it was. But I guess he would also say that Sisu are great owners. Take my point ?I am unhappy with the Vincelot sale but I don't think it requires a Trust statement. Managers decision wasn't it?
I don't think that they've said that the thought of Ben Stevenson playing in midfield is hard to stomach.
If the reply to the trusts question is that with Ben Stevenson coming up we believe he can fill the position and it will release funds to other area's of the team and the trust replies that that is hard to stomach you'll have a point. But as that isn't what has happened.
The trust has asked a pretty straight question. You seem to be making knee jerk assumptions into what the trust has asked.
We already had Gadzhev and Mcann is only here to Xmas. So neither have been signed of the back of selling RV. That isn't a positive or a negative, just a fact.
No it hasn't
“I have to ask the fans to trust what we are trying to do and sometimes you have to sell an asset so you can build. I’m trying to create an infrastructure at the club. Hopefully there will be new heroes for the supporters as I build a team in the image I want to see.”
He's asked us to trust him, mentioned infrastructure but not said what that is and said he's hopeful.
Don't get me wrong. I'm a fan of TM and was one of the main players in defending him last season on here when others were calling for him to be sacked. But that isn't an explanation.
We've sold him as another club offered him a better deal than we had under contract.
What this statement doesn't actually take into account is how that's dealt with. Mowbray sold him for that reason and that reason alone.
So it's a stupid statement on that basis alone.
It also drones on about negative comments from members yet a lot on here seem very accepting of it.
So what does this achieve exactly? On the one hand we want information from Anderson about some matters of genuine concern but the leading fans body results to a puerile and childish dig which will annoy Anderson and Mowbray and hardly make either of them improve their openness.
its pretty clear hes gonna use the money to bring in different/better players who perhaps he needs to pay a fee for to get them in. Or perhaps the money goes towards signing on fees or just to icnrease wage budget.
as fans we dont really deserve an explanation unless its not being used on the team. we cannot demand to know how and when it is used by the actual manager though
So you're saying TM sold him so he can have a pay rise? That was nice of him.
The trust statement is barely four sentences. It doesn't drone on about anything. It gives two sentences to layout the feelings of it's members and a question made up of a further two sentences.
You say accepting of it but what you actually mean is open minded currently about it. You don't know what the end result is yet. How can that be accepting? What if RV's sale has happened so we can sign your favourite player Bigi? Will you be accepting of it? Or will you be wishing it was questioned sooner?
So Tony if a company offered to double your salary would you be de motivated if forced to stay?
Mowbray says he sat the player down and agreed it was in the best interests of the club that the player left.
Do you believe the manager or do you think - as the trust clearly does - he is just another sisu puppet.
When did the membership of the SBT get asked for their views on this?layout the feelings of it's members
When did the membership of the SBT get asked for their views on this?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?