Crikey. Talk about a selective question from a very small carefully selected quote of a detailed reply.
So you agree that they haven't criticised TM's management? You're certainly aren't disagreeing given the tiny tiny part of my reply you've picked out.
You certainly are avoiding answering Daves point.
I'll answer his when he's answered mine.
Talking of avoiding questions I've asked you twice now this evening and you still haven't answered. If it turns out that we sold RV to make way for signing Bigi will you be acceptable of it?
He asked you the first question and you avoided it like the plague but hey ho.
Of course I wouldn't want him as a replacement but given he would be on more money than vincelot it would be a management choice so irrelevant to the budget. So it's something the trust should never comment on unless you are saying they should know wages every player receives.
Even OSB acknowledges this statement is inflammatory and stupid. Don't you agree with him on this?
I can't be arsed to read 4 pages of drivel, why do you think this statement is necessary?The trust never said anything in the slightest about wages so why you're trying to make out they did god only knows.
OSB actually said unwarranted and ill advised so again you're making out someone has said something different to what they actually said.
I don't have to agree with everything that OSB says just as I don't have to disagree with everything that you say.
Although OSB did ask a very similar question earlier today on a different thread to the trust statement.
I can't be arsed to read 4 pages of drivel, why do you think this statement is necessary?
I'd say it's a question that Mogga has answered.I don't think it's totally necessary but it is a relevant question and it is a question that a lot of fans are asking on a subject that most fans are talking about. Just see this forum for proof of that.
Personally I think this is the biggest call TM has made since he's been at the club and I don't see the issue with that call being questioned, by whoever. If a supporters trust isn't going to ask the important and difficult questions then what is it for?
I trust TM personally but I don't think he's beyond questioning. Some people have (wrongly IMO) taken this question as criticism and are trying to put slants on it that simply aren't in the statement. Suggesting that the trust have an issue with youth being brought through, the trust have an issue with not knowing wages, if the trust believe that (don't think that they've stated that they believe anything, it's a question) why don't they call for TM to resign just to name a few.
It's a lot of fuss over nothing.
No I don't agree. I think it is critical in tone, I don't see how it can be interpreted any other way. And as Mowbray is making the decisions it is therefore critical of Mowbray and his management.Crikey. Talk about a selective question from a very small carefully selected quote of a detailed reply.
So you agree that they haven't criticised TM's management? You're certainly aren't disagreeing given the tiny tiny part of my reply you've picked out.
I'd say it's a question that Mogga has answered.
Vincelot was obviously part of TMs plans until the Bradford offer came in.
No I don't agree. I think it is critical in tone, I don't see how it can be interpreted any other way. And as Mowbray is making the decisions it is therefore critical of Mowbray and his management.
Haven't bradford said it wasn't a quick deal and they had been trying a while?
I am really struggling to get my head around what is happening.
Last season TM had said that 60% of all income.....including money received by selling players......would be used on our playing side including wages. I mentioned it a few times on here. I was questioned about whether I thought I was right to believe it. After the sale of Maddison I said I was unsure.
So now we have heard from TM that he won't see any of the Maddison cash but will get it from now. And those that questioned what was said about TM previously getting 60% of all income are now saying trust TM and SISU to spend the money strengthening our squad. So what is different from last season to now?
Not what I am saying.Ah, the shifting parameters of management. It is after all about; manage.
Tony getting smashed all over this thread like he did on that Wasps one. Chuck the towel in Tony, there's a good lad.
Just what I was thinking lolI don't agree, he's hitting nearly all the opposition to the boundary on this. They might not agree with his point, so make shit up while he's kept a straight bat. Nicks frenzy went for a six. :-;
Frenzy? Of course.I don't agree, he's hitting nearly all the opposition to the boundary on this. They might not agree with his point, so make shit up while he's kept a straight bat. Nicks frenzy went for a six. :-;
Lots of knee jerk wailing and gnashing of teeth on here upon the news.Sky Blue Trust - Statement On The Sale Of Romain Vincelot
"Following the loss of John Fleck, at the end of his contract to another League 1 club, the sale of Romain Vincelot also to one of our rivals has seen responses from many Coventry City fans ranging from bewilderment and disappointment to anger and dismay.
On behalf of our members and all CCFC supporters, the Sky Blue Trust would like to know how the loss of another of our key midfield players will help the football club to realise its ambition to secure promotion."
http://www.skybluetrust.co.uk/index.php/114-latest-news/513-statement-on-the-sale-of-romain-vincelot
Frenzy? Of course.
So why not ask at the scg meeting they are going to in a day or so? It was for the attention.
It isn't made up, it's common sense.
I notice he didn't have a go at osb's post.
Perhaps you didn't pick up on my subtle joke around the word manage, as in get by rather than exert control.Not what I am saying.
Last season those saying that I was wrong to trust SISU/TM to have 60% of all income including player sales on the playing squad (and they were right) are now saying trust the sale of RV to help the building of this seasons squad.
So did I.. Yet you jumped straight on it..Probably because OSB just stated his opinion with none of the added frenzy.
I don't agree, he's hitting nearly all the opposition to the boundary on this. They might not agree with his point, so make shit up while he's kept a straight bat. Nicks frenzy went for a six. :-;
Bit embarrassing really.Whammy!
Whammy!
Unlike you and the trust buffoons with your conspiracy theories and conjecture.
So did I.. Yet you jumped straight on it..
Why aren't you lecturing him about what a supporters trust should do?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?