In your opinion. Not the opinion of 1.5 million people.
You haven’t actually answered my point. I will answer yours but I need to understand your perspective first. Do you agree with suppression of freedom of speech or not?
Very valid point. Anyone who wants to read the Mail on Virgin Trains would be able to via the app.How many people read it as opposed to an app on their phone on the train nowadays anyway?
Fixed.Very valid point. Anyone who wants to read the puritanical Mail on Virgin Trains would be able to see the endless display of cleavge shots and wardrobe malfunctions on the online edition via the app.
Close thread.
Yup.I read the Daily Mail, I like a laugh now and again after all, and you never know when you need some toilet paper.
Anyway, I'd agree that it would be censorship if it were banned but... if it's just not sold because no bugger buys it, then who's spinning what headline?
Given it's internet only nowadays, you'd be kind of likely for that to happen...I used to like the Independent, but if I went on a train that said they didn't sell it I wouldn't have any problem with that at all.
Is it really!!Given it's internet only nowadays, you'd be kind of likely for that to happen...
Old righty Branson banning the Guardian?!?Just reading up and they only distributed four papers anyway and will now only be distributing the Mirror, Times and FT from now on. Hardly a newsagent by any stretch of the imagination.
I read the Daily Mail, I like a laugh now and again after all, and you never know when you need some toilet paper.
Anyway, I'd agree that it would be censorship if it were banned but... if it's just not sold because no bugger buys it, then who's spinning what headline?
well it clearly doesn't. It has a responsibility to report truthfully and often fails in that duty.
It may have 1.5 million readers bt you can guarantee that everyone who posts on the CET comments section is among them!
We'll both be stony faced if we're on a Virgin Train then.In the same way I read the Guardian and snigger when the odious Will Love My Self is viewed as a voice of reason.
Just one copy sold per four trains."We've decided that this paper is not compatible with the VT brand and our beliefs"
Yawn. Just another pathetic little hissyfit from an organisation who won't accept Brexit.
"We've decided that this paper is not compatible with the VT brand and our beliefs"
Yawn. Just another pathetic little hissyfit from an organisation who won't accept Brexit.
In the same way I read the Guardian and snigger when the odious Will Love My Self is viewed as a voice of reason.
Just one copy sold per four trains.
Seems like some can't accept that simple fact.
If it were me I would be seeking that one person out and asking 'WHY???'
Guessing the answer might well be they were in a rush and picked up the Daily Mail in error.
so why are they still selling the pro Brexit Telegraph?
so why are they still selling the pro Brexit Telegraph?
Old righty Branson banning the Guardian?!?
Because all true lefties MUST hate the Mail. The Guardian says so.
Because they didn’t expose Branson as a sexual predator.
Grendull do public transport? He wouldn’t wipe his arse on a rail season ticketWe'll both be stony faced if we're on a Virgin Train then.
Because all true lefties MUST hate the Mail. The Guardian says so.
racist, manipulative, spiteful and jumped up little pricks that are of limited intelligence and wouldn't know what hypocrisy was if it smacked them with a hijab
No we just hate racist, manipulative, spiteful and jumped up little pricks that are of limited intelligence and wouldn't know what hypocrisy was if it smacked them with a hijab... so pretty much it's online comments section.
There's always first class to keep the plebs out.Grendull do public transport? He wouldn’t wipe his arse on a rail season ticket
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?