bigfatronssba
Well-Known Member
So let me get this straight, your in favour of public money being used to build a stadium and then given away, but its illegal for public money to be used in securing a public asset?
Oh yes, in the council corridors there are many to blame. The judicial review will be coming.
He means the football club as recognised by the only body that matters - the football league.
Oh yes, in the council corridors there are many to blame. The judicial review will be coming.
If i'm Tim Fisher, which 'SISU operative' are you? Or are we Tim using different accounts?
Today's news is both shocking and disappointing.
ACL have today shown their true colours; After reading that one of the conditions of CVA was that SISU retract their high-court action against the council, one cannot escape the impression that ACL really speaking are being controlled by the council who have their own agenda. From a business perspective, ACL have committed suicide today, and the only explanation is that another entity is pulling the strings.
The truths in the matter show how blinded some of us have been become as a result of our impatience with SISU over the last few years and our susceptibility to the propaganda vomited into the public domain by the council/CET etc. If this were any organisation other than SISU (or a SISU owned enterprise), people would very clearly see the wood for the trees.
ACL have claimed to want to put an end to this matter.
They claim to want to resolve all issues and return CCFC to Coventry.
They claim to have put a wonderful offer on the table.
Yet;
They are being bullish and threatening another football club with legal action for their involvement in helping us complete our fixtures.
They make CVA (which is in the best interests of the club) conditional on us accepting their offer and revoking high-court action.
They have refused CVA which is going to hugely affect us with our new campaign which at the very least has cost us points and crucial time to manoeuvre in the transfer market.
They are clearly trying to cause damage to the club, and you must consider if they are doing it off their own back, or on the instruction of a third party (CCC). Goodwill has to exist in business, and a no-strings CVA agreement would have been a positive step in putting all this manure behind us, and they would have recovered a considerable sum of the money owed. To insist that CCFC must retract high-court action is clearly not an ACL issue. Plus, what on earth do the council have to hide. They have a responsibility to the taxpayer to behave lawfully, and we all have a right to transparency when it comes to how the council spend your contributions, especially when the sum is so significant and the cause such a controversial one.
ACL are clearly encumbered by the decisions and weight of a third party, and as a result, we now start this upcoming campaign with a HUGE handicap.
Perhaps it's time to be resilient, get backsides on seats at Sixfields, and support the team. We should even champion the high-court action. We quite literally have nothing to lose now. Except the hunger and desire of our players.
How about delivering a big FU to ACL/CCC by refusing to be brainwashed any further!?
He means the football club as recognised by the only body that matters - the football league.
My boldingSISU operative? You sir, are on drugs. I'll say for the last time, I am in no way linked with SISU. Infact, i'm not a SISU sympathiser, i'm just someone very aggrieved by the retarded finger pointing at SISU (EXCLUSIVELY ON THIS MATTER) when the blame for all this shit clearly lies elsewhere.
Come on aj... did you really expect anyone to read the original post all the way through. Laughed at the second poster who said 'exactly' as if he / she had(yeah, right) - just wanted to join in agreement with the anti-ACL sentiment.
Having just listened to TF, I know where my anger is mainly (if not fully) aimed.
He means the football club as recognised by the only body that matters - the football league.
Northampton was and is only a temporary measure. Ricoh negotiations will resume soon. If we show resilience as fans, and show we will support the club and their decisions by going there, then it gives them a much stronger position when it comes to fruitful negotiation.
Yep. As the great Eric Cantona once said: ""When the seagulls follow the trawler, it's because they think sardines will be thrown into the sea. Thank you very much."
(I didn't know what the f**k he was on about either!)
Oh so you love the FL now do you?
As I say on FB, the club is in liquidation, no ground, no fanbase, no money and half a squad starting the season 10 pts down, where in there is the incentive for anyone to go and support the team.
By jingo, you're right! The blame clearly lies elsewhere. With Otium entertainment group!Wow, going for a strength in numbers argument there are we chap? There are far more idiots in the world than smart people. I'm happy being the minority. I don't need my band of merry men and their ignorance and vulgarity to support my stupidity, thanks.
SISU operative? You sir, are on drugs. I'll say for the last time, I am in no way linked with SISU. Infact, i'm not a SISU sympathiser, i'm just someone very aggrieved by the retarded finger pointing at SISU (EXCLUSIVELY ON THIS MATTER) when the blame for all this shit clearly lies elsewhere.
That's a very negative view. If you don't support the team, what's the point?
Today's news is both shocking and disappointing.
ACL have today shown their true colours; After reading that one of the conditions of CVA was that SISU retract their high-court action against the council, one cannot escape the impression that ACL really speaking are being controlled by the council who have their own agenda. From a business perspective, ACL have committed suicide today, and the only explanation is that another entity is pulling the strings.
The truths in the matter show how blinded some of us have been become as a result of our impatience with SISU over the last few years and our susceptibility to the propaganda vomited into the public domain by the council/CET etc. If this were any organisation other than SISU (or a SISU owned enterprise), people would very clearly see the wood for the trees.
ACL have claimed to want to put an end to this matter.
They claim to want to resolve all issues and return CCFC to Coventry.
They claim to have put a wonderful offer on the table.
Yet;
They are being bullish and threatening another football club with legal action for their involvement in helping us complete our fixtures.
They make CVA (which is in the best interests of the club) conditional on us accepting their offer and revoking high-court action.
They have refused CVA which is going to hugely affect us with our new campaign which at the very least has cost us points and crucial time to manoeuvre in the transfer market.
They are clearly trying to cause damage to the club, and you must consider if they are doing it off their own back, or on the instruction of a third party (CCC). Goodwill has to exist in business, and a no-strings CVA agreement would have been a positive step in putting all this manure behind us, and they would have recovered a considerable sum of the money owed. To insist that CCFC must retract high-court action is clearly not an ACL issue. Plus, what on earth do the council have to hide. They have a responsibility to the taxpayer to behave lawfully, and we all have a right to transparency when it comes to how the council spend your contributions, especially when the sum is so significant and the cause such a controversial one.
ACL are clearly encumbered by the decisions and weight of a third party, and as a result, we now start this upcoming campaign with a HUGE handicap.
Perhaps it's time to be resilient, get backsides on seats at Sixfields, and support the team. We should even champion the high-court action. We quite literally have nothing to lose now. Except the hunger and desire of our players.
How about delivering a big FU to ACL/CCC by refusing to be brainwashed any further!?
That's a very negative view. If you don't support the team, what's the point?
The Higgs still were willing to sell though, and SISU through limited had first dibs but SISU never took up the offer and just walked away.hey at least they are offering to sell the ricoh back to the club
oh wait..
Was that aimed at me?Nomark more like...
Why would that be? Would they have had to pay?The Higgs still were willing to sell though, and SISU through limited had first dibs but SISU never took up the offer and just walked away.
Take a wild guess...Was that aimed at me?
Why would that be? Would they have had to pay?
Yes the charity stepped in and bought the club share when we were under the cosh under the previous mob running the club. There was an agreed formula for the sale of the share back to the club which SISU obviously didn't like the look of.
Ok answer this. Based I'm the statements today from fisher, ACL and the administrator in your view did ACL offer the £150,000 rent deal to sisu/otium or to the administrator only if otium were not involved?
Ok answer this. Based I'm the statements today from fisher, ACL and the administrator in your view did ACL offer the £150,000 rent deal to sisu/otium or to the administrator only if otium were not involved?
Coventry have been offered a new 10-year rental agreement by the owners of the city's Ricoh Arena.
Arena Coventry Limited say they will sign a Company Voluntary Arrangement and help City avoid a new 15-point penalty if the club's owners abandon a move to Northampton's Sixfields home and return to the Ricoh.
Under the terms of the proposed new deal Coventry would pay £150,000 annual rent while they remain in League One, rising to £400,000 if they win promotion to the Championship.
Ok answer this. Based I'm the statements today from fisher, ACL and the administrator in your view did ACL offer the £150,000 rent deal to sisu/otium or to the administrator only if otium were not involved?
Today's news is both shocking and disappointing.
ACL have today shown their true colours; After reading that one of the conditions of CVA was that SISU retract their high-court action against the council, one cannot escape the impression that ACL really speaking are being controlled by the council who have their own agenda. From a business perspective, ACL have committed suicide today, and the only explanation is that another entity is pulling the strings.
The truths in the matter show how blinded some of us have been become as a result of our impatience with SISU over the last few years and our susceptibility to the propaganda vomited into the public domain by the council/CET etc. If this were any organisation other than SISU (or a SISU owned enterprise), people would very clearly see the wood for the trees.
ACL have claimed to want to put an end to this matter.
They claim to want to resolve all issues and return CCFC to Coventry.
They claim to have put a wonderful offer on the table.
Yet;
They are being bullish and threatening another football club with legal action for their involvement in helping us complete our fixtures.
They make CVA (which is in the best interests of the club) conditional on us accepting their offer and revoking high-court action.
They have refused CVA which is going to hugely affect us with our new campaign which at the very least has cost us points and crucial time to manoeuvre in the transfer market.
They are clearly trying to cause damage to the club, and you must consider if they are doing it off their own back, or on the instruction of a third party (CCC). Goodwill has to exist in business, and a no-strings CVA agreement would have been a positive step in putting all this manure behind us, and they would have recovered a considerable sum of the money owed. To insist that CCFC must retract high-court action is clearly not an ACL issue. Plus, what on earth do the council have to hide. They have a responsibility to the taxpayer to behave lawfully, and we all have a right to transparency when it comes to how the council spend your contributions, especially when the sum is so significant and the cause such a controversial one.
ACL are clearly encumbered by the decisions and weight of a third party, and as a result, we now start this upcoming campaign with a HUGE handicap.
Perhaps it's time to be resilient, get backsides on seats at Sixfields, and support the team. We should even champion the high-court action. We quite literally have nothing to lose now. Except the hunger and desire of our players.
How about delivering a big FU to ACL/CCC by refusing to be brainwashed any further!?
Ok answer this. Based I'm the statements today from fisher, ACL and the administrator in your view did ACL offer the £150,000 rent deal to sisu/otium or to the administrator only if otium were not involved?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?