There must’ve been conversations between interested parties right?You also wouldn't buy the ground on the assumption you then agree a deal with the football club. You either agree that deal beforehand, or you don't really need the football club and if it comes up at some point then you'll deal with it and decide whether it's worth the hassle or not.
You'd assume so, but the result of those isn't necessarily that the club's for sale, is it. The result, in fact, might be that it's reiterated we're moving to Warwick Uni in eight years, so knock yourself out with buying the Arena.There must’ve been conversations between interested parties right?
You'd assume so, but the result of those isn't necessarily that the club's for sale, is it. The result, in fact, might be that it's reiterated we're moving to Warwick Uni in eight years, so knock yourself out with buying the Arena.
No one’s confirming it thoughThere must’ve been conversations between interested parties right?
Could very well all be under NDAsNo one’s confirming it though
Certain I’d think it’s likely whoever wins the ACL purchase will influence the next step.There must’ve been conversations between interested parties right?
Yes look. And looked like others were being sold but were not. It looked like other offers were rejected.
And every player at every club has a price. Especially at our club.
Occams Razor says that it’s what it looks like. Rumours we are close to admin, HMRC debts, club clearly in trouble financially. O’Hare fell through last minute so we’re double fucked. And Sisu have been telling everyone they only want the stadium in admin so why would their partner gazump them?
Who has said we are close to admin? HMRC was a pretty standard thing because of cashflow.
I dunno, I genuinely think a proper multi purpose facility at Warwick Uni would be a better option than the Arena. The biggest travesty with SISU is they've completely discredited any possibilty of a new stadium for a generation whoever the owners are, even if it were to be the better option for the club.Funnily enough you’d rather that be a lie
Well that was a long read
So we don't know for sure that Ashley is the preferred bidder yet we seem to know for sure that there has been no communication between Ashley and SISU
CCFC has been for sale since SISU took over. The only problem is for most of the time we haven't been worth anywhere near what they would accept.
My guess would be that Ashley is the preferred bidder and has been in contact with Joy. Why would anyone be informed of private meetings? Those who have told us that Ashley has not been in discussion in taking over our club are not in a position to know. They might have been in contact for ages waiting to see what happens when the bonds were due.
My reasoning is the lack of player sales. The only player to be sold was after we knew that we had a lack of income at the start of the season. And it wasn't one of our main valuable players who would have raised even more money. SISU wouldn’t want to put another penny in if a deal had already been agreed. And what use would buying our club have if he couldn't purchase the ground? Ashley would be able to recoup half/most of the outlay for our club on players values/sales.
Cost? A total guess but ACL in administration. Offer 60p in the £. Most bond investors will still have made a profit on something that has gone so wrong. Total of 21m. 30m to SISU?
Could all be done by the January transfer deadline. Wouldn't take much for us to become a top 6 side. Already showing we have the nucleus of a good team. Just 6 months with promotion would gain Ashley more than double his initial outlay.
Any opportunity to crowbar that in.Occams Razor
Any opportunity to crowbar that in.
Operation Premiership!!1!From Ashley's point of view his best outcome is to buy us now or before January because?
ITKs over the summer. I’ll see if I can find the post.
We’ve all been waiting 10 years, starting to get impatient now.With The silence and secrecy that's always surrounded sisu I wouldn't be surprised in the slightest if one morning we woke up and they're gone . I don't think there are any in the knows who would dare speaking in public let alone on a forum like this, in fact I think there is hardly anyone who really knows what's going on , and with so much money at stake that's the way it will stay until there a big announcement or one party says it's over. We just have to wait. PUSB.
He did, I don’t see what he gets out of paying that thoughDidn’t Ashley offer to refinance the bond or have I made that up?
There was talk of it definitely. My assumption was he just used it as an excuse to do due diligence on the arena but maybe not.Didn’t Ashley offer to refinance the bond or have I made that up?
Yes, he did.Didn’t Ashley offer to refinance the bond or have I made that up?
Former Newcastle owner Mike Ashley has held talks with Wasps about a potential takeover as the debt-ridden club battle for their survival.
Sportsmail has learned that the negotiations stemmed from an offer from Ashley to refinance £35million worth of bonds taken out by the club’s owner, Wasps Holdings, to fund their move to Coventry in 2014 that were due to be repaid last May.
Ashley is understood to have signed a Head of Terms agreement with Wasps Holdings to refinance their debt, but the deal collapsed due to a shortage of time.
Wasps Holdings have since sounded out Ashley about buying the club and the Coventry Building Society Arena, with the Sports Direct magnate one of five interested parties as they urgently seek a buyer ahead of next Monday’s winding-up petition deadline set by HM Revenue and Customs.
Ashley retains an interest in Wasps at the right price, but has yet to make a formal offer and may not do so given the state of the club’s finances.
In addition to the £35m bond debt Wasps also owe £2m in unpaid taxes to HMRC, have an outstanding loan to Sport England that was provided to help them through Covid.
Wasps owner Derek Richardson is understood to be asking around £50m for the club, plus an immediate cash injection of £12m to cover short-term running costs.
There was talk of it definitely. My assumption was he just used it as an excuse to do due diligence on the arena but maybe not.
Makes it even more mad if he intends to keep a debt on the place and not own the football club though.
From Ashley's point of view his best outcome is to buy us now or before January because?
You also wouldn't buy the ground on the assumption you then agree a deal with the football club. You either agree that deal beforehand, or you don't really need the football club and if it comes up at some point then you'll deal with it and decide whether it's worth the hassle or not.
I dunno, I genuinely think a proper multi purpose facility at Warwick Uni would be a better option than the Arena. The biggest travesty with SISU is they've completely discredited any possibilty of a new stadium for a generation whoever the owners are, even if it were to be the better option for the club.
There's no particular reason why Ashley needs the football club however, or why SISU need to sell to Ashley. Neither have any particular emotional tie to the area, so SISU might be quite happy renting if its a decent deal, and Ashley might be quite happy developing a leisure complex.
Unifying ground and club isn't the only solution to this. It's one of them, but...
Party in 2030 thenMy honest opinion; they're gone within the next eight years,
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?