….unless they reach the PremWell by 'they put in £4.5 million' obviously yes that means they got it from investors. But carrying on as they are, they are never, ever going to get the total investment back. Not even close.
View attachment 27023View attachment 27024 Getting closer.............
It’s the reason I keep posting.View attachment 27023View attachment 27024 Getting closer.............
Isn’t CCFC part of an investment fund? Therefore not the only part of a particular fund.….unless they reach the Prem
….get some really lucky transfers like £20m for Gyok (McBurnie was more and he’s useless) , £15m for whoever, this sell on, that Cup run (Look IDGAF that atm it’s pie in the sky, but I’m playing Devils Advocate)
….Get the CBS for very little (£15m might have been their fantasy) and revalue / sell the lot for £60m plus £15m and get out of jail. This was the plan from 8 years ago too but the numbers were different. They had to keep trying through the courts because they couldn’t afford not to.
The above, I believe, we’re SISU’s exit plans.
Selling for lots less - they cannot do.
The arena option looks to have fallen by the wayside.
Crystalising their loss isn’t an option I don’t think.
Is the effect still the same though, it’s listed as an investment of x million in CCFC generating x amount of interest per year?Won't show up on the sisu capital Ltd accounts, they are part of an investment funds for their clients
Yes, but the point remains: if the total fund is £560m and CCFC is £60m, then (sell CCFC for and) get a return of £ 20m, the fund can only be valued at £500m with £20m in cash. £520m. It’s lost £40m. Investors won’t be happy. You can’t just make numbers up, there usually has to be substantive asset behind the assertion.Isn’t CCFC part of an investment fund? Therefore not the only part of a particular fund.
wouldn’t it only be a loss if the entire fund was losing money?
I don’t agree.
They are a hedge fund.
Definition:
A hedge fund is a limited partnership of private investors whose money is managed by professional fund managers who use a wide range of strategies, including leveraging or trading of non-traditional assets, to earn above-average investment returns.
——
So long as SISU shows its investors that the value of their investment increases then that’s all dandy.
The various “funds” show that the money in CCFC is earning £2m per year in interest. On paper. That’s the key. On paper.
It looks to me that on paper SISU have CCFC at £60m.
Sell for less and they have a problem.
Ok.no they have ccfc at far less than that
Think I preferred the chocolate bants to the Russell Brand type vocabulary.
I like the bounties but I don't touch them until the end so I get an equal share of the rest then all the bounties when everybody else is done
Pure class this(from a Ferrero Roche fan)
White Loin bar pleaseTwo of the worst chocolates there are. Someone get me a Lion bar for fuck's sake
You’re nuts, has to be Lindt.Pure class this(from a Ferrero Roche fan)
I like Lion bars and Ferrero Rocher.Two of the worst chocolates there are. Someone get me a Lion bar for fuck's sake
Two of the worst chocolates there are. Someone get me a Lion bar for fuck's sake
That is how i read it, but i know nothing lolI guess those loses show up as debtors on SISUs accounts and so effectively an asset? Would that be why they’d manufacture “losses” and hang around, it inflates their balance sheet? Or have I got that all wrong…
HussyI like Lion bars and Ferrero Rocher.
Ok.
Let’s have the deep dive - waiting.
Or a sarky, unconstructive comment like a 12 year old.
let’s see…..
12.Its been explained over and over again to you but oddly you just ignore it. Ccfc owner related debt is in that region
Still even a 12 year old wouldn’t claim wages to be £3 to £4 million would they
what’s the craic then
I think they are drawn to it because it's making a loss. It must be their fetish.Some Wasps fans want here for the new ground, i think the main stand might still be too big
Click on the link, the stand only holds a few hundred lol.I think they are drawn to it because it's making a loss. It must be their fetish.
Depends on whose nuts to be honest.The general consensus is that chocolate with nuts in are good
Flake without the crumble is a twirlLoved Mars as a kid, think they are too bland now.
Caramel-based chocolates, oh yes, now feel too sweet.
Galaxy ripple, a flake without the crumble, oh yes please.
Yorkie raisin and biscuit is my favourite.Flake without the crumble is a twirl
Caramel, big fan.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?