It's not a quote attributed to anybody, the article just vaguely says 'The Hottinger package involved match-funding from Coventry City Council'. Does it mean CCC would match the investment funding, or is it about funding of matches? Either way, surely not something that would get through.
Exactly. They will always be up to something.This is all starting to feel like deja vu to when Wasps first arrived.
Majority of people saying the rumours are ridiculous, of course the council wouldn't be stupid enough to think moving a London club to the Ricoh would work. Strange accounts being fired up to push that its all SISUs fault. People out defending the council.
The NEC wasnt ever really a goer i heard
Same with the training ground... The one he handed to his mate when it all went to shit.Something fishy is going on. I have a horrible feeling that Richardson is still going to be involved with the arena once Ashley gets his hands on it.
This is all starting to feel like deja vu to when Wasps first arrived.
Majority of people saying the rumours are ridiculous, of course the council wouldn't be stupid enough to think moving a London club to the Ricoh would work. Strange accounts being fired up to push that its all SISUs fault. People out defending the council.
Who?Oh fun, we’re back at the “everyone who has a different opinion to mine is a paid troll” point of debate. Always fruitful.
‘ITK’s’ from Wasps site claim Richardson nothing to do with their takeover.
I read on one of the forums that some fans believe it was very fishy saving Wasps back in 2012 and that there is a feeling he only took them over as he wanted the Arena and surrounding land for property investments.
Could be that Ashley and him go on a joint venture to develop the land around the Arena. Would also make sense if Ashley is not interested in CCFC at present (or at least saying he is not to keep Reeves sweet).
The takeover they've got is essentially somebody buying the badge; why would Richardson want to do that when it's already cost him a fortune?‘ITK’s’ from Wasps site claim Richardson nothing to do with their takeover.
I read on one of the forums that some fans believe it was very fishy saving Wasps back in 2012 and that there is a feeling he only took them over as he wanted the Arena and surrounding land for property investments.
Could be that Ashley and him go on a joint venture to develop the land around the Arena. Would also make sense if Ashley is not interested in CCFC at present (or at least saying he is not to keep Reeves sweet).
Has Richardson's planning permission expired?I don’t understand why Ashley would want or need Richardson’s involvement
I can see why people would see that there might be an underhand property developer angle with the area around the arena but we have to ask the question:‘ITK’s’ from Wasps site claim Richardson nothing to do with their takeover.
I read on one of the forums that some fans believe it was very fishy saving Wasps back in 2012 and that there is a feeling he only took them over as he wanted the Arena and surrounding land for property investments.
Could be that Ashley and him go on a joint venture to develop the land around the Arena. Would also make sense if Ashley is not interested in CCFC at present (or at least saying he is not to keep Reeves sweet).
Has Richardson's planning permission expired?
Plans for hotel by CBS Arena stall after funding expires
A deadline has been missed for the hotel by the arena, the West Midlands Combined Authority says.www.bbc.co.uk
Thanks for that.DT this morning - a disgrace
View attachment 27195
Clickbait
Well at least it’s some type of assurance. Interesting about exclusivity
A club that has to sell players for profit (or assets) in order to compete at a level that is beyond its income.
Not all clubs are selling clubs, (man City payed100 million for a sub) but too many for comfort. Extortionate wages and agent fees don't help matters.Isnt that all clubs? Selling players is part of pretty much everyone’s business model. Are Chelsea a selling club because they have the loan factory making them money?
Richardson is right, no point voting on a deal that had zero chance of success given the match funding from CCC was not happening
More likely SISU would hold on to end of season just in case there was a sniff of promotion - and a much bigger valueIf todays win against QPR, our great run, and us now being top of the current form table (last 10) doesn't attract an MA bid, then nothing will.
Surely he's got to see an opportunity here for a modest, January investment, which could possibly pay very lucrative dividends...assuming SISU don't play stupid buggers with the price.
C'mon Mike...get your fat cheque book out.
Except they won't give us a penny in January, so our small squad's results, will probably fade away with injuries for the 2nd year in successionMore likely SISU would hold on to end of season just in case there was a sniff of promotion - and a much bigger value
But also it will drive the price up. He will want to drive it down and SISU will want guaranteed return. I think they will look to offload a few players in Jan. Easier money that negotiating with MA.If todays win against QPR, our great run, and us now being top of the current form table (last 10) doesn't attract an MA bid, then nothing will.
Surely he's got to see an opportunity here for a modest, January investment, which could possibly pay very lucrative dividends...assuming SISU don't play stupid buggers with the price.
C'mon Mike...get your fat cheque book out.
But also it will drive the price up. He will want to drive it down and SISU will want guaranteed return. I think they will look to offload a few players in Jan. Easier money that negotiating with MA.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?