SISU have stopped legal processes as requested! EC will investigate in their own right and not at the Behest of SISU, in fact anyone who looks to have broken state aid rules in Europe will get investigated! after all this shite i hope the city fans start to demonstrate outside the RICOH on saturday
Isn't the legal process carried out by the commission?SISU haven't stopped a legal process in theory. Okay it is not through courts. But, the Eurpean Commission do make judgements on legal matters. So same script different route.
You should have two accounts. Every time you post something I'm trying to work out what inside info is involved.Absolutely spot on
They may live to regret this I suspect
Haha was just thinking that.You should have two accounts. Every time you post something I'm trying to work out what inside info is involved.
SISU still perusing same script via different route. Commission not a court but can still judge on legal matters. So not much changed.So to sum up:
Wasps say legal action must be stopped
Legal action stops
Two year deal agreed
Wasps change the requirements to 'all proceedings surrounding acquisition and ownership of the Ricoh'
Absolute c**ts. That has never been the requirement.
Interestingly Reid is reporting that the EC is investigating which suggests to me they aren't dismissing it out of hand and feel there is something that requires investigation. Again I'm not comfortable with blackmail being used to avoid scrutiny of the actions of public bodies using taxpayers money.
Gilbert has been played like a fiddle and in his desperation to get some sort of 'exclusive' and get one over on Reid he hasn't stopped to think why he's being fed certain information or the damage making it public could do.
There is now action against wasps. You ine of those trust weirdosSISU still perusing same script via different route. Commission not a court but can still judge on legal matters. So not much changed.
He won't be, because he is pushing the story on their behalf.SISU at pains to point out its vs CCC and nawt to do with WASPs. So what's the problem?
This is what Gilbert needs to be asking
Yes so same result....but if you want to split hairs to suit your agenda. You could argue the SISU legal team carry out the legal process not SISU. SISU are still perusing a legal outcome, so nothing has changed. Just my view without blaming anybody. Have no time for SISU Wasps CCC or any of the other players past or present to be honest.Isn't the legal process carried out by the commission?
Yes so same result....but if you want to split hairs to suit your agenda. You could argue the SISU legal team carry out the legal process not SISU. SISU are still perusing a legal outcome, so nothing has changed. Just my view without blaming anybody. Have no time for SISU Wasps CCC or any of the other players past or present to be honest.
It's not a legal process and it's not against wasps so ccfc are not in breach of their agreement to open talksYes so same result....but if you want to split hairs to suit your agenda. You could argue the SISU legal team carry out the legal process not SISU. SISU are still perusing a legal outcome, so nothing has changed. Just my view without blaming anybody. Have no time for SISU Wasps CCC or any of the other players past or present to be honest.
Oh all of the accounts have been in overdrive all day bullshitting.What?
Sorry your post doesn't make senseThere is now action against wasps. You ine of those
Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
If someone at sisu was murdered I could probably see a bit ofCan you imagine any other scenario where a possible guilty party would blackmail the victim to not report a crime and people would be ok with it?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sorry your post doesn't make sense
It is still seeking a legal outcomeIt's not a legal process and it's not against wasps so ccfc are not in breach of their agreement to open talks
Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
Of course. But still a process with the potential of a legal outcome. So no different from a pending court case. Nick I know you are not that thick.The result is only if they even find anything wrong to even start an investigation isn't it? They may well just throw it straight out without investigating if they find nothing wrong.
But what is their issue with an investigation that costs them nothing if they're certain of no wrongdoing?Of course. But still a process with the potential of a legal outcome. So no different from a pending court case. Nick I know you are not that thick.
Okay mate you want to keep peddling the same disproven lines then so be it. Nick's already dealt with you.It is still seeking a legal outcome
What a wanker that c**t is. Lives in AustraliaSeen it all now haha, the sky blue express at the bottom is a weird thing to add
Stealing that.
He seemed to fail to mention when we got promoted. Funny that, it's these selective city fansWhat a wanker that c**t is. Lives in Australia
Easy question for you then. What court is hearing the case and who is the claimant and who is the defendant?SISU haven't stopped a legal process in theory. Okay it is not through courts. But, the Eurpean Commission do make judgements on legal matters. So same script different route.
I'm not sure he understands what indemnifying means.What?
Incredible isn't it. We're talking about tens of millions in taxpayer money and all anyone is concerned about is not upsetting a London rugby club.Can you imagine any other scenario where a possible guilty party would blackmail the victim to not report a crime and people would be ok with it?
Do you have a tiny penis? What the hell is wrong with youHe's genuinely a moron
Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
I thought you were against all forms of bullying?Do you have a tiny penis? What the hell is wrong with you
I'm not sure he understands what indemnifying means.
I'm not sure he understands what indemnifying means.
I suggest you 're read my post and others. They are still pursuing a legal outcome. You are just splitting hairs.Easy question for you then. What court is hearing the case and who is the claimant and who is the defendant?
I assume Otium, Avro or SISU must be the claimant and Wasps the defendant else the conditions Wasps placed on talks have been met. Can you confirm?
Bless, he thinks that would hurt me. Pete are you thick? You have been proven wrong umpteen times yet keep repeating the same thing.Do you have a tiny penis? What the hell is wrong with you
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?