All I hear is the drunken whinging of a sore loser. Not one objective comment, it’s all outrage that the ref wasn’t giving them the decisions they wanted.As some of you know, I actually don't mind Sunderland, and this chap is always good value,
- but - it is hard to watch this without laughing/chuckling. Give it a go...
All I hear is the drunken whinging of a sore loser. Not one objective comment, it’s all outrage that the ref wasn’t giving them the decisions they wanted.
I had to stop after 2 minutes, his voice was grating my nervous system.
This - and you are quite right, we've all been there, with Sky Blue tinted glasses on. As I say, although he's mad as a box of frogs at times, he is also loveably passionate about his team.The perceived injustice of a passionate fan
Look at the state of his bedroom.. he’s a grown man ffsAs some of you know, I actually don't mind Sunderland, and this chap is always good value,
- but - it is hard to watch this without laughing/chuckling. Give it a go...
I could not stop laughing, i had to turn off to get my breath back , hahahaaaaaaa
The only way I’d find that amusing, is if he was parodying a stereotypical Mackem.I thought it was brilliant to be fair
Watch Sky analysis after the game. They thought one of the tackles was a foul, but seeing it from a different camera angle, they agreed it was a good hard tackle and he played the ball.Think the hand balls were a bit of wishful thinking but VAR probably gives one of them. He has a point about the fowls leading up to the goal though. Must admit surprised we got away with that but so what we won
As some of you know, I actually don't mind Sunderland, and this chap is always good value,
- but - it is hard to watch this without laughing/chuckling. Give it a go...
As some of you know, I actually don't mind Sunderland, and this chap is always good value,
- but - it is hard to watch this without laughing/chuckling. Give it a go...
Text-book Incel. Or at least, I hope so, and his genes won't go any further.
He was annoyed at the diving and whinging so he said fuck it. Literally. Jack Clark roberts and the French guy did that to themselvesThink the hand balls were a bit of wishful thinking but VAR probably gives one of them. He has a point about the fowls leading up to the goal though. Must admit surprised we got away with that but so what we won
Sadly, the buildup to the first goal is a great example of the way the game has gone recently. I felt both challenges were fair, the player didn't launch himself and got the ball both times. Yes, it's 1970s style or "agricultural" tackling but that seems to be outlawed by fans when the tackles are against their players. Football used to be a contact sport. Now someone somewhere has deemed it should be ballet instead.
And the handballs.... the FA made a clear policy announcement at the beginning of the season that if a persons arm is by their side (in a standard silhouette) or extended to prevent or slow falling, a ball striking the arm or hand is not deemed to be a foul. Can't remember the first one but the shout against Fadz, his arm was definitely not raised.
But if we want to talk about fouls or cards that should have been, Roberts should have been shown at least a yellow for persistent simulation. And both Ballard and Baath/Batth/Bathh should have been shown yellows for pulling back Vik on numerous occasions.
Yes, the ref was poor (certainly not a cheat as the opposition fans feel) but he was poor to both teams.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?