Martin180
Well-Known Member
I’m not trying to defend him 100% as he alongside most have had good and bad spells this season , it’s the he’s useless drivel that winds me up about him and other members of the squad
I’m not trying to defend him 100% as he alongside most have had good and bad spells this season , it’s the he’s useless drivel that winds me up about him and other members of the squadI thought Dasilva made a couple of mistakes for the first 2 Preston goals, and just didn't seem to be there mentally.
Is your source GIMOC?Yea just seen the Kitching picture.
Could i be having the plonker pulled?
Late change lads
This illness going round
Kitching and Bidwell swapped for Binks and DaSilva
Vindicated at least!Yea just seen the Kitching picture.
Could i be having the plonker pulled?
And Wilson.... They were both horrendous Vs Preston.Gobsmacked DaSilva is in there, insane decision
And Wilson.... They were both horrendous Vs Preston.
Bloody illness ..
We are away to one of the top sides, not bad to be strong defensively
Well if we were going to insist on starting Bidwell against Maidstone then it was always more likely he would have to start tonight. Playing 3ATB, where Robins seems to prefer Dasilva, is another factor too.Gobsmacked DaSilva is in there, insane decision
Time to give this page a wide berth for an hour while the usual meltdown continues
I’m gonna assume it is injury/illness keeping Bidwell out and Dasilva in, there’s no other explanation.
Don't switch over to Twitter.Time to give this page a wide berth for an hour while the usual meltdown continues
Well if we were going to insist on starting Bidwell against Maidstone then it was always more likely he would have to start tonight. Playing 3ATB, where Robins seems to prefer Dasilva, is another factor too.
I am now convinced Robins doesn’t want to get us promoted.
So Palmer and O’Hare on either flank? Not a lot of natural width in that first XI, except from MVE and Dasilva.Looks like 433 the way they’ve listed it there. Let’s see
No, suspect the box formation.So Palmer and O’Hare on either flank? Not a lot of natural width in that first XI, except from MVE and Dasilva.
Is it possible Binks and Dasilva were set to play all along?Yea just seen the Kitching picture.
Could i be having the plonker pulled?
I’m not sure, but as I mentioned above, whichever formation it is I think we’re starting Dasilva to offer us some width in a starting XI without any natural wide players. But I’d be very worried about Dasilva getting enough defensive protection if we’re playing with a back 4.do you think it’s a back 3 and wing backs? I didn’t notice Eccles at 1st glance. Could be him alongside Lati and Torp but maybe you’re right and Lati alongside Binks and Thomas! I’m a little more comfortable with Da Silva as a wing back, he’ll never a left back as long as he has a hole in his arse
So Palmer and O’Hare on either flank? Not a lot of natural width in that first XI, except from MVE and Dasilva.
There is no way that is a 4/3/3So Palmer and O’Hare on either flank? Not a lot of natural width in that first XI, except from MVE and Dasilva.
3 at the back, MVE and Da Silva wing backsGobsmacked DaSilva is in there, insane decision
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?