After last night I wouldn’t be opposed to going back to the box, tell them to sit in and be hard to beat and try to hit teams on the break again. O’Hare and Sakamoto were probably the only players that looked decent yesterday.
Not necessarily, I was just wondering how we can fix the mess we’re currently in. I think we need a formation change personally but I’m sure that’s not the only option available, just wondered if people had any other ideas?Another formation thread…joyous.
I don’t think 5212 doesn’t work full stop but it’s certainly not working now.Yeah that’s my thinking as well, some people don’t like it but I’m utterly convinced this shitty formation doesn’t work. Relying on Ayari, Simms and Godden to do all of the work. The 5ATB situation seems to create this horseshoe shape that pens the opposition in but leaves the only options available ones that involve backwards or sidewards passes. That’s great if we could then create chances but our players seem incapable of making runs in between defenders, it’s almost like it’s too congested or something, it just doesn’t feel natural to me.
I think we need to go fully basic. As in basic basic.
4 4 1 1
Wilson
Latibeaudiere Thomas Kitching Bidwell
MVE Sheaf Allen Tats
Callum
Simms (Even though he's wank)
Yes its a major sea change, but there's enough on the bench to change if we need too, You'd assume MVE and DaSilva would attack more with Cover behind them, we shouldn't let the opposition in as much at the back and if Simms cant score with Tats, MVE and Callum feeding him then he may aswell take up Snooker
Fadz is too exposed in a 4, hence he drops out, I feel Thomas will be decent if all he has to do is head it and kick it away, and you have to play a 4million CB.
I think we need to go fully basic. As in basic basic.
4 4 1 1
Wilson
Latibeaudiere Thomas Kitching Bidwell
MVE Sheaf Allen Tats
Callum
Simms (Even though he's wank)
Yes its a major sea change, but there's enough on the bench to change if we need too, You'd assume MVE and DaSilva would attack more with Cover behind them, we shouldn't let the opposition in as much at the back and if Simms cant score with Tats, MVE and Callum feeding him then he may aswell take up Snooker
Fadz is too exposed in a 4, hence he drops out, I feel Thomas will be decent if all he has to do is head it and kick it away, and you have to play a 4million CB.
That’s too much change. Plus can’t see Callum starting.I think we need to go fully basic. As in basic basic.
4 4 1 1
Wilson
Latibeaudiere Thomas Kitching Bidwell
MVE Sheaf Allen Tats
Callum
Simms (Even though he's wank)
Apparently just having someone other than Eccles take corners will mean we score three or four extra goals per game, pretty simple really
We need to score more goals and concede less
I was being facetious, I apologise - I just think we can hammer out all of these plausible possibilities, and then, consequently, be filled with a false hope that the system will be changed, because we can see it needs to.Not necessarily, I was just wondering how we can fix the mess we’re currently in. I think we need a formation change personally but I’m sure that’s not the only option available, just wondered if people had any other ideas?
‘Sign an experienced target man in January’ would be an admission of total failure. It ain’t gonna happen.Formation is largely irrelevant. We just need most of the players to play better.
Having said that I see little point in playing two forwards at the moment as non of the three we gave are achieving anything, so I would be inclined to go to four in midfield. Simms and Wright have played in every game and it is not doing their confidence any good. Simms in particular has played a lot of football and I don't think it is helping him. Wright us devoid if confidence and if the crowd get in his back I can see it getting worse.
We need to sign an experienced target man in January who can hold the ball up and provide some sort focus for the team. Sheaf looks really frustrated by the lack of movement ahead of him. This will give us some time to develop Simms and Wright into the players we thought they were when we bought them.
Better to admit you have made a mistake and rectify it than plough on regardless. I would be surprised if we don’t sign another forward in January quite probably on loan. If we don't I think we will really struggle.‘Sign an experienced target man in January’ would be an admission of total failure. It ain’t gonna happen.
In my opinion the current formation only really worked because of Vik and Hamer. We basically play with 7 defensive players now. In an old 4-4-2 you'd have pretty much had 5 attacking players in a side. I don't see the need to play two defensive midfielders every game... And an extra centre back. We have a lot of possession but in meaningless areas of the pitch.Formation is largely irrelevant. We just need most of the players to play better.
Having said that I see little point in playing two forwards at the moment as none of the three we have are achieving anything, so I would be inclined to go to four in midfield. Simms and Wright have played in every game and it is not doing their confidence any good. Simms in particular has played a lot of football and I don't think it is helping him. Wright is devoid of confidence and if the crowd get in his back I can see it getting worse.
I was being facetious, I apologise - I just think we can hammer out all of these plausible possibilities, and then, consequently, be filled with a false hope that the system will be changed, because we can see it needs to.
MR is, as we know, notoriously stubborn. I would say, perhaps the last two results have emphasised how ineffective the system is, and a change could possibly coming.
Box midfield is the easiest and most likely solution. There's just a big gaping hold between midfield and attack. Need O'Hare back in sharpish as he's the only one to drop into that space and then drive forward with it. Him having another AM to link up with, and the fact that he can slip more balls through to the forwards, should also see an improvement in them as well. Wright was trying runs in behind, but no one spotted them/had the ability to make the pass. O'Hare will make us more direct, and quicker to transition. Also, did I mention O'Hare?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?