don't get the Andreu confidence at all. he didn't get a chance to do anything in league two and is coming back from a serious injury.
On the bench at best for the start of the season
Really hoping for a new number 1 as well.
He had a good game v Shrewsbury, who came 3rd in the league above, and we’ve decided to sign all their best players...
He looked like a class act before his untimely injury, has a very good career stats and even his last stint in the Championship was pretty good too. Oxford wanted him before we signed him (allegedly) so I’m confident he’ll play a role in L1.
I'll be surprised if either starts the first matchJones and Andreu in all your teams but after a season out I'm guessing one of them either won't get straight back to form or fitness and no guarantee they'll completely get back. Knee injuries notoriously difficult to return from. Hope I'm wrong but certainly got some options.
Anyone who thinks Grimmer will start ahead of Sterling is mad IMO. The kids on the verge of Chelsea team and an England youth player.
4231:
Burge
Sterling Willis Davies Brown
Ogogo Doyle
Jones Andreu Alassani
McNulty
S: LOB, MacDonald, Grimmer, Kelly, Bayliss, Shipley, JCH
442:
Burge
Sterling Willis Davies Brown
Jones Ogogo Andreu Alassani
McNulty JCH
S: LOB, MacDonald, Grimmer, Doyle, Bayliss, Shipley, Ponticelli
Nah he will be, he's waaaay too good not to be. Does anyone think we'd have reached the playoffs without him? Kid turned our season around and McNulty really benefits from his creativity, they have a cracking understanding.If Bayliss doesn't feel he'll be a significant cog this season do we think he'll bide his time ?
I think he will play a role, but not as a starter on day one.
Not really an advocate of 352 but city could play it similar to England with Grimmer dropping into a back 3 ala Walker.
Burge
Grimmer
Hyam
Willis
Sterling
Brown
Ogogo
Andreu
Bayliss
Jones
McNulty
I agree that Sterling would probably be ahead of Grimmer but he is young and inexperienced and won't play every game, his time will have to be managed. And I do think he will be used at RM a lot too, a position we have lacked depth in. I like the idea of him playing there and Grimmer overlapping with him, he can drop in to cover when required too.
I will say that anyone who has Alassani in their starting XI ahead of Bayliss as you do is mad, though! Bayliss is proven at L2 level (and excelled in the cup games against higher division sides too) and frankly looks to have the potential that Maddison does to go on and be a top flight player. Alassani might work out, he might not, but he's unproven at league level and it is going to take him time to adapt. It took Biamou half a season to adjust to L2 football: this is L1 and Alassani is coming from a much lower level. I think he's an impact sub for now and look to start games later in the season when he's had some coaching and our first team has injuries and tired players.
I think Bayliss is ahead of Jones and Andreu for a starting berth too regardless of shape-you fit him in, he's our best player. The other two are coming back from very serious knocks and will be phased in gradually I think.
What is great is having so much depth and flexibility!
He must be pissed off about the missing hyphen.When did we sign Peeling Oranges?
wecan rotate 4 sureDo not think Robins will change the back four much how it finished up end of last season, only possible change Davies for Hyam. Sterling may cover for Grimmer but start right mid. Brown will cover for Stokes, not first choice as many are thinking. As for the rest of the starting eleven I personally think Robins will rotate and select game by game. As pointed out by others there we be players leaving as we move throu July
Bayliss-mania bears little relation to reality. Look back through the player-ratings threads, and see how often people commented how quiet he was or how ineffective. This included the Wembley game.
There is no doubt he has class, but whether that class produces much AT THIS LEVEL is a moot point. There is a natural limit on his effectiveness because the players around him are not as skilled as he is, particularly at holding the ball. We could have somebody much more effective than Bayliss, even if less skilled (this is the reason Mourinho and Van Gaal like Fellaini incidentally - less skilled, but more effective).In addition we are playing Bayliss out of position anyway, and by the looks of the signings will continue to do so. Stirling would be the man for the right sided midfield slot surely.
What is the conversion rate at which point it is worth selling Bayliss? If there is such a thing. I x Bayliss provides cash for x new players, what is the value of x at which point it is worth selling him.
Incidentally, the point made above about Andreu and Jones both in the side on day 1 being unlikely is a point well made that I had not thought of. Midfield of Stirling, Andreu (or Kelly), Ogogo and Shipley in which case
Doyle will be off if he isn't played in all games. He will not be a bit part. MR has to find a way to play Ogogo and Doyle if he wants to keep him
I'm thinking with the players that Mark Robins is signing, he's going to play the same formation as England next season.We play with two DMs to be fair.
Chelsea fans see Sterling as a replacement for Victor Moses rather than a right back apparently. Others on here doubt that Jones will be fit enough to start the season. But I am easy either way. It does mean that there is no particular team need to hang on to Bayliss - Sterling/Jones will probably deliver moreI agree on the Bayliss-mania point. Selling him is justified if it meant getting some top quality replacements through the door. He’s under contract until 2020 so we don’t really need to make a decision about that until Jan 2019 at the earliest. If we can get off to a good start this season, we may be able to tie down our best players to longer contracts.
Jones was head and shoulders our best player before his injury. Why on earth would Sterling start right mid ahead of Jones?
I like Grimmer, but he makes mistakes that lead to goals, so in L1 we needed a better option. Sterling’s primary position is quite clearly right back, it’s a no-brainer.
If we’re looking at promotion from L1, a lot of people are going to have to get their heads around the fact that fan favourites will have a reduced role this season. Doyle, Kelly, Grimmer and Biamou will probably be casualties here.
Chelsea fans see Sterling as a replacement for Victor Moses rather than a right back apparently. Others on here doubt that Jones will be fit enough to start the season. But I am easy either way. It does mean that there is no particular team need to hang on to Bayliss - Sterling/Jones will probably deliver more
Hope so mate, I would hate to see Doyle go. Hopefully a coaching role awaits him at CCFC and I think that he definitely has potential to manage us one dayWe play with two DMs to be fair.
Doyle will be off if he isn't played in all games. He will not be a bit part. MR has to find a way to play Ogogo and Doyle if he wants to keep him
4-4-1-1 isn’t it?
I hope so, although I know that he likes to play and is a pain when injured. When dropped he kicks the crap out of his team mates in training. He does not like being a bit part player and thinks he has a season or two left in him and wants to play as much as possibleDoyle loves it here - it's why he came back and he has had an unbelievable season in terms of achievement and adulation. I think it more likely that any next move will be onto our coaching/management staff - worth his weight in gold to have as a role model around the youngsters.
I hope so, although I know that he likes to play and is a pain when injured. When dropped he kicks the crap out of his team mates in training. He does not like being a bit part player and thinks he has a season or two left in him and wants to play as much as possible
I'm thinking with the players that Mark Robins is signing, he's going to play the same formation as England next season.
Could be an interesting season.
I’ve had the same thought.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
4-4-1-1 isn’t it?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?