Morning, what is the point of posting on here just to get abused by some ? 90% are brilliant, thoughtful, helplful and constructive replies to posts people post on SBT, only to be spoilt by some mindless idiots who can't post an intelligent reply. let alone a polite on.
@ Nick....Check my "Username" then. I've got nothing to hide. You've obviously got my IP...Check it !.......I'm off but will look on the forum as a guest "Now and again".Bye, bye
IP addresses mean nothing most of the time anyway.I also didn't say you had anything to hide.
@ Nick...I never said you did......but Grenduffy seems to think so! please let him know "Officially" thanks
@ Nick...I never said you did......but Grenduffy seems to think so! please let him know "Officially" thanks
More farewells than Staus Quo.
..I haven't done any digging into usernames though.[unquote]....................This to me says "NO you didn't say that"....@fernandopartridge...and...@ lordsummerisle......Didn't your parents tell you "Not to interupt adults when they're talking"?
@ Nick.....I haven't done any digging into usernames though.[unquote]....................This to me says "NO you didn't say that"....@fernandopartridge...and...@ lordsummerisle......Didn't your parents tell you "Not to interupt adults when they're talking"?
@ Nick......I haven't done any digging into usernames though.[unquote]....................This to me says "NO you didn't say that"....@fernandopartridge...and...@ lordsummerisle......Didn't your parents tell you "Not to interupt adults when they're talking"?
I seem to remember you "Defending" Grenduffy when accused of having multiple identities. but you CBA to prove otherwise for me.....one word to you pal...."Wanker"
I seem to remember you "Defending" Grenduffy when accused of having multiple identities. but you CBA to prove otherwise for me.....one word to you pal...."Wanker"
What are you on about now? Another fine example of somebody who moans about abuse and arguing but goes on like this.
You've still been posting on here methinks.
Spion <cough> Kop <cough>
No proof of that to be fair, unless the quote thing was a front and he is a genius.
True I suppose more than one person has the inability to quote and calls me Battery Boy. I prefer torchospastic personally.
I need to goad "spoin Kop" into launching an abisuve tirade at me and signing off with "estimated facts....LMFAO" then the game is over.
VOR I am sure you are well aware that it's normal everyday life to have the Good and the Bad, with respect to this forum, I think differences of opinion can sometimes be clouded and posters can be pre-judged, for instance Grendel has a very good perspective on his posts and talks good sense, problem is people can pre-judge Grendel and then slate his opinion or not even give any his posts any time it deserves.
The thing with Grendel is you know he doesn't actually mean anything he says. He just likes to play the troll.
There are some reasonable opinions in there and every now and then you get a whole thread of them. Then it's back to "mucas" and illogical nonsense because he wants to wind someone up.
I think that's harsh, I am not sure he comes on here with the incentive of starting arguments or "playing the troll".
The issue with the "Mucas" thing is didn't we have a few of those silly names recently from certain other posters, (SISUE, Fishface, Joyless). I don't see much illogical posts from Grendel in truth, he speaks sense from whatever I see, but I think sometimes as I stated before you can see others write off any post because Grendel posts it or more yet when RFC posts on here he/she gets hails of abuse, I can't understand why.
Can I also just say it's amazing that RFC posts on here time after time, his opinion gets mocked 95% of the time, yet he/she never comes back with a derogatory response.
It does seem a lot of the people who moan don't seem to like other people's opinions being different to theirs. There is nothing worse than somebody moaning or reporting posts for being abusive simply because they don't agree with them but then reading through they are the ones dishing out the abuse.
To be fair the last couple of pages reads like you guys acting as a pack trying to get a rise. (Flaming?)
Do people really moan about using a forum where others don't agree with them??
The bit where I agreed with somebody and got called a Wanker for it or the bit where I said people keep reporting things they don't agree with as abusive? If people want to moan about things becoming abusive to then become abusive when people don't agree with them, I don't think it needs anybody trying to get a rise.
Why is it that people have started going on about "packs", it is worse than the phase when everybody was saying "gelling". Why are these "packs" only when people disagree also?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?