To be fair, he (LR) got the first interview with Joy. It would be great, if he were to reappear with a new interview from Joy explaining her plans for the future - perhaps with another paper seeing as the saga attracted plenty of national interest. I think Joy should be up for that - I would be, in her position, wanting to turn the return to the Ricoh and the continuing appeals into a positive scenario.
Seems strange that we don't hear anything from him.
To be fair, he (LR) got the first interview with Joy. It would be great, if he were to reappear with a new interview from Joy explaining her plans for the future - perhaps with another paper seeing as the saga attracted plenty of national interest. I think Joy should be up for that - I would be, in her position, wanting to turn the return to the Ricoh and the continuing appeals into a positive scenario.
Seems strange that we don't hear anything from him.
Les Reid has written articles for the Guardian and Private Eye and had won awards for political journalism - is that the barometer of a good journalist? I assume twitter followers can stop following? I'm sure many have.
Surely the 'gardening leave' can't last forever?
Maybe he is tending to 'Joy's garden' now.
He's working for Coventry Observer & posting on Twitter
Les Reid is an award-winning multi-media political correspondent, columnist and investigative reporter who has written for UK local and national newspapers for more than 15 years, now working for a free newspaper.
A reporter no one listens to at a paper no one reads. Seems like the perfect match.
Thats the future - the London Evening Standard is a free newspaper. The Guardian online is now free. Journalists get paid off and shoved out if they fall out with editors/owners or at a whim. They accept it as part of the job - it probably couldnt happen where we all work but is common practice in the murky world of the press.
Whilst it is true that the business model for newspapers has and continues to change, it is misleading to compare the London Evening Standard and an online version of a national newspaper against a local city free newspaper which is not the leading print newspaper of the city.
I am interested in reading his exclusive on why he disappeared from the limelight for so long.
What are gagging orders?
Gagging orders are better known in legal terms as confidentiality clauses. They are usually agreed when an employee leaves an employer, having been made redundant or after a disagreement or issue in the workplace.
How do they work?
The employer asks the employee to sign a compromise agreement, under which they waive their right to legal action. This could be in the form of a claim for unfair dismissal at an employment tribunal or a claim for breach of contract.
According to employment lawyers, most compromise agreements also include confidentiality clauses. These bar employees from talking publically or to the press about their former employer of the circumstances under which they left.
They can be far-reaching, barring an individual from even speaking to their spouse about the issue. One council barred an employee from making freedom of information or data protection requests.
Why do people sign them?
In return for signing the agreement and remaining silent, the employee is usually given a lump sum. Barry Warne, head of employment at HLW Keeble Hawson, said: "The employee is being bought off, often with more than his claim is really worth. It is the price of silence."
Why is it so controversial?
Under the terms of the Public Interest Disclosure act, whistleblowers are supposed to be protected. However, many believe that gagging orders have a "deterrent effect". "Employers can't sign away the right to whistleblow, but many people think they can," said Mr Warne.
Mr Warne believes the agreements should not be used in the public sector, except for matters of national security. "Everything in the public sector should be public information," he said.
What happens if people breach their agreement?
An employee could face demands for the return of the severance payment or be sued for damages in the High Court.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/9967899/Gagging-orders-explained.html
He was the subject of a gagging order which was public knowledge - so you clearly don't read very much.
What was he Gagging on
You are naive you mean you don't know
So who was supposed to be behind the conspiracy to get Les out of the CET.
He got into bed with SISU and fucked his career up. Unless you say that working for a local free rag is is a promotion.
He got into bed with SISU and fucked his career up. Unless you say that working for a local free rag is is a promotion.
Translated as he wrote stuff I didn't want to hear.
Basically, that's the way that I see it. It's just that you can make the point in one sentence.
Translated as he wrote stuff I didn't want to hear.
Or Translated something you and your cronies could have read together in a darkened room and creamed over
And anyway had nothing whatsoever to do with a story. However he has ruined his own career, so no need for me to go any further on a forum site?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?