HuckerbyDublinWhelan
Well-Known Member
I’d be ok with that... he’s selling a SISU win here
I’d be ok with that... he’s selling a SISU win hereFormer council leader and trust chairman John Fletcher is currently stating on twitter that SISU should drop the legal action as if they win Wasps will have to pay more.
If they win that means the council have done something they shouldn't.
Over the past few days there have been a fair few people calling out all sides to sort it out.
Strangely, there are a few of the people who have banged on and on about "SISU apologists" over the years who seem really really desperate in trying to defend the other sides and say how they have done nothing wrong.
It is getting to the point where it is slowly starting to show a few agendas and more people are noticing it. People seem to be desperate to tell everybody that Wasps and the Council have done nothing wrong at all and are really going into overdrive to the point of re-writing history.
It just seems that more and more people think that SISU, Wasps and CCC should all stop the pissing about and the games and are saying they all should sort it out for CCFC. Something that has been said by a few for months now. Strangely, some people won't have it.
Funnily enough, some of the people getting a bit desperate have links to the council. Make of that what you will.
Former council leader and trust chairman John Fletcher is currently stating on twitter that SISU should drop the legal action as if they win Wasps will have to pay more.
If they win that means the council have done something they shouldn't.
I’d be ok with that... he’s selling a SISU win here
I think I'll leave you to calm down a little. Yes, agree the football club doesn't have Ricoh Arena as an asset. But it won't have Ricoh as an asset if 13 Lord Justices have got it wrong and Arvo, SBS&L and Otium are handed it FOC with £200 zillion compensation. IT WILL BE SISU'S
If they win, it may then become certain we don't get to play at the Ricoh any more.
I prefer justice to prevail....but, I would be torn if it then meant the end of our club.
Why would it be certain we couldn't play there IF SISU were to win anything?
"may"
In what way though?
Sadly, there are always agendas.
When you have an ex council leader sat making images of bullshit quotes from SISU out of context and refusing to acknowledge any bullshit from the council side or when you have somebody who is heavily involved in the council making multiple social media accounts every other day to push the same sort of nonsense it shines through.
Which one are we on about here Shmmeee?We keep a chinese firewall on this stuff, it’s not worth the aggro, so I don’t know as much as you probably think I do. After Fisher went after him in the press it hurt him personally, that’s his agenda if you want one. He genuinely thinks Sisu are in the wrong and shouldn’t get the Ricoh.
The one time in the last year I’ve broken that firewall I outright asked about an agenda and distressing the club. He laughed at the idea. That’s good enough for me. I understand that might not be good enough for you, but I’ve known him for 37 years and am happy in my judgement.
Other than that he’s just a fan, man. Same as anyone else.
We keep a chinese firewall on this stuff, it’s not worth the aggro, so I don’t know as much as you probably think I do. After Fisher went after him in the press it hurt him personally, that’s his agenda if you want one. He genuinely thinks Sisu are in the wrong and shouldn’t get the Ricoh.
The one time in the last year I’ve broken that firewall I outright asked about an agenda and distressing the club. He laughed at the idea. That’s good enough for me. I understand that might not be good enough for you, but I’ve known him for 37 years and am happy in my judgement.
Other than that he’s just a fan, man. Same as anyone else.
But that's exactly what some have been saying. That those in positons of influence have a personal grievance with Fisher and / or SISU which is clouding their judgement.After Fisher went after him in the press it hurt him personally, that’s his agenda if you want one.
You need to ask the council. They're the ones talking about SISU winning.People talking about 'if Sisu win the next one' etc etc....when is that?
You need to ask the council. They're the ones talking about SISU winning.
There's no date, think people are guessing that it will be the he next couple of months based on how long other cases are taking to get to court.Really? I'm so out of the loop on everything to be honest. So there's no official court date for Round 318 of arguments?
My understanding is that the timelines for the next hearing for SISU will be after the EFL decision on whether we remain in the league. I can't envisage SISU dropping the case, so the variables on outcomes will include:There's no date, think people are guessing that it will be the he next couple of months based on how long other cases are taking to get to court.
But that's exactly what some have been saying. That those in positons of influence have a personal grievance with Fisher and / or SISU which is clouding their judgement.
Rather than pursing what is best for the football club they are instead targeting SISU no matter what the cost.
It's about more than that though, not just him but others as well seem to having hating SISU at the top of their priorities above saving / loving CCFC then I don't think it's right. To the point where it's complete ignorance of others doing something wrong. Even when people say "SISU are pricks, CCC pricks, Wasps pricks" there are people trying to move the earth to say that CCC and Wasps have done nothing wrong.
I just don't get it. If (and I say IF again and again to show my thoughts on the likeliness) SISU were to win the legals, that would only be because of Wasps or CCC doing something wrong.
Don't get me wrong, he debates stuff and puts his view without the same nonsense as the Fisherbaiter types but sometimes there are things completely forgotten about / denied just because they don't suit. The Ann Lucas Quote image and the reaction to it is a good example.
Which one are we on about here Shmmeee?
Schmmeee Fletcher?John Fletcher is my dad.
Guess the argument would be he still knows people. Then again... we all know people!I’m not sure he’s in any position of influence is my point. And again, I’m confident that his position isn’t purely about that, but can’t possibly know. Just think it might explain the words chosen sometimes.
As I say just relaying what I know as best I can.
Guess the argument would be he still knows people. Then again... we all know people!
Anyway, suspect he doesn't read these boards anymore(!) but always found him a decent poster back in the GMK days, and a decent Trust chair, too. The hatchet job was bang out of order.
That being said, wrt what's going on now, it'd be a shame if he's let personal grievances cloud his judgement... IMHO. Perfectly understandable mind you, but still a shame.
It's no GMKHe hates SBT. Hence the Chinese firewall.
Don't think that was the last time someone involved in this mess threated to take legal action against our supporters.Tell you what, who would've thought the days of McGinnity suing Nev would be a high point in club-fan relations!
Why's that? Genuine question.He hates SBT. Hence the Chinese firewall.
All just a co incidence.There's definitely a lot of Wasps apologists about at the moment.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?