So engagement is only one way then?
If people read the article rather than just the headline it looks worse on the council as it basically translates to the club saying it needs stadium ownership to survive and the council then selling it to Wasps.
With regards to how they can have the resources to have "journalists" man a live blog all day spinning whatever they can, clickbaiting and misleading but none of them can do anything constructive?
But they don't have the resources do they? Which is one of the reasons why the majority of what is reported isn't constructive?
They obviously do, hence they have somebody to man a live chat every day to try and get everybody worked up.
Why not get that "journalist" to do constructive things?
Strange how they have the resources for particular things
I'm not in charge of who gets assigned to what so I don't know why you're asking meaningless questions to prove a point? They don't have the resources, as they've cut staff dramatically which is a fact. What they prioritise or don't prioritise is not up to me.
It's not meaningless if it's relevant to the topic is it?
I can't remember saying it was up to you, you have jumped in trying to defend their nonsense which didn't quite work out.
I haven't defended their nonsense I've explained reasoning for why they've created the Save the Sky Blues campaign, and why they rarely target Wasps/CCC. You're just not accepting it and trying to ask meaningless questions in an attempt to catch me out. Someone disagrees with you and you yet again try and move the goalposts so you can get one over. Embarrassing.
So what is the reason for them doing it at that exact time?
What goalposts have I moved? They have been the same all along, CET and our situation here. It is you who keeps trying to take it elsewhere.
They aren't meaningless questions if they are related to what is being discussed. It's very relevant if you are saying they have no resources if they are having a live blog manned all day isn't it? Must be important to them
Again, so why all of a sudden is this their main feature? Just a co-incidence?
Where have I said that it is completely content writers? It is the majority of them as they keep hiring for them and the actual journalists are pretty minimal which is why their stories are mostly copy and pasted SEO articles from their main bank.
As the thread states, there is some sort of desperation and the telegraph suddenly going all in adds to that a bit. They have obviously had the call from somewhere again
Of course not. Their campaign has coincided with the run up to the announcement of the vote hasn't it?
You tried to claim there was only a handful of journalists at the CT? Then were claiming on that the rest were content writers?
That's fine, but just because the thread states it doesn't mean I have to automatically agree. Don't get me wrong, it wouldn't surprise me in the slightest if the CT were working alongside the club to generate publicity. The club would be stupid not to reach out. But I can assure you that the CT will not sever ties with Wasps/CCC by running a campaign against them. If I'm wrong and they do then they either know something significant that could topple both parties or they're idiots, to put it bluntly. The campaign works very well for the CT, hence why you're seeing the number of stories published per day. They wouldn't have agreed to it if there wasn't an incentive involved. E.g. engagement/clicks. It works well for both parties, as i've stated.
Another conspiracy ehhh..With regards to how they can have the resources to have "journalists" man a live blog all day spinning whatever they can, clickbaiting and misleading but none of them can do anything constructive?
Another conspiracy ehhh..
I doubt the CET are working alongside the club. Their campaign has coincided with the other desperation, hence this thread.
Why would they have to agree to it? Surely this is a campaign they have thought up solely to help save CCFC?
It's great coverage for the club?
"This is how you can join in the protest"
"how to get involved with the protest"
As you work in the industry, are you being a bit naive on who they would be working with on this "campaign"?
How am I being naive? I said they could be working with each other in some form or another. I never said the club had a say on every single article did I? Neither did I say they wouldn't be working with other parties or that it would be 'great coverage for the club'. It just gives the club an avenue to express its messages through. It's only speculation but if I were acting on behalf of the club I'd be at least feeding bits over to the CT to convey messages across. I think it's a bit naive on your behalf that you don't think they're not working with the club whatsoever.
Don't get me wrong, it wouldn't surprise me in the slightest if the CT were working alongside the club to generate publicity.
'Save our Sky Blues', works well for both parties
Just catching up after a weekend away. What a shambles form JHW, finally the penny has dropped for many. Hopefully the press and the trust now ignore him as well.I do like how its left to the parody accounts to defend that nonsense.
Just catching up after a weekend away. What a shambles form JHW, finally the penny has dropped for many. Hopefully the press and the trust now ignore him as well.
The worst part is having been called out on it he doesn't back down, doesn't apologise, doesn't even have the courage to defend himself. Gets the other accounts to defend him instead.
Where have I said they don't work together or talk at all? I am talking about this "campaign" they are running that you tried to make out they were working with the club on.
You don't seem to want the obvious pointed out, hence you say stuff like this about their campaign.
Judging on it so far, it works much better for other parties. Funny that.
Who is it trying to move the goalposts?
“Dedicate resources”*
*get the work experience kid on Twitter for the afternoon
Sure is.Is LapdogLes another one of Fisherbaiter/AintnoBoddy/Skybluebolloxlol's roster of witless Twitter aliases?
the supporters as we are get shit on again.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?