Who is the better player ? (2 Viewers)

rupert_bear · Feb 2, 2016

Maddison or Murphy ? Granted Jacob Murphy hasn't played too well the last three or four matches but neither has Maddison or the whole team for that matter, but overall who is the most likely match winner. Maddison is certainly a future prospect but for me if part of his fee included Murphy on a permenant deal I could live with that .

pusbccfc · Feb 2, 2016

Different players, but in terms of ability, easily Maddison.

stupot07 · Feb 2, 2016

Maddison is better ability wise.

callumeast · Feb 2, 2016

Maddison. By quite a way.

malkitccfc · Feb 2, 2016

Maddison all day long. Murphy on a permanent deal however would be great business for the club

rupert_bear · Feb 2, 2016

Can I re-phrase the question then, whomiscthe better player for us at th present time

torchomatic · Feb 2, 2016

Maddison. Maybe. At this present time. Murphy. He's got the goals to prove it.

ceetee · Feb 2, 2016

I agree he has tremendous ability but ability on its own wins nothing.

Ability has to be applied.

I was disappointed with Maddison on saturday. He seemed to be showboating rather than playing for the team.

torchomatic · Feb 2, 2016

Agree. We are in the top six with the best chance of promotion we've had in years. This is now down to one player. We are not in the top six because of James Maddison.

ceetee said:
I agree he has tremendous ability but ability on its own wins nothing.

Ability has to be applied.

I was disappointed with Maddison on saturday. He seemed to be showboating rather than playing for the team.

SkyBlueRuffian · Feb 2, 2016

Maddison by a flying Scotsman. Murphy is a liability.

ClarkeZ · Feb 2, 2016

malkitccfc said:
Maddison all day long. Murphy on a permanent deal however would be great business for the club

Couldn't disagree with you more.
We need team players who play for each other, im sorry but Murphy is not that player. He has skill and can burn players, great, but he plays for himself, he's too lazy and he is costing us goals and games by refusing to pass to others and create goals. His final product, aside from the occasional wonderstrike, is poor. I would be really concerned to see him sign permanently.

Hobo · Feb 2, 2016

Maddison but Murphy isn't ours to sell. Both have ability and potential. But I also feel some of our fans have overrated where both are actually at in terms of their current development.

We have the services of both until the end of the season. Let's hope both help our promotion push.

RB1992 · Feb 2, 2016

Murphy isn't fit to lace Maddison's boots

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

standupforcity · Feb 2, 2016

js_lilley said:
Couldn't disagree with you more.
We need team players who play for each other, im sorry but Murphy is not that player. He has skill and can burn players, great, but he plays for himself, he's too lazy and he is costing us goals and games by refusing to pass to others and create goals. His final product, aside from the occasional wonderstrike, is poor. I would be really concerned to see him sign permanently.

Sounds more like you're talking about Kent rather than Murphy. Murphy would be a great addition...yes he has laziness issues, but he's young and when he gets that he's a talented guy, he'll knuckle down...

Grendel · Feb 2, 2016

Which of the two has made the biggest impact for the club this season?

The Lurker · Feb 2, 2016

torchomatic said:
Agree. We are in the top six with the best chance of promotion we've had in years. This is now down to one player. We are not in the top six because of James Maddison.

He got us the winner against port vale, got us a equaliser against chestefield. That's 3 points in the last month or so

The Lurker · Feb 2, 2016

Grendel said:
Which of the two has made the biggest impact for the club this season?

Lol whose been injured for the majority? Shocking comparison to make

Earlsdon_Skyblue1 · Feb 2, 2016

standupforcity said:
Sounds more like you're talking about Kent rather than Murphy. Murphy would be a great addition...yes he has laziness issues, but he's young and when he gets that he's a talented guy, he'll knuckle down...

Kent would indeed be a bad permanent addition, but so would Murphy at this moment in time. He might be talented, but unless that becomes something it ultimately means nothing. His attitude has been terrible and he needs to work a lot harder if he's going to become the player he could be.

Evo1883 · Feb 2, 2016

playing well Murphy causes teams far more problems

Who is the better player ? (2 Viewers)

rupert_bear

Well-Known Member

pusbccfc

Well-Known Member

stupot07

Well-Known Member

callumeast

New Member

malkitccfc

Well-Known Member

rupert_bear

Well-Known Member

torchomatic

Well-Known Member

ceetee

Well-Known Member

torchomatic

Well-Known Member

SkyBlueRuffian

Well-Known Member

ClarkeZ

Well-Known Member

Hobo

Well-Known Member

RB1992

Guest

standupforcity

Well-Known Member

Grendel

Well-Known Member

The Lurker

Well-Known Member

The Lurker

Well-Known Member

Earlsdon_Skyblue1

Well-Known Member

Evo1883

Well-Known Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Who is the better player ? (2 Viewers)

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

New Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

RB1992

Guest

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency