Well actually if criminal acts have been committed then there is a good chance that things will be investigated, because the things that you say in how upper-class people make their money is criminal and I'm sure there are authorities that would be interested. So surely as YOU said that's how them people may make their money then all the people on here who want wrongs to be righted should be up in arms about it, especially as it involves CCFC?
You must be a wanna be politician the way you twist my words. I never said 'upper-class people make their money is criminal'. Use the excellent quote function.
It wasn't me who brought the council into the discussion, it was you post 41 wasn't it?
In post 44 I mentioned that I had forgotten CCC in the long, complicated list of involved parties who hide their motivation and actions behind NDA's. Interesting that I had forgotten them in the first place - if I had a personal grudge or hate against them surely they would be first on that list?
I've never said that CCC shouldn't be investigated, in fact I it seems the sensible thing to do if we get to the bottom of it. I just don't want public money wasted on it if the outcome is that everything was done above board. Also, along with the JR, if this comes out in favour of the council, I'd love to see what you come back with then against the people you seem to hate (for some reason). But it seems interesting that you don't ever question Sisu or demand that they be investigated for the things that they may have done, especially their investors.
I am pretty sure that the obligatory going over contracts and box ticking exercise by the auditor won't reveal any thing criminal. That's why that investigation is a waste of money.
I agree that it would be interesting if I never questioned sisu or their actions. But I have done plenty of that.