Broken Hearted Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
More like the x files
More like the x filesWent out last night and the rumors are that it is Brandon but the speedway do still have 10 years of racing there?
PSGM1 the threats towards your lifemust have come from GCHQ as you are an EX SAS general....................... and they are watching you
Wow These trust trolls are utterly unbelievable.
First the board members say you have mental issues and try and get the moderator to ban my account, then they say they want to talk!
Then the other trust trolls (sorry they don't even have the guts to say they are trust members and say they "left". Which means either they were banned, couldn't afford £1, disagree with the trust or are liars.
They say they are open and honest, yet surprise surprise NOT ONCE are they prepared to speak in public - it is ALWAYS private messages or speaking privately - WHY the secrecy?
Doesn't their OWN constitution very first line state they strive to be open honest and transparent? Throughout theor ENTIRE existence NOT ONCE have they been prepared to engage in public, unless of course it is for the local media.
Any board member of ANY organisation must realise that whether intentional or not, whatever they say will reflect on their oprganisation. By insulting others, trying to suppress criticism (what else would you call demanding accounts to be cancelled?)
So since when did the trust stop saying that they would NOT accept anything that puts the trust in disrepute? Or do you think lets all sing and broken hearted are credits to the trust?
I notice the critical comments but NEVER ANYTHING that counters my arguments - could it be there ARE no defences - that the trust IS devious secretive and actively hostile?
Certainly the e-mails from Mr fletcher were highly aggressive in tone. Certainly NOT what I or anyone else would expect from an open honest and transparent organisation - quite the opposite in fact!
But going to your very founding principles - what happened to being a last resort NOTHING more? That what was rammed down everyone's throats when your clique first started out. I said it was never going to be just that and troll like the aforementioned got EXTREMELY aggressive when I suggested that was not the case!
Certainly when you look at your objectives, there is NO MENTION of being "A LAST RESORT" - so WHEN did that cease to be your goals?
Are you condemning or condoning members of the trust insulting others? Would be interesting if you would PUBLICLY affirm your commitment to trust members SHOULD and are LEGALLY OBLIGED (as they have signed a contract) to abide by your rules.
Will you condemn them or not Steve.B50? Should your group abide by YOUR rules (not mine) or is it just rhetoric by you and your colleagues?
We all KNOW the answert, but will be interesting if you wll be
"OPEN HONEST AND TRANSPARENT"
AGAIN
These are YOUR RULES NOT MINE!!!!
But I suppose those guys who think pretending they are no longer part of the trust will get you off the hook (although it would be interesting that in less than a year the thought of losing members ALREADY must be quite a concern)
I am no longer a member that can be confirmed Ive also told you why in two different posts but obviously you dont read any poste except your own. Call me what you like but one thing I'm not is a liar and one more thing Im not the one that uses every opportunity to divide the fans of Coventry City at a time they should be unified no I leave you to to that.The only question is why? As per usual not expecting a replyWow These trust trolls are utterly unbelievable.
First the board members say you have mental issues and try and get the moderator to ban my account, then they say they want to talk!
Then the other trust trolls (sorry they don't even have the guts to say they are trust members and say they "left". Which means either they were banned, couldn't afford £1, disagree with the trust or are liars.
They say they are open and honest, yet surprise surprise NOT ONCE are they prepared to speak in public - it is ALWAYS private messages or speaking privately - WHY the secrecy?
Doesn't their OWN constitution very first line state they strive to be open honest and transparent? Throughout theor ENTIRE existence NOT ONCE have they been prepared to engage in public, unless of course it is for the local media.
Any board member of ANY organisation must realise that whether intentional or not, whatever they say will reflect on their oprganisation. By insulting others, trying to suppress criticism (what else would you call demanding accounts to be cancelled?)
So since when did the trust stop saying that they would NOT accept anything that puts the trust in disrepute? Or do you think lets all sing and broken hearted are credits to the trust?
I notice the critical comments but NEVER ANYTHING that counters my arguments - could it be there ARE no defences - that the trust IS devious secretive and actively hostile?
Certainly the e-mails from Mr fletcher were highly aggressive in tone. Certainly NOT what I or anyone else would expect from an open honest and transparent organisation - quite the opposite in fact!
But going to your very founding principles - what happened to being a last resort NOTHING more? That what was rammed down everyone's throats when your clique first started out. I said it was never going to be just that and troll like the aforementioned got EXTREMELY aggressive when I suggested that was not the case!
Certainly when you look at your objectives, there is NO MENTION of being "A LAST RESORT" - so WHEN did that cease to be your goals?
Are you condemning or condoning members of the trust insulting others? Would be interesting if you would PUBLICLY affirm your commitment to trust members SHOULD and are LEGALLY OBLIGED (as they have signed a contract) to abide by your rules.
Will you condemn them or not Steve.B50? Should your group abide by YOUR rules (not mine) or is it just rhetoric by you and your colleagues?
We all KNOW the answert, but will be interesting if you wll be
"OPEN HONEST AND TRANSPARENT"
AGAIN
These are YOUR RULES NOT MINE!!!!
But I suppose those guys who think pretending they are no longer part of the trust will get you off the hook (although it would be interesting that in less than a year the thought of losing members ALREADY must be quite a concern)
Wow These trust trolls are utterly unbelievable.
First the board members say you have mental issues and try and get the moderator to ban my account, then they say they want to talk!
Then the other trust trolls (sorry they don't even have the guts to say they are trust members and say they "left". Which means either they were banned, couldn't afford £1, disagree with the trust or are liars.
They say they are open and honest, yet surprise surprise NOT ONCE are they prepared to speak in public - it is ALWAYS private messages or speaking privately - WHY the secrecy?
Doesn't their OWN constitution very first line state they strive to be open honest and transparent? Throughout theor ENTIRE existence NOT ONCE have they been prepared to engage in public, unless of course it is for the local media.
Any board member of ANY organisation must realise that whether intentional or not, whatever they say will reflect on their oprganisation. By insulting others, trying to suppress criticism (what else would you call demanding accounts to be cancelled?)
So since when did the trust stop saying that they would NOT accept anything that puts the trust in disrepute? Or do you think lets all sing and broken hearted are credits to the trust?
I notice the critical comments but NEVER ANYTHING that counters my arguments - could it be there ARE no defences - that the trust IS devious secretive and actively hostile?
Certainly the e-mails from Mr fletcher were highly aggressive in tone. Certainly NOT what I or anyone else would expect from an open honest and transparent organisation - quite the opposite in fact!
But going to your very founding principles - what happened to being a last resort NOTHING more? That what was rammed down everyone's throats when your clique first started out. I said it was never going to be just that and troll like the aforementioned got EXTREMELY aggressive when I suggested that was not the case!
Certainly when you look at your objectives, there is NO MENTION of being "A LAST RESORT" - so WHEN did that cease to be your goals?
Are you condemning or condoning members of the trust insulting others? Would be interesting if you would PUBLICLY affirm your commitment to trust members SHOULD and are LEGALLY OBLIGED (as they have signed a contract) to abide by your rules.
Will you condemn them or not Steve.B50? Should your group abide by YOUR rules (not mine) or is it just rhetoric by you and your colleagues?
We all KNOW the answert, but will be interesting if you wll be
"OPEN HONEST AND TRANSPARENT"
AGAIN
These are YOUR RULES NOT MINE!!!!
But I suppose those guys who think pretending they are no longer part of the trust will get you off the hook (although it would be interesting that in less than a year the thought of losing members ALREADY must be quite a concern)
I am no longer a member that can be confirmed Ive also told you why in two different posts but obviously you dont read any poste except your own. Call me what you like but one thing I'm not is a liar and one more thing Im not the one that uses every opportunity to divide the fans of Coventry City at a time they should be unified no I leave you to to that.The only question is why? As per usual not expecting a reply
Who Do You Think You Are why should you get a reply from the TROLL no one else does
:laugh::laugh:
Oh yes hes a member allrightI dont know who pgsm1 is but its evident hes a member
I dont know who pgsm1 is but its evident hes a member
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?