Why did they help ACL or are you saying they are not a private company?
No, you're right. Fuck the club, bunch of clowns. How dare they ask for millions of pounds and loads of other stuff like free cocaine. I'm so outraged at the moment what with all this Sisu demanding loads of money shit. Outrageous.
I'm just asking whats the reasoning for wanting CCC to help Otium?
Why are SISU asking for help from them?
What help are we talking about?
They want to buy the Ricoh??
They are not a privately owned company.
Coincidentally do you still think ACL are a Quango, or have you stopped calling them that now as that would leave Sisu without a case at the JR?
So the club wanting to buy the ground is automatically an act of charity from the council? Have I missed something? What are you chatting about?
So why do you think a deal hasn't been done for Sisu to buy the Ricoh?
ACL are a private company - the shareholders are not. So in restructuring a loan the council helped the private company.
How, legally, are they not a private company?
Because the Council or Higgs want too much for it?That is not a fact, just my feeling.
So why do you think a deal hasn't been done for Sisu to buy the Ricoh?
So the club wanting to buy the ground is automatically an act of charity from the council? Have I missed something? What are you chatting about?
So the Council wont help in lowering what they want for it you mean?
So many on here seem to back the council more than the club?
When was the club going to buy the Ricoh ?
I always thought it was Sisu that wanted to purchase an unencumbered Ricoh.
Tittle says it all, why should CCC help Otium Entertainment Ltd?
In the past 35 years Coventry has seen Peugeot, Jaguar, Triumph, Massy Ferguson, Rolls Royce, GEC, Courtaulds, and many more other major companies close. CCC did not help any of these as they are private companies and free to do as they wish. These companies provided far more to the city in terms of prestige, jobs, and money than a 3rd Division football club ever will.
Also none of these companies ever (to my knowledge) tied CCC up in an expensive legal battle.
So I'd like to hear the arguments as to why CCC should suddenly help a privately owned company.
After all, we all agree that it would have been better for CCC not to help CCFC back in 2003 don't we?
So many on here seem to back a hedge fund more than their city?
So many on here seem to back a hedge fund more than their city?
They are not a privately owned company.
Coincidentally do you still think ACL are a Quango, or have you stopped calling them that now as that would leave Sisu without a case at the JR?
They are a private company in the same sense that Royal Mail was a private company pre 2013.
ccc didn't help ccfc in 2003. That's the real point.
We were talking about why the council shouldn't help the club. Has the deal not been done because the council don't want to help the club? I'm struggling to understand what you're on about tbh.
I was just asking, should the council help the club?
Should they allow Otium to buy ACL if they don't want to sell?
I was just asking, should the council help the club?
Should they allow Otium to buy ACL if they don't want to sell?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?